نقد متن الحديث عند نور الدين عتر وصلاح الدين الأدلبي
Some fabricated hadiths spread in an era after the Companions, therefore, the importance of hadith criticism was underestimated. Its provenance, and had a strong influence on the later and contemporary scholars in finding the text criticism, the two researchers identified his interest in the critici...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Arabic |
| Published: |
UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
2023-11-01
|
| Series: | Al-Zahra: Journal for Islamic and Arabic Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/zahra/article/view/35821 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850171200974618624 |
|---|---|
| author | Ade Pahrudin Nurfadhilah Bahrul |
| author_facet | Ade Pahrudin Nurfadhilah Bahrul |
| author_sort | Ade Pahrudin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Some fabricated hadiths spread in an era after the Companions, therefore, the importance of hadith criticism was underestimated. Its provenance, and had a strong influence on the later and contemporary scholars in finding the text criticism, the two researchers identified his interest in the criticism of the text of the hadith and its comparison with the contemporary scholars, Nur al-Din Atar and Salah al-Din bin Ahmed al-Idlibi, aiming to know the criticism of the text with them, and a comparison between their methodologies. The researchers' approach in this research is a comparative study, where the researchers read several books related to this research, taking the opinions of scholars from the advanced and contemporary scholars, and then making a comparison between their approaches. Among the most important results are criteria for criticizing the text, including the criteria agreed upon: (1) contrary to the Qur’an, (2) contrary to hadith, (3) contrary to reason, sense, or history, and (4) that the text does not resemble the words of the prophecy, and includes risks and weaknesses. And Samajah. And there is no difference between Salah al-Din ibn Ahmad al-Adlbi and Nour al-Din Atar in the criticism of the text except in the easy measures, which are (1) in the methodology of Nour al-Din Atar, he mentioned the rickety, and in the methodology of al-Adlbi he mentioned its addition, which is the slander and the samajah. (2) In the methodology of Nur al-Din Atar, there is a criterion: “to search for the hadith, then there is no finding among its people from the chests of the narrators and the stomachs of the books, after the hadiths have been extrapolated and written down.” However, this criterion is not found with Al-Adlbi. The approach of Nur al-Din Atar There is a measure: collecting hadith by extrapolating the chapters, and this measure does not exist with al-Adlbi. The methodology of criticism of the text according to Nur al-Din Atar and Salah al-Din ibn Ahmad al-Adlabi are all in agreement with the methodology of criticism of the text according to the audience. Keywords: matn hadith, method, criticism of hadith. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1cd253b265ea4d9abe78680037be9ec4 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1412-226X 2502-8871 |
| language | Arabic |
| publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
| publisher | UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Al-Zahra: Journal for Islamic and Arabic Studies |
| spelling | doaj-art-1cd253b265ea4d9abe78680037be9ec42025-08-20T02:20:19ZaraUIN Syarif Hidayatullah JakartaAl-Zahra: Journal for Islamic and Arabic Studies1412-226X2502-88712023-11-0120210.15408/zr.v20i2.3582111459نقد متن الحديث عند نور الدين عتر وصلاح الدين الأدلبيAde Pahrudin0Nurfadhilah Bahrul1UIN Syarif Hidayatullah JakartaUIN Syarif Hidayatullah JakartaSome fabricated hadiths spread in an era after the Companions, therefore, the importance of hadith criticism was underestimated. Its provenance, and had a strong influence on the later and contemporary scholars in finding the text criticism, the two researchers identified his interest in the criticism of the text of the hadith and its comparison with the contemporary scholars, Nur al-Din Atar and Salah al-Din bin Ahmed al-Idlibi, aiming to know the criticism of the text with them, and a comparison between their methodologies. The researchers' approach in this research is a comparative study, where the researchers read several books related to this research, taking the opinions of scholars from the advanced and contemporary scholars, and then making a comparison between their approaches. Among the most important results are criteria for criticizing the text, including the criteria agreed upon: (1) contrary to the Qur’an, (2) contrary to hadith, (3) contrary to reason, sense, or history, and (4) that the text does not resemble the words of the prophecy, and includes risks and weaknesses. And Samajah. And there is no difference between Salah al-Din ibn Ahmad al-Adlbi and Nour al-Din Atar in the criticism of the text except in the easy measures, which are (1) in the methodology of Nour al-Din Atar, he mentioned the rickety, and in the methodology of al-Adlbi he mentioned its addition, which is the slander and the samajah. (2) In the methodology of Nur al-Din Atar, there is a criterion: “to search for the hadith, then there is no finding among its people from the chests of the narrators and the stomachs of the books, after the hadiths have been extrapolated and written down.” However, this criterion is not found with Al-Adlbi. The approach of Nur al-Din Atar There is a measure: collecting hadith by extrapolating the chapters, and this measure does not exist with al-Adlbi. The methodology of criticism of the text according to Nur al-Din Atar and Salah al-Din ibn Ahmad al-Adlabi are all in agreement with the methodology of criticism of the text according to the audience. Keywords: matn hadith, method, criticism of hadith.https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/zahra/article/view/35821matn hadith, method, critics of hadith |
| spellingShingle | Ade Pahrudin Nurfadhilah Bahrul نقد متن الحديث عند نور الدين عتر وصلاح الدين الأدلبي Al-Zahra: Journal for Islamic and Arabic Studies matn hadith, method, critics of hadith |
| title | نقد متن الحديث عند نور الدين عتر وصلاح الدين الأدلبي |
| title_full | نقد متن الحديث عند نور الدين عتر وصلاح الدين الأدلبي |
| title_fullStr | نقد متن الحديث عند نور الدين عتر وصلاح الدين الأدلبي |
| title_full_unstemmed | نقد متن الحديث عند نور الدين عتر وصلاح الدين الأدلبي |
| title_short | نقد متن الحديث عند نور الدين عتر وصلاح الدين الأدلبي |
| title_sort | نقد متن الحديث عند نور الدين عتر وصلاح الدين الأدلبي |
| topic | matn hadith, method, critics of hadith |
| url | https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/zahra/article/view/35821 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT adepahrudin nqdmtnạlḥdytẖʿndnwrạldynʿtrwṣlạḥạldynạlạdlby AT nurfadhilahbahrul nqdmtnạlḥdytẖʿndnwrạldynʿtrwṣlạḥạldynạlạdlby |