How animal ethics committees make decisions - a scoping review of empirical studies.
<h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of the scoping review is to explore the decision-making process for the evaluation of animal research proposals within Animal Ethics Committees (AEC) and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC), and to critically summarize the available empirical l...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Aoife Milford, Eva De Clercq, Edwin Louis-Maerten, Lester D Geneviève, Bernice S Elger |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318570 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Perceptions of 3R implementation in European animal research: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-synthesis of barriers and facilitators.
by: Edwin Louis-Maerten, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Ethical collection of animal cadavers for veterinary education
by: Edwin Louis-Maerten, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Undeleting the voice of people with 22q11 deletion syndrome: A scoping review
by: Sophie Ayoub, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
“All things equal”: ethical principles governing why autonomous vehicle experts change or retain their opinions in trolley problems—a qualitative study
by: Stephen R. Milford, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Ensuring ethical animal welfare research: Are more ethics review committees the solution?
by: Nielsen, Birte L., et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)