Multiscalar institutional complementarity and the scaling of clusters
Economic geographers have become strongly focused on two scales over the last 25 years : the local and the global. That’s why they mostly ignore the growing literature on the so-called variety of capitalism thesis that, contrary to what the glocalisation thesis claims, stresses a persistent continui...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Société Royale Belge de Géographie and the Belgian National Committee of Geography
2009-03-01
|
| Series: | Belgeo |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/7815 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849701043061915648 |
|---|---|
| author | Pieter Terhorst |
| author_facet | Pieter Terhorst |
| author_sort | Pieter Terhorst |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Economic geographers have become strongly focused on two scales over the last 25 years : the local and the global. That’s why they mostly ignore the growing literature on the so-called variety of capitalism thesis that, contrary to what the glocalisation thesis claims, stresses a persistent continuity of national forms of capitalism and national forms of the state in the era of globalisation. In this variety-of-capitalism literature the concept of institutional complementarity plays a key role. It means, among others, that one institution makes the other more efficient (and vice versa). In their studies on clusters economic geographers stress a strong “horizontal” institutional complementarity at the local level (although they do not use that concept) but largely ignore a “vertical” complementarity of local and national institutions. Adherents of the variety of capitalism thesis, on the other hand, stress a “horizontal” institutional complementarity at the national level but, being blind to geography, ignore a “vertical” institutional complementarity between the national and local level.In this paper I aim to bridge both bodies of literature and to explore the “vertical” institutional complementarity between national forms of capitalism and clusters. To give my arguments flesh and blood, I explore how and why the Dutch vegetables-under-glass cluster is interwoven with the national corporatist institutions, which is a key characteristic of the Dutch form of capitalism and state form. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1d271608528d44009a2d3371c51e7fd7 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1377-2368 2294-9135 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2009-03-01 |
| publisher | Société Royale Belge de Géographie and the Belgian National Committee of Geography |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Belgeo |
| spelling | doaj-art-1d271608528d44009a2d3371c51e7fd72025-08-20T03:18:04ZengSociété Royale Belge de Géographie and the Belgian National Committee of GeographyBelgeo1377-23682294-91352009-03-011436410.4000/belgeo.7815Multiscalar institutional complementarity and the scaling of clustersPieter TerhorstEconomic geographers have become strongly focused on two scales over the last 25 years : the local and the global. That’s why they mostly ignore the growing literature on the so-called variety of capitalism thesis that, contrary to what the glocalisation thesis claims, stresses a persistent continuity of national forms of capitalism and national forms of the state in the era of globalisation. In this variety-of-capitalism literature the concept of institutional complementarity plays a key role. It means, among others, that one institution makes the other more efficient (and vice versa). In their studies on clusters economic geographers stress a strong “horizontal” institutional complementarity at the local level (although they do not use that concept) but largely ignore a “vertical” complementarity of local and national institutions. Adherents of the variety of capitalism thesis, on the other hand, stress a “horizontal” institutional complementarity at the national level but, being blind to geography, ignore a “vertical” institutional complementarity between the national and local level.In this paper I aim to bridge both bodies of literature and to explore the “vertical” institutional complementarity between national forms of capitalism and clusters. To give my arguments flesh and blood, I explore how and why the Dutch vegetables-under-glass cluster is interwoven with the national corporatist institutions, which is a key characteristic of the Dutch form of capitalism and state form.https://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/7815scalinginstitutional complementarityvariety of capitalismclusters |
| spellingShingle | Pieter Terhorst Multiscalar institutional complementarity and the scaling of clusters Belgeo scaling institutional complementarity variety of capitalism clusters |
| title | Multiscalar institutional complementarity and the scaling of clusters |
| title_full | Multiscalar institutional complementarity and the scaling of clusters |
| title_fullStr | Multiscalar institutional complementarity and the scaling of clusters |
| title_full_unstemmed | Multiscalar institutional complementarity and the scaling of clusters |
| title_short | Multiscalar institutional complementarity and the scaling of clusters |
| title_sort | multiscalar institutional complementarity and the scaling of clusters |
| topic | scaling institutional complementarity variety of capitalism clusters |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/7815 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pieterterhorst multiscalarinstitutionalcomplementarityandthescalingofclusters |