A Comparative Study of Ground-Based and Drone-Based GPR: Opportunities, Challenges, and Applications in Bromo, Indonesia
A drone-based GPR offers improved mobility and accessibility for subsurface exploration while delivering high-resolution detection of objects and soil layers, particularly in challenging areas. This study compares the performance and limitations of ground-based and drone-based GPR by analyzing their...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2025-01-01
|
Series: | BIO Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/pdf/2025/08/bioconf_srcm24_05004.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1825206546205769728 |
---|---|
author | Jannah Afni Nur Paramita Eksi Galih Kenya Zukhrufah Syabibah Zakiyya Rochman Juan Pandu Gya Nur Azhali Firmansyah Maulana |
author_facet | Jannah Afni Nur Paramita Eksi Galih Kenya Zukhrufah Syabibah Zakiyya Rochman Juan Pandu Gya Nur Azhali Firmansyah Maulana |
author_sort | Jannah Afni Nur |
collection | DOAJ |
description | A drone-based GPR offers improved mobility and accessibility for subsurface exploration while delivering high-resolution detection of objects and soil layers, particularly in challenging areas. This study compares the performance and limitations of ground-based and drone-based GPR by analyzing their responses to surface condition using GPR radargrams. Data were collected from the Bromo-Tengger Caldera, East Java, Indonesia, using a 150 MHz antenna for drone-based GPR and a 500 MHz antenna for ground-based GPR. Data processing included filters like static correction, bandpass, gain, background removal, FK-filter, and time-to-depth conversion, with additional steps like time cut and trace editing for drone-based GPR. The results of ground-based GPR data appeared more random, with less distinct reflectors due to surface conditions like vegetation and rough terrain, despite noise filtering. Drone-based GPR faced challenges such as greater static correction due to higher altitude, and deviations from planned paths caused by GPS errors. The study concludes that both methods have unique strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them should be based on the survey area’s conditions and project goals. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-1ce70571f6304a7fb84eab825bbc9e29 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2117-4458 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | EDP Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | BIO Web of Conferences |
spelling | doaj-art-1ce70571f6304a7fb84eab825bbc9e292025-02-07T08:20:28ZengEDP SciencesBIO Web of Conferences2117-44582025-01-011570500410.1051/bioconf/202515705004bioconf_srcm24_05004A Comparative Study of Ground-Based and Drone-Based GPR: Opportunities, Challenges, and Applications in Bromo, IndonesiaJannah Afni Nur0Paramita Eksi Galih Kenya1Zukhrufah Syabibah Zakiyya2Rochman Juan Pandu Gya Nur3Azhali Firmansyah Maulana4Geophysical Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh NopemberGeophysical Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh NopemberGeophysical Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh NopemberGeophysical Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh NopemberPT Terra DroneA drone-based GPR offers improved mobility and accessibility for subsurface exploration while delivering high-resolution detection of objects and soil layers, particularly in challenging areas. This study compares the performance and limitations of ground-based and drone-based GPR by analyzing their responses to surface condition using GPR radargrams. Data were collected from the Bromo-Tengger Caldera, East Java, Indonesia, using a 150 MHz antenna for drone-based GPR and a 500 MHz antenna for ground-based GPR. Data processing included filters like static correction, bandpass, gain, background removal, FK-filter, and time-to-depth conversion, with additional steps like time cut and trace editing for drone-based GPR. The results of ground-based GPR data appeared more random, with less distinct reflectors due to surface conditions like vegetation and rough terrain, despite noise filtering. Drone-based GPR faced challenges such as greater static correction due to higher altitude, and deviations from planned paths caused by GPS errors. The study concludes that both methods have unique strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them should be based on the survey area’s conditions and project goals.https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/pdf/2025/08/bioconf_srcm24_05004.pdf |
spellingShingle | Jannah Afni Nur Paramita Eksi Galih Kenya Zukhrufah Syabibah Zakiyya Rochman Juan Pandu Gya Nur Azhali Firmansyah Maulana A Comparative Study of Ground-Based and Drone-Based GPR: Opportunities, Challenges, and Applications in Bromo, Indonesia BIO Web of Conferences |
title | A Comparative Study of Ground-Based and Drone-Based GPR: Opportunities, Challenges, and Applications in Bromo, Indonesia |
title_full | A Comparative Study of Ground-Based and Drone-Based GPR: Opportunities, Challenges, and Applications in Bromo, Indonesia |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of Ground-Based and Drone-Based GPR: Opportunities, Challenges, and Applications in Bromo, Indonesia |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of Ground-Based and Drone-Based GPR: Opportunities, Challenges, and Applications in Bromo, Indonesia |
title_short | A Comparative Study of Ground-Based and Drone-Based GPR: Opportunities, Challenges, and Applications in Bromo, Indonesia |
title_sort | comparative study of ground based and drone based gpr opportunities challenges and applications in bromo indonesia |
url | https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/pdf/2025/08/bioconf_srcm24_05004.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jannahafninur acomparativestudyofgroundbasedanddronebasedgpropportunitieschallengesandapplicationsinbromoindonesia AT paramitaeksigalihkenya acomparativestudyofgroundbasedanddronebasedgpropportunitieschallengesandapplicationsinbromoindonesia AT zukhrufahsyabibahzakiyya acomparativestudyofgroundbasedanddronebasedgpropportunitieschallengesandapplicationsinbromoindonesia AT rochmanjuanpandugyanur acomparativestudyofgroundbasedanddronebasedgpropportunitieschallengesandapplicationsinbromoindonesia AT azhalifirmansyahmaulana acomparativestudyofgroundbasedanddronebasedgpropportunitieschallengesandapplicationsinbromoindonesia AT jannahafninur comparativestudyofgroundbasedanddronebasedgpropportunitieschallengesandapplicationsinbromoindonesia AT paramitaeksigalihkenya comparativestudyofgroundbasedanddronebasedgpropportunitieschallengesandapplicationsinbromoindonesia AT zukhrufahsyabibahzakiyya comparativestudyofgroundbasedanddronebasedgpropportunitieschallengesandapplicationsinbromoindonesia AT rochmanjuanpandugyanur comparativestudyofgroundbasedanddronebasedgpropportunitieschallengesandapplicationsinbromoindonesia AT azhalifirmansyahmaulana comparativestudyofgroundbasedanddronebasedgpropportunitieschallengesandapplicationsinbromoindonesia |