Inferior Mesenteric Artery Associated Type II Endoleaks: Are They Predictable?

Purpose This study aims to evaluate the relationship between inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) diameter and risk of type II endoleak. Subjects and Methods: A retrospective study design to review all EVARs performed over a 4-year period at a tertiary care center. Out of the total cohort of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harun Jalil, Syed Mahmood, Iftikhar Zaman, Asaad Osman, Syed Mustafa, Abdullah Saeed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-07-01
Series:The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0042-1742655
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose This study aims to evaluate the relationship between inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) diameter and risk of type II endoleak. Subjects and Methods: A retrospective study design to review all EVARs performed over a 4-year period at a tertiary care center. Out of the total cohort of 400 patients who underwent EVAR, 41 patients (10.3%) developed type II endoleak. The mean IMA ostial diameter for patients with type II endoleak secondary to IMA contributories was 4mm, while the mean IMA diameter for patients with lumbar arteries contributing to the type II endoleak was 3.7mm. Results Statistical analysis using a paired t-test did not show a statistically significant difference in the IMA ostial diameter between the two groups. Conclusion There is no significant correlation between preprocedural IMA ostium diameter and type II endoleak development and hence, preprocedural IMA embolization is not an appropriate prophylactic management strategy.
ISSN:2542-7075
2542-7083