Using a Surrogate Model in Risk Studies Using CFD Simulations

Risk is a combination of the frequency with which consequences occur, and their cost. We calculate it by estimating the range and frequencies for different initial conditions and calculating predictions that cover these to achieve frequency distributions of consequences, which we combine with loss a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shona Mackie, Connor Bloodworth, Chris Coffey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2025-06-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/15117
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850111088261070848
author Shona Mackie
Connor Bloodworth
Chris Coffey
author_facet Shona Mackie
Connor Bloodworth
Chris Coffey
author_sort Shona Mackie
collection DOAJ
description Risk is a combination of the frequency with which consequences occur, and their cost. We calculate it by estimating the range and frequencies for different initial conditions and calculating predictions that cover these to achieve frequency distributions of consequences, which we combine with loss and fatality models to account for cost. This requires calculation of enough consequence predictions to cover all realistic possibilities, which is often computationally impractical using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. We investigated using a surrogate model to cheaply calculate reliable consequence predictions for tens of thousands of scenarios. The surrogate is built using the inputs and outputs from CFD simulations. We investigated different methods of selecting scenarios for these simulations, and different methods of building a surrogate model. An approach based on a Gaussian process model and a recurrent neural network resulted in predictions of maximum equivalent cloud volume and a predicted probability density function for Q9 volume that are similar to the CFD predictions. The surrogate-predicted distribution is wide enough to capture less frequent events (that are often higher-cost) and can be combined with loss and fatality models to calculate a risk assessment. We used the FLACS-CFD model to demonstrate the method for an example case, focused on a dispersion scenario with a single leak and predictions for equivalent cloud volume. The method could be implemented for other scenario types and other predictions, and for other CFD models. The results are promising, suggesting that this type of surrogate may be useful for risk studies, where it is helpful to have many more predictions than it is computationally practical to simulate with CFD.
format Article
id doaj-art-1c32ebf79f5d45dfb941da8555e3c6cf
institution OA Journals
issn 2283-9216
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
record_format Article
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
spelling doaj-art-1c32ebf79f5d45dfb941da8555e3c6cf2025-08-20T02:37:42ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162025-06-01116Using a Surrogate Model in Risk Studies Using CFD SimulationsShona MackieConnor BloodworthChris CoffeyRisk is a combination of the frequency with which consequences occur, and their cost. We calculate it by estimating the range and frequencies for different initial conditions and calculating predictions that cover these to achieve frequency distributions of consequences, which we combine with loss and fatality models to account for cost. This requires calculation of enough consequence predictions to cover all realistic possibilities, which is often computationally impractical using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. We investigated using a surrogate model to cheaply calculate reliable consequence predictions for tens of thousands of scenarios. The surrogate is built using the inputs and outputs from CFD simulations. We investigated different methods of selecting scenarios for these simulations, and different methods of building a surrogate model. An approach based on a Gaussian process model and a recurrent neural network resulted in predictions of maximum equivalent cloud volume and a predicted probability density function for Q9 volume that are similar to the CFD predictions. The surrogate-predicted distribution is wide enough to capture less frequent events (that are often higher-cost) and can be combined with loss and fatality models to calculate a risk assessment. We used the FLACS-CFD model to demonstrate the method for an example case, focused on a dispersion scenario with a single leak and predictions for equivalent cloud volume. The method could be implemented for other scenario types and other predictions, and for other CFD models. The results are promising, suggesting that this type of surrogate may be useful for risk studies, where it is helpful to have many more predictions than it is computationally practical to simulate with CFD.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/15117
spellingShingle Shona Mackie
Connor Bloodworth
Chris Coffey
Using a Surrogate Model in Risk Studies Using CFD Simulations
Chemical Engineering Transactions
title Using a Surrogate Model in Risk Studies Using CFD Simulations
title_full Using a Surrogate Model in Risk Studies Using CFD Simulations
title_fullStr Using a Surrogate Model in Risk Studies Using CFD Simulations
title_full_unstemmed Using a Surrogate Model in Risk Studies Using CFD Simulations
title_short Using a Surrogate Model in Risk Studies Using CFD Simulations
title_sort using a surrogate model in risk studies using cfd simulations
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/15117
work_keys_str_mv AT shonamackie usingasurrogatemodelinriskstudiesusingcfdsimulations
AT connorbloodworth usingasurrogatemodelinriskstudiesusingcfdsimulations
AT chriscoffey usingasurrogatemodelinriskstudiesusingcfdsimulations