How Reframing Affects Confidence in Complex Decisions: Evidence from Behavioral Measures and Decisional Styles

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This research examined the impact of reframing on decision confidence and its link with individual decision-making styles in a sample of healthy adults. <b>Methods</b>: Participants completed a Resistance to Reframe Task, which involved two decis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michela Balconi, Angelica Daffinà, Laura Angioletti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-02-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/15/3/244
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850205530618855424
author Michela Balconi
Angelica Daffinà
Laura Angioletti
author_facet Michela Balconi
Angelica Daffinà
Laura Angioletti
author_sort Michela Balconi
collection DOAJ
description <b>Background/Objectives</b>: This research examined the impact of reframing on decision confidence and its link with individual decision-making styles in a sample of healthy adults. <b>Methods</b>: Participants completed a Resistance to Reframe Task, which involved two decision-making steps. In each step, they chose the best option from four alternatives for a workplace situation and rated their confidence in the decision. Then, the task was reframed to highlight the negative consequences of their initial choice, and they reassessed their confidence. Confidence scores and reaction times (RTs) were recorded for the confidence ratings of each step. The General Decision-Making Style (GDMS) and Maximization Scale (MS) were also used to profile decision-making styles and explore their links to behavioral responses. <b>Results</b>: Findings demonstrated that reframing significantly reduces participants’ confidence, particularly in the first step, highlighting its effectiveness in challenging initial choices. Additionally, higher RTs after reframing emphasize the cognitive complexity introduced by the change of perspective and allows us to describe the dynamic of the decision-making process. Correlational findings suggested that while some traits (e.g., dependent style) reduce confidence after the reframing, others (e.g., high standards, decision difficulty) seem to reinforce it. Similarly, decision-making style as MS alternative search increases RTs, reflecting the heightened complexity of reframed decision contexts. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results underscored the importance of considering confidence in the decision and individual differences when studying decision-making under reframing conditions. Individual differences in decision-making styles may act as protective or vulnerability factors to reframe in decision-making processes.
format Article
id doaj-art-1d46bdb7df5a4ee1a9dcd3ac82fedbeb
institution OA Journals
issn 2076-3425
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Brain Sciences
spelling doaj-art-1d46bdb7df5a4ee1a9dcd3ac82fedbeb2025-08-20T02:11:04ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252025-02-0115324410.3390/brainsci15030244How Reframing Affects Confidence in Complex Decisions: Evidence from Behavioral Measures and Decisional StylesMichela Balconi0Angelica Daffinà1Laura Angioletti2International Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, ItalyInternational Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, ItalyInternational Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This research examined the impact of reframing on decision confidence and its link with individual decision-making styles in a sample of healthy adults. <b>Methods</b>: Participants completed a Resistance to Reframe Task, which involved two decision-making steps. In each step, they chose the best option from four alternatives for a workplace situation and rated their confidence in the decision. Then, the task was reframed to highlight the negative consequences of their initial choice, and they reassessed their confidence. Confidence scores and reaction times (RTs) were recorded for the confidence ratings of each step. The General Decision-Making Style (GDMS) and Maximization Scale (MS) were also used to profile decision-making styles and explore their links to behavioral responses. <b>Results</b>: Findings demonstrated that reframing significantly reduces participants’ confidence, particularly in the first step, highlighting its effectiveness in challenging initial choices. Additionally, higher RTs after reframing emphasize the cognitive complexity introduced by the change of perspective and allows us to describe the dynamic of the decision-making process. Correlational findings suggested that while some traits (e.g., dependent style) reduce confidence after the reframing, others (e.g., high standards, decision difficulty) seem to reinforce it. Similarly, decision-making style as MS alternative search increases RTs, reflecting the heightened complexity of reframed decision contexts. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results underscored the importance of considering confidence in the decision and individual differences when studying decision-making under reframing conditions. Individual differences in decision-making styles may act as protective or vulnerability factors to reframe in decision-making processes.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/15/3/244reframedecision-makingcognitive biasconfidence ratingcognitive loaddecision-making style
spellingShingle Michela Balconi
Angelica Daffinà
Laura Angioletti
How Reframing Affects Confidence in Complex Decisions: Evidence from Behavioral Measures and Decisional Styles
Brain Sciences
reframe
decision-making
cognitive bias
confidence rating
cognitive load
decision-making style
title How Reframing Affects Confidence in Complex Decisions: Evidence from Behavioral Measures and Decisional Styles
title_full How Reframing Affects Confidence in Complex Decisions: Evidence from Behavioral Measures and Decisional Styles
title_fullStr How Reframing Affects Confidence in Complex Decisions: Evidence from Behavioral Measures and Decisional Styles
title_full_unstemmed How Reframing Affects Confidence in Complex Decisions: Evidence from Behavioral Measures and Decisional Styles
title_short How Reframing Affects Confidence in Complex Decisions: Evidence from Behavioral Measures and Decisional Styles
title_sort how reframing affects confidence in complex decisions evidence from behavioral measures and decisional styles
topic reframe
decision-making
cognitive bias
confidence rating
cognitive load
decision-making style
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/15/3/244
work_keys_str_mv AT michelabalconi howreframingaffectsconfidenceincomplexdecisionsevidencefrombehavioralmeasuresanddecisionalstyles
AT angelicadaffina howreframingaffectsconfidenceincomplexdecisionsevidencefrombehavioralmeasuresanddecisionalstyles
AT lauraangioletti howreframingaffectsconfidenceincomplexdecisionsevidencefrombehavioralmeasuresanddecisionalstyles