Perception of four intellectual and developmental disabilities based on search engine and news portrayal.

<h4>Background</h4>For people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, other's perceptions of them based on their condition often begin before birth and go on to impact relationships, opportunities, and self perception across the life course. Search engine results and news...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lillian J Droscha, Sophia Chung, Zoe Li-Khan, Ashley Scott, Eric Rubenstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316928
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850040047654404096
author Lillian J Droscha
Sophia Chung
Zoe Li-Khan
Ashley Scott
Eric Rubenstein
author_facet Lillian J Droscha
Sophia Chung
Zoe Li-Khan
Ashley Scott
Eric Rubenstein
author_sort Lillian J Droscha
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>For people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, other's perceptions of them based on their condition often begin before birth and go on to impact relationships, opportunities, and self perception across the life course. Search engine results and news media, which may portray these conditions stereotypically or in poor light, are often a key source in these perceptions. Our purpose was to understand how search engine results and available news media can shape perceptions on certain intellectual and developmental disabilities.<h4>Methods</h4>We developed an online Likert-scale survey to measure differences in perceptions based off first available search engine results, images, and news headlines of four intellectual and developmental disabilities: cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, and Angelman syndrome. These four conditions were selected to compare less prevalent (Prader-Willi and Angelman) and more prevalent conditions (Down syndrome and cerebral palsy). Perception questions addressed general impression and aspects of the disability experience expected to be impacted by perception from others. We recruited via multiple social media platforms, flyers posted in the Boston area, and word of mouth to local communities and friends.<h4>Findings</h4>229 individuals opened the survey, and 125 responses were used in analysis. Mean responses to Prader-Willi syndrome were significantly more negative than responses to cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, and Angelman syndrome across all variables. Responses to Angelman syndrome were also more negative than responses to Down syndrome. Significant differences between conditions found when treating the data as continuous were confirmed when treating the data as ordinal.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Lesser-known intellectual and developmental disabilities, such as Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome, are subject to more negative portrayal in media, leading to more negative perception, which may impact social opportunity and quality of life. Combined with our finding that the perception of Prader-Willi syndrome follows the ideals of the medical model of disability more closely than the social model, a need for social model of disability training and education for physicians and other medical providers is clear.
format Article
id doaj-art-1c2d8be4dec3484d867923f16f2575b3
institution DOAJ
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-1c2d8be4dec3484d867923f16f2575b32025-08-20T02:56:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01202e031692810.1371/journal.pone.0316928Perception of four intellectual and developmental disabilities based on search engine and news portrayal.Lillian J DroschaSophia ChungZoe Li-KhanAshley ScottEric Rubenstein<h4>Background</h4>For people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, other's perceptions of them based on their condition often begin before birth and go on to impact relationships, opportunities, and self perception across the life course. Search engine results and news media, which may portray these conditions stereotypically or in poor light, are often a key source in these perceptions. Our purpose was to understand how search engine results and available news media can shape perceptions on certain intellectual and developmental disabilities.<h4>Methods</h4>We developed an online Likert-scale survey to measure differences in perceptions based off first available search engine results, images, and news headlines of four intellectual and developmental disabilities: cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, and Angelman syndrome. These four conditions were selected to compare less prevalent (Prader-Willi and Angelman) and more prevalent conditions (Down syndrome and cerebral palsy). Perception questions addressed general impression and aspects of the disability experience expected to be impacted by perception from others. We recruited via multiple social media platforms, flyers posted in the Boston area, and word of mouth to local communities and friends.<h4>Findings</h4>229 individuals opened the survey, and 125 responses were used in analysis. Mean responses to Prader-Willi syndrome were significantly more negative than responses to cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, and Angelman syndrome across all variables. Responses to Angelman syndrome were also more negative than responses to Down syndrome. Significant differences between conditions found when treating the data as continuous were confirmed when treating the data as ordinal.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Lesser-known intellectual and developmental disabilities, such as Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome, are subject to more negative portrayal in media, leading to more negative perception, which may impact social opportunity and quality of life. Combined with our finding that the perception of Prader-Willi syndrome follows the ideals of the medical model of disability more closely than the social model, a need for social model of disability training and education for physicians and other medical providers is clear.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316928
spellingShingle Lillian J Droscha
Sophia Chung
Zoe Li-Khan
Ashley Scott
Eric Rubenstein
Perception of four intellectual and developmental disabilities based on search engine and news portrayal.
PLoS ONE
title Perception of four intellectual and developmental disabilities based on search engine and news portrayal.
title_full Perception of four intellectual and developmental disabilities based on search engine and news portrayal.
title_fullStr Perception of four intellectual and developmental disabilities based on search engine and news portrayal.
title_full_unstemmed Perception of four intellectual and developmental disabilities based on search engine and news portrayal.
title_short Perception of four intellectual and developmental disabilities based on search engine and news portrayal.
title_sort perception of four intellectual and developmental disabilities based on search engine and news portrayal
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316928
work_keys_str_mv AT lillianjdroscha perceptionoffourintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilitiesbasedonsearchengineandnewsportrayal
AT sophiachung perceptionoffourintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilitiesbasedonsearchengineandnewsportrayal
AT zoelikhan perceptionoffourintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilitiesbasedonsearchengineandnewsportrayal
AT ashleyscott perceptionoffourintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilitiesbasedonsearchengineandnewsportrayal
AT ericrubenstein perceptionoffourintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilitiesbasedonsearchengineandnewsportrayal