Evaluation of Giomer Using Eighth Generation Bonding Agent and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Restoration in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions
Introduction: Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) raise a considerable restorative challenge for the dentist in bonding, as adhesion is not as strong and predictable as enamel bonding. A critical factor for restorative success is the selection of restorative material. Clinicians have tried many rest...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | Indian Journal of Dental Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_68_20 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1825202043939192832 |
|---|---|
| author | Rajvi Bheda Sanjyot Mulay Anita Sanap Tandale |
| author_facet | Rajvi Bheda Sanjyot Mulay Anita Sanap Tandale |
| author_sort | Rajvi Bheda |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction:
Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) raise a considerable restorative challenge for the dentist in bonding, as adhesion is not as strong and predictable as enamel bonding. A critical factor for restorative success is the selection of restorative material. Clinicians have tried many restorative materials and techniques to obtain the best performance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcome of a Giomer and Resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) restoration in NCCL using united states public health service (USPHS) criteria at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months.
Materials and Method:
Patients from age 25 - 50 years having non-carious cervical lesions on both the sides and requiring restorations were screened. 20 patients were selected and further divided into 2 groups using simple random sampling technique. Group A- Beautifil II restoration using G-Premio bond (n = 10) and Group B- Ketac N100 restoration (n = 10). Restorations were done according to manufacturer's instructions and consequently evaluated at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months using the USPHS criteria for marginal discolouration, marginal integrity, surface texture, colour match, gross fracture and post-operative sensitivity.
Results:
Giomer restorations showed better results than RMGIC. There was decrease in alpha ratings in both the study groups i.e., Giomer and RMGIC from 6 to 12 months.
Discussion:
The overall findings suggest that both Giomer and RMGIC gave satisfactory clinical results when used to restore non-carious cervical lesions. Both the materials can successfully be used since there was no statistically significant difference in the clinical outcome. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1dd132e1ecb140db95e867a9a89ede42 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0970-9290 1998-3603 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Indian Journal of Dental Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-1dd132e1ecb140db95e867a9a89ede422025-02-07T15:29:48ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032023-10-0134435035310.4103/ijdr.IJDR_68_20Evaluation of Giomer Using Eighth Generation Bonding Agent and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Restoration in Non-Carious Cervical LesionsRajvi BhedaSanjyot MulayAnita Sanap TandaleIntroduction: Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) raise a considerable restorative challenge for the dentist in bonding, as adhesion is not as strong and predictable as enamel bonding. A critical factor for restorative success is the selection of restorative material. Clinicians have tried many restorative materials and techniques to obtain the best performance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcome of a Giomer and Resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) restoration in NCCL using united states public health service (USPHS) criteria at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Materials and Method: Patients from age 25 - 50 years having non-carious cervical lesions on both the sides and requiring restorations were screened. 20 patients were selected and further divided into 2 groups using simple random sampling technique. Group A- Beautifil II restoration using G-Premio bond (n = 10) and Group B- Ketac N100 restoration (n = 10). Restorations were done according to manufacturer's instructions and consequently evaluated at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months using the USPHS criteria for marginal discolouration, marginal integrity, surface texture, colour match, gross fracture and post-operative sensitivity. Results: Giomer restorations showed better results than RMGIC. There was decrease in alpha ratings in both the study groups i.e., Giomer and RMGIC from 6 to 12 months. Discussion: The overall findings suggest that both Giomer and RMGIC gave satisfactory clinical results when used to restore non-carious cervical lesions. Both the materials can successfully be used since there was no statistically significant difference in the clinical outcome.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_68_20beautifil iiclinical evaluationgiomerketac n100rmgic |
| spellingShingle | Rajvi Bheda Sanjyot Mulay Anita Sanap Tandale Evaluation of Giomer Using Eighth Generation Bonding Agent and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Restoration in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions Indian Journal of Dental Research beautifil ii clinical evaluation giomer ketac n100 rmgic |
| title | Evaluation of Giomer Using Eighth Generation Bonding Agent and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Restoration in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions |
| title_full | Evaluation of Giomer Using Eighth Generation Bonding Agent and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Restoration in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of Giomer Using Eighth Generation Bonding Agent and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Restoration in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Giomer Using Eighth Generation Bonding Agent and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Restoration in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions |
| title_short | Evaluation of Giomer Using Eighth Generation Bonding Agent and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Restoration in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions |
| title_sort | evaluation of giomer using eighth generation bonding agent and resin modified glass ionomer cement restoration in non carious cervical lesions |
| topic | beautifil ii clinical evaluation giomer ketac n100 rmgic |
| url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_68_20 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rajvibheda evaluationofgiomerusingeighthgenerationbondingagentandresinmodifiedglassionomercementrestorationinnoncariouscervicallesions AT sanjyotmulay evaluationofgiomerusingeighthgenerationbondingagentandresinmodifiedglassionomercementrestorationinnoncariouscervicallesions AT anitasanaptandale evaluationofgiomerusingeighthgenerationbondingagentandresinmodifiedglassionomercementrestorationinnoncariouscervicallesions |