Small RNAs as biomarkers to differentiate benign and malign prostate diseases: An alternative for transrectal punch biopsy of the prostate?

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer and the third most frequent cause of male cancer death in Germany. MicroRNAs (miRNA) appear to be involved in the development and progression of PCa. A diagnostic differentiation from benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) is often only possible through tra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lukas Markert, Jonas Holdmann, Claudia Klinger, Michael Kaufmann, Karin Schork, Michael Turewicz, Martin Eisenacher, Andreas Savelsbergh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247930&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850181378330591232
author Lukas Markert
Jonas Holdmann
Claudia Klinger
Michael Kaufmann
Karin Schork
Michael Turewicz
Martin Eisenacher
Andreas Savelsbergh
author_facet Lukas Markert
Jonas Holdmann
Claudia Klinger
Michael Kaufmann
Karin Schork
Michael Turewicz
Martin Eisenacher
Andreas Savelsbergh
author_sort Lukas Markert
collection DOAJ
description Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer and the third most frequent cause of male cancer death in Germany. MicroRNAs (miRNA) appear to be involved in the development and progression of PCa. A diagnostic differentiation from benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) is often only possible through transrectal punch biopsy. This procedure is described as painful and carries risks. It was investigated whether urinary miRNAs can be used as biomarkers to differentiate the prostate diseases above. Therefore urine samples from urological patients with BPH (25) or PCa (28) were analysed using Next-Generation Sequencing to detect the expression profile of total and exosomal miRNA/piRNA. 79 miRNAs and 5 piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) were significantly differentially expressed (adjusted p-value < 0.05 and log2-Fc > 1 or < -1). Of these, 6 miRNAs and 2 piRNAs could be statistically validated (AUC on test cohort > = 0.7). In addition, machine-learning algorithms were used to identify a panel of 22 additional miRNAs, whose interaction makes it possible to differentiate the groups as well. There are promising individual candidates for potential use as biomarkers in prostate cancer. The innovative approach of applying machine learning methods to this kind of data could lead to further small RNAs coming into scientific focus, which have so far been neglected.
format Article
id doaj-art-1d7cdfade994472aaabe81d6f755ee52
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-1d7cdfade994472aaabe81d6f755ee522025-08-20T02:17:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01163e024793010.1371/journal.pone.0247930Small RNAs as biomarkers to differentiate benign and malign prostate diseases: An alternative for transrectal punch biopsy of the prostate?Lukas MarkertJonas HoldmannClaudia KlingerMichael KaufmannKarin SchorkMichael TurewiczMartin EisenacherAndreas SavelsberghProstate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer and the third most frequent cause of male cancer death in Germany. MicroRNAs (miRNA) appear to be involved in the development and progression of PCa. A diagnostic differentiation from benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) is often only possible through transrectal punch biopsy. This procedure is described as painful and carries risks. It was investigated whether urinary miRNAs can be used as biomarkers to differentiate the prostate diseases above. Therefore urine samples from urological patients with BPH (25) or PCa (28) were analysed using Next-Generation Sequencing to detect the expression profile of total and exosomal miRNA/piRNA. 79 miRNAs and 5 piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) were significantly differentially expressed (adjusted p-value < 0.05 and log2-Fc > 1 or < -1). Of these, 6 miRNAs and 2 piRNAs could be statistically validated (AUC on test cohort > = 0.7). In addition, machine-learning algorithms were used to identify a panel of 22 additional miRNAs, whose interaction makes it possible to differentiate the groups as well. There are promising individual candidates for potential use as biomarkers in prostate cancer. The innovative approach of applying machine learning methods to this kind of data could lead to further small RNAs coming into scientific focus, which have so far been neglected.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247930&type=printable
spellingShingle Lukas Markert
Jonas Holdmann
Claudia Klinger
Michael Kaufmann
Karin Schork
Michael Turewicz
Martin Eisenacher
Andreas Savelsbergh
Small RNAs as biomarkers to differentiate benign and malign prostate diseases: An alternative for transrectal punch biopsy of the prostate?
PLoS ONE
title Small RNAs as biomarkers to differentiate benign and malign prostate diseases: An alternative for transrectal punch biopsy of the prostate?
title_full Small RNAs as biomarkers to differentiate benign and malign prostate diseases: An alternative for transrectal punch biopsy of the prostate?
title_fullStr Small RNAs as biomarkers to differentiate benign and malign prostate diseases: An alternative for transrectal punch biopsy of the prostate?
title_full_unstemmed Small RNAs as biomarkers to differentiate benign and malign prostate diseases: An alternative for transrectal punch biopsy of the prostate?
title_short Small RNAs as biomarkers to differentiate benign and malign prostate diseases: An alternative for transrectal punch biopsy of the prostate?
title_sort small rnas as biomarkers to differentiate benign and malign prostate diseases an alternative for transrectal punch biopsy of the prostate
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247930&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT lukasmarkert smallrnasasbiomarkerstodifferentiatebenignandmalignprostatediseasesanalternativefortransrectalpunchbiopsyoftheprostate
AT jonasholdmann smallrnasasbiomarkerstodifferentiatebenignandmalignprostatediseasesanalternativefortransrectalpunchbiopsyoftheprostate
AT claudiaklinger smallrnasasbiomarkerstodifferentiatebenignandmalignprostatediseasesanalternativefortransrectalpunchbiopsyoftheprostate
AT michaelkaufmann smallrnasasbiomarkerstodifferentiatebenignandmalignprostatediseasesanalternativefortransrectalpunchbiopsyoftheprostate
AT karinschork smallrnasasbiomarkerstodifferentiatebenignandmalignprostatediseasesanalternativefortransrectalpunchbiopsyoftheprostate
AT michaelturewicz smallrnasasbiomarkerstodifferentiatebenignandmalignprostatediseasesanalternativefortransrectalpunchbiopsyoftheprostate
AT martineisenacher smallrnasasbiomarkerstodifferentiatebenignandmalignprostatediseasesanalternativefortransrectalpunchbiopsyoftheprostate
AT andreassavelsbergh smallrnasasbiomarkerstodifferentiatebenignandmalignprostatediseasesanalternativefortransrectalpunchbiopsyoftheprostate