Impact of isotype on the mechanism of action of agonist anti-OX40 antibodies in cancer: implications for therapeutic combinations

Background OX40 has been widely studied as a target for immunotherapy with agonist antibodies taken forward into clinical trials for cancer where they are yet to show substantial efficacy. Here, we investigated potential mechanisms of action of anti-mouse (m) OX40 and anti-human (h) OX40 antibodies,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junping Jing, Laura Bover, C Ian Mockridge, Kerry L Cox, Mark S Cragg, Tatyana Inzhelevskaya, Chris A Penfold, Vikki English, Jane E Willoughby, Hong Shi, Peter J Morley, Heather Jackson, Roopa Srinivasan, Tom Murray, Axel Hoos, Paul Bojczuk, James Smothers, Niranjan Yanamandra, Lang Dou, Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, Laura Seestaller-Wehr, David Kilian, Kui S Voo, Mel John, Heather Niederer, Andrew J Shepherd, Laura Hook, Stephanie Hopley, Sara J Brett, Christopher Hopson, Elaine Paul, Stephen L Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-07-01
Series:Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Online Access:https://jitc.bmj.com/content/12/7/e008677.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850235720287911936
author Junping Jing
Laura Bover
C Ian Mockridge
Kerry L Cox
Mark S Cragg
Tatyana Inzhelevskaya
Chris A Penfold
Vikki English
Jane E Willoughby
Hong Shi
Peter J Morley
Heather Jackson
Roopa Srinivasan
Tom Murray
Axel Hoos
Paul Bojczuk
James Smothers
Niranjan Yanamandra
Lang Dou
Sabyasachi Bhattacharya
Laura Seestaller-Wehr
David Kilian
Kui S Voo
Mel John
Heather Niederer
Andrew J Shepherd
Laura Hook
Stephanie Hopley
Sara J Brett
Christopher Hopson
Elaine Paul
Stephen L Martin
author_facet Junping Jing
Laura Bover
C Ian Mockridge
Kerry L Cox
Mark S Cragg
Tatyana Inzhelevskaya
Chris A Penfold
Vikki English
Jane E Willoughby
Hong Shi
Peter J Morley
Heather Jackson
Roopa Srinivasan
Tom Murray
Axel Hoos
Paul Bojczuk
James Smothers
Niranjan Yanamandra
Lang Dou
Sabyasachi Bhattacharya
Laura Seestaller-Wehr
David Kilian
Kui S Voo
Mel John
Heather Niederer
Andrew J Shepherd
Laura Hook
Stephanie Hopley
Sara J Brett
Christopher Hopson
Elaine Paul
Stephen L Martin
author_sort Junping Jing
collection DOAJ
description Background OX40 has been widely studied as a target for immunotherapy with agonist antibodies taken forward into clinical trials for cancer where they are yet to show substantial efficacy. Here, we investigated potential mechanisms of action of anti-mouse (m) OX40 and anti-human (h) OX40 antibodies, including a clinically relevant monoclonal antibody (mAb) (GSK3174998) and evaluated how isotype can alter those mechanisms with the aim to develop improved antibodies for use in rational combination treatments for cancer.Methods Anti-mOX40 and anti-hOX40 mAbs were evaluated in a number of in vivo models, including an OT-I adoptive transfer immunization model in hOX40 knock-in (KI) mice and syngeneic tumor models. The impact of FcγR engagement was evaluated in hOX40 KI mice deficient for Fc gamma receptors (FcγR). Additionally, combination studies using anti-mouse programmed cell death protein-1 (mPD-1) were assessed. In vitro experiments using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) examining possible anti-hOX40 mAb mechanisms of action were also performed.Results Isotype variants of the clinically relevant mAb GSK3174998 showed immunomodulatory effects that differed in mechanism; mIgG1 mediated direct T-cell agonism while mIgG2a acted indirectly, likely through depletion of regulatory T cells (Tregs) via activating FcγRs. In both the OT-I and EG.7-OVA models, hIgG1 was the most effective human isotype, capable of acting both directly and through Treg depletion. The anti-hOX40 hIgG1 synergized with anti-mPD-1 to improve therapeutic outcomes in the EG.7-OVA model. Finally, in vitro assays with human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMCs), anti-hOX40 hIgG1 also showed the potential for T-cell stimulation and Treg depletion.Conclusions These findings underline the importance of understanding the role of isotype in the mechanism of action of therapeutic mAbs. As an hIgG1, the anti-hOX40 mAb can elicit multiple mechanisms of action that could aid or hinder therapeutic outcomes, dependent on the microenvironment. This should be considered when designing potential combinatorial partners and their FcγR requirements to achieve maximal benefit and improvement of patient outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-1d4a1e220c0f453894379600a08cb4a4
institution OA Journals
issn 2051-1426
language English
publishDate 2024-07-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
spelling doaj-art-1d4a1e220c0f453894379600a08cb4a42025-08-20T02:02:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer2051-14262024-07-0112710.1136/jitc-2023-008677Impact of isotype on the mechanism of action of agonist anti-OX40 antibodies in cancer: implications for therapeutic combinationsJunping Jing0Laura Bover1C Ian Mockridge2Kerry L Cox3Mark S Cragg4Tatyana Inzhelevskaya5Chris A Penfold6Vikki English7Jane E Willoughby8Hong Shi9Peter J Morley10Heather Jackson11Roopa Srinivasan12Tom Murray13Axel Hoos14Paul Bojczuk15James Smothers16Niranjan Yanamandra17Lang Dou18Sabyasachi Bhattacharya19Laura Seestaller-Wehr20David Kilian21Kui S Voo22Mel John23Heather Niederer24Andrew J Shepherd25Laura Hook26Stephanie Hopley27Sara J Brett28Christopher Hopson29Elaine Paul30Stephen L Martin312 Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USAThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA1 Antibody and Vaccine Group, Centre for Cancer Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK1 Antibody and Vaccine Group, Centre for Cancer Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK1 Antibody and Vaccine Group, Centre for Cancer Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK1 Antibody and Vaccine Group, Centre for Cancer Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK1 Antibody and Vaccine Group, Centre for Cancer Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK1 Antibody and Vaccine Group, Centre for Cancer Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK1 Antibody and Vaccine Group, Centre for Cancer Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China8 Immunology Research Unit, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Limited, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, UK2 Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA2 Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA1 Antibody and Vaccine Group, Centre for Cancer Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK2 Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA2 Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA2 Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA2 Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA1 Antibody and Vaccine Group, Centre for Cancer Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK2 Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA2 Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA2 Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA4 ORBIT, Institute of Applied Cancer Science, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA1 Antibody and Vaccine Group, Centre for Cancer Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK5 Biopharm Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Limited, Stevenage, UK6 Protein, Cellular and Structural Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Limited, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, UK5 Biopharm Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Limited, Stevenage, UK5 Biopharm Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Limited, Stevenage, UK2 Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA2 Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA2 Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA5 Biopharm Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Limited, Stevenage, UKBackground OX40 has been widely studied as a target for immunotherapy with agonist antibodies taken forward into clinical trials for cancer where they are yet to show substantial efficacy. Here, we investigated potential mechanisms of action of anti-mouse (m) OX40 and anti-human (h) OX40 antibodies, including a clinically relevant monoclonal antibody (mAb) (GSK3174998) and evaluated how isotype can alter those mechanisms with the aim to develop improved antibodies for use in rational combination treatments for cancer.Methods Anti-mOX40 and anti-hOX40 mAbs were evaluated in a number of in vivo models, including an OT-I adoptive transfer immunization model in hOX40 knock-in (KI) mice and syngeneic tumor models. The impact of FcγR engagement was evaluated in hOX40 KI mice deficient for Fc gamma receptors (FcγR). Additionally, combination studies using anti-mouse programmed cell death protein-1 (mPD-1) were assessed. In vitro experiments using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) examining possible anti-hOX40 mAb mechanisms of action were also performed.Results Isotype variants of the clinically relevant mAb GSK3174998 showed immunomodulatory effects that differed in mechanism; mIgG1 mediated direct T-cell agonism while mIgG2a acted indirectly, likely through depletion of regulatory T cells (Tregs) via activating FcγRs. In both the OT-I and EG.7-OVA models, hIgG1 was the most effective human isotype, capable of acting both directly and through Treg depletion. The anti-hOX40 hIgG1 synergized with anti-mPD-1 to improve therapeutic outcomes in the EG.7-OVA model. Finally, in vitro assays with human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMCs), anti-hOX40 hIgG1 also showed the potential for T-cell stimulation and Treg depletion.Conclusions These findings underline the importance of understanding the role of isotype in the mechanism of action of therapeutic mAbs. As an hIgG1, the anti-hOX40 mAb can elicit multiple mechanisms of action that could aid or hinder therapeutic outcomes, dependent on the microenvironment. This should be considered when designing potential combinatorial partners and their FcγR requirements to achieve maximal benefit and improvement of patient outcomes.https://jitc.bmj.com/content/12/7/e008677.full
spellingShingle Junping Jing
Laura Bover
C Ian Mockridge
Kerry L Cox
Mark S Cragg
Tatyana Inzhelevskaya
Chris A Penfold
Vikki English
Jane E Willoughby
Hong Shi
Peter J Morley
Heather Jackson
Roopa Srinivasan
Tom Murray
Axel Hoos
Paul Bojczuk
James Smothers
Niranjan Yanamandra
Lang Dou
Sabyasachi Bhattacharya
Laura Seestaller-Wehr
David Kilian
Kui S Voo
Mel John
Heather Niederer
Andrew J Shepherd
Laura Hook
Stephanie Hopley
Sara J Brett
Christopher Hopson
Elaine Paul
Stephen L Martin
Impact of isotype on the mechanism of action of agonist anti-OX40 antibodies in cancer: implications for therapeutic combinations
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
title Impact of isotype on the mechanism of action of agonist anti-OX40 antibodies in cancer: implications for therapeutic combinations
title_full Impact of isotype on the mechanism of action of agonist anti-OX40 antibodies in cancer: implications for therapeutic combinations
title_fullStr Impact of isotype on the mechanism of action of agonist anti-OX40 antibodies in cancer: implications for therapeutic combinations
title_full_unstemmed Impact of isotype on the mechanism of action of agonist anti-OX40 antibodies in cancer: implications for therapeutic combinations
title_short Impact of isotype on the mechanism of action of agonist anti-OX40 antibodies in cancer: implications for therapeutic combinations
title_sort impact of isotype on the mechanism of action of agonist anti ox40 antibodies in cancer implications for therapeutic combinations
url https://jitc.bmj.com/content/12/7/e008677.full
work_keys_str_mv AT junpingjing impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT laurabover impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT cianmockridge impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT kerrylcox impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT markscragg impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT tatyanainzhelevskaya impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT chrisapenfold impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT vikkienglish impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT janeewilloughby impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT hongshi impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT peterjmorley impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT heatherjackson impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT roopasrinivasan impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT tommurray impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT axelhoos impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT paulbojczuk impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT jamessmothers impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT niranjanyanamandra impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT langdou impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT sabyasachibhattacharya impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT lauraseestallerwehr impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT davidkilian impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT kuisvoo impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT meljohn impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT heatherniederer impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT andrewjshepherd impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT laurahook impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT stephaniehopley impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT sarajbrett impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT christopherhopson impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT elainepaul impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations
AT stephenlmartin impactofisotypeonthemechanismofactionofagonistantiox40antibodiesincancerimplicationsfortherapeuticcombinations