Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) versus immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of complements and immunoglobulins (Ig) in pemphigus group

Introduction: Pemphigus is a group of bullous disorders of the skin characterized by the formation of autoantibodies present in the intercellular junction of the epidermis. Diagnosis is made by clinical, histopathological examination, and DIF. As DIF needs frozen sections, fluorescent tagged antibod...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deepika Rana, Nita Khurana, Shramana Mandal, Bijay Laxmi Sahoo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-04-01
Series:Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_113_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825205385862053888
author Deepika Rana
Nita Khurana
Shramana Mandal
Bijay Laxmi Sahoo
author_facet Deepika Rana
Nita Khurana
Shramana Mandal
Bijay Laxmi Sahoo
author_sort Deepika Rana
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Pemphigus is a group of bullous disorders of the skin characterized by the formation of autoantibodies present in the intercellular junction of the epidermis. Diagnosis is made by clinical, histopathological examination, and DIF. As DIF needs frozen sections, fluorescent tagged antibodies, UV light microscope for examination, and trained personnel, its non-availability makes a definitive diagnosis challenging. Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the utility of IHC staining of complements and Ig in cases of Pemphigus. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six diagnosed cases of Pemphigus were stained by Peroxidase immunohistochemical method using monoclonal antibody to IgG, IgA, IgM, IgG4, C3, C4 d with DAB as chromogen. Pemphigus cases include twenty of pemphigus vulgaris (PV), four cases of pemphigus foliaceous (PF), and two of pemphigus vegetans (Pveg). Positivity was defined as the deposition of Ig and complements as distinct, continuous brown staining of keratinocytes at intercellular junctions. Result: On IHC total of 20 PV 17 showed positivity (85%) for IgG, 11 (55%) C4d, 19 (95%) C3d, and 16 (80%) IgG4 deposits at the intercellular junction of the epidermis. All cases of PF showed a deposit of IgG, with three (75%) cases for IgG4, C3d, and C4d. Both cases of Pveg showed positivity for IgG and C4d while one case was negative for IgG4 and C3d. The overall IgG, C3, IgG4, and C4d expression for pemphigus was seen in 88%, 88%, 76.9%, and 61.5% of cases. The relation between these markers, combination of IgG and C3, was best related to each other (P value = 0.80). The sensitivities for IgG, IgG4, and C3 were 77.8%%, 73%, and 73% resp. Conclusion: We conclude that IHC is a useful tool in the diagnosis of PV with the highest sensitivity of IgG and C3d. The combination of IgG and C3d could replace the DIF in almost all of our cases, so IHC on FFPE sections be used as an alternative method to DIF.
format Article
id doaj-art-1c7b9de2523146489d58dda0e76fd263
institution Kabale University
issn 0377-4929
0974-5130
language English
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology
spelling doaj-art-1c7b9de2523146489d58dda0e76fd2632025-02-07T13:57:26ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology0377-49290974-51302024-04-0167233633910.4103/ijpm.ijpm_113_23Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) versus immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of complements and immunoglobulins (Ig) in pemphigus groupDeepika RanaNita KhuranaShramana MandalBijay Laxmi SahooIntroduction: Pemphigus is a group of bullous disorders of the skin characterized by the formation of autoantibodies present in the intercellular junction of the epidermis. Diagnosis is made by clinical, histopathological examination, and DIF. As DIF needs frozen sections, fluorescent tagged antibodies, UV light microscope for examination, and trained personnel, its non-availability makes a definitive diagnosis challenging. Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the utility of IHC staining of complements and Ig in cases of Pemphigus. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six diagnosed cases of Pemphigus were stained by Peroxidase immunohistochemical method using monoclonal antibody to IgG, IgA, IgM, IgG4, C3, C4 d with DAB as chromogen. Pemphigus cases include twenty of pemphigus vulgaris (PV), four cases of pemphigus foliaceous (PF), and two of pemphigus vegetans (Pveg). Positivity was defined as the deposition of Ig and complements as distinct, continuous brown staining of keratinocytes at intercellular junctions. Result: On IHC total of 20 PV 17 showed positivity (85%) for IgG, 11 (55%) C4d, 19 (95%) C3d, and 16 (80%) IgG4 deposits at the intercellular junction of the epidermis. All cases of PF showed a deposit of IgG, with three (75%) cases for IgG4, C3d, and C4d. Both cases of Pveg showed positivity for IgG and C4d while one case was negative for IgG4 and C3d. The overall IgG, C3, IgG4, and C4d expression for pemphigus was seen in 88%, 88%, 76.9%, and 61.5% of cases. The relation between these markers, combination of IgG and C3, was best related to each other (P value = 0.80). The sensitivities for IgG, IgG4, and C3 were 77.8%%, 73%, and 73% resp. Conclusion: We conclude that IHC is a useful tool in the diagnosis of PV with the highest sensitivity of IgG and C3d. The combination of IgG and C3d could replace the DIF in almost all of our cases, so IHC on FFPE sections be used as an alternative method to DIF.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_113_23complementsdirect immunofluorescenceimmunohistochemicalimmunoglobulinspemphigus group
spellingShingle Deepika Rana
Nita Khurana
Shramana Mandal
Bijay Laxmi Sahoo
Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) versus immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of complements and immunoglobulins (Ig) in pemphigus group
Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology
complements
direct immunofluorescence
immunohistochemical
immunoglobulins
pemphigus group
title Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) versus immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of complements and immunoglobulins (Ig) in pemphigus group
title_full Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) versus immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of complements and immunoglobulins (Ig) in pemphigus group
title_fullStr Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) versus immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of complements and immunoglobulins (Ig) in pemphigus group
title_full_unstemmed Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) versus immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of complements and immunoglobulins (Ig) in pemphigus group
title_short Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) versus immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of complements and immunoglobulins (Ig) in pemphigus group
title_sort direct immunofluorescence dif versus immunohistochemical ihc staining of complements and immunoglobulins ig in pemphigus group
topic complements
direct immunofluorescence
immunohistochemical
immunoglobulins
pemphigus group
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_113_23
work_keys_str_mv AT deepikarana directimmunofluorescencedifversusimmunohistochemicalihcstainingofcomplementsandimmunoglobulinsiginpemphigusgroup
AT nitakhurana directimmunofluorescencedifversusimmunohistochemicalihcstainingofcomplementsandimmunoglobulinsiginpemphigusgroup
AT shramanamandal directimmunofluorescencedifversusimmunohistochemicalihcstainingofcomplementsandimmunoglobulinsiginpemphigusgroup
AT bijaylaxmisahoo directimmunofluorescencedifversusimmunohistochemicalihcstainingofcomplementsandimmunoglobulinsiginpemphigusgroup