Rising Arizona: Participation and Results of the 2018 Red for Ed Strike

In 2018, a wave of educator strikes called Red for Ed swept through several states. Educators in Arizona won additional funding from the state legislature, supposedly for teacher salaries, which school boards could spend as they chose. This article quantitatively examines the participation and resul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michelle Doughty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2024-12-01
Series:AERA Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241303493
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850246153634840576
author Michelle Doughty
author_facet Michelle Doughty
author_sort Michelle Doughty
collection DOAJ
description In 2018, a wave of educator strikes called Red for Ed swept through several states. Educators in Arizona won additional funding from the state legislature, supposedly for teacher salaries, which school boards could spend as they chose. This article quantitatively examines the participation and results of the 2018 Arizona educator strike, using this example to speak to theoretical work on types of union activity. I find that after the strike, per-pupil funding, teacher salaries, and student support staff salaries all increased. However, poststrike funding was added to Arizona’s preexisting funding formula, which advantaged the small, rural, predominantly White districts whose educators were less likely to go on strike. Educators who went on strike (often from large, urban districts with low property wealth) thus received less money for their districts and smaller raises than nonparticipating educators. This raises important concerns about how free riders can affect different types of union organizing.
format Article
id doaj-art-1cd138d3b5d34e73972e39fa3bd408bf
institution OA Journals
issn 2332-8584
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series AERA Open
spelling doaj-art-1cd138d3b5d34e73972e39fa3bd408bf2025-08-20T01:59:16ZengSAGE PublishingAERA Open2332-85842024-12-011010.1177/23328584241303493Rising Arizona: Participation and Results of the 2018 Red for Ed StrikeMichelle DoughtyIn 2018, a wave of educator strikes called Red for Ed swept through several states. Educators in Arizona won additional funding from the state legislature, supposedly for teacher salaries, which school boards could spend as they chose. This article quantitatively examines the participation and results of the 2018 Arizona educator strike, using this example to speak to theoretical work on types of union activity. I find that after the strike, per-pupil funding, teacher salaries, and student support staff salaries all increased. However, poststrike funding was added to Arizona’s preexisting funding formula, which advantaged the small, rural, predominantly White districts whose educators were less likely to go on strike. Educators who went on strike (often from large, urban districts with low property wealth) thus received less money for their districts and smaller raises than nonparticipating educators. This raises important concerns about how free riders can affect different types of union organizing.https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241303493
spellingShingle Michelle Doughty
Rising Arizona: Participation and Results of the 2018 Red for Ed Strike
AERA Open
title Rising Arizona: Participation and Results of the 2018 Red for Ed Strike
title_full Rising Arizona: Participation and Results of the 2018 Red for Ed Strike
title_fullStr Rising Arizona: Participation and Results of the 2018 Red for Ed Strike
title_full_unstemmed Rising Arizona: Participation and Results of the 2018 Red for Ed Strike
title_short Rising Arizona: Participation and Results of the 2018 Red for Ed Strike
title_sort rising arizona participation and results of the 2018 red for ed strike
url https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241303493
work_keys_str_mv AT michelledoughty risingarizonaparticipationandresultsofthe2018redforedstrike