Is rural nonfarm employment distress driven in Uttar Pradesh? Evidence from the NSSO rounds and PLF survey

Abstract Using National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data, this study assesses the employment situation in Uttar Pradesh (UP), the most populous state in India, focusing on rural nonfarm employment. The primary objective of our study is to investigate the potential reasons for the movement of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shadab Hashmi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2024-11-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04097-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850244553440755712
author Shadab Hashmi
author_facet Shadab Hashmi
author_sort Shadab Hashmi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Using National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data, this study assesses the employment situation in Uttar Pradesh (UP), the most populous state in India, focusing on rural nonfarm employment. The primary objective of our study is to investigate the potential reasons for the movement of the labour force from farm to nonfarm activities over time in Uttar Pradesh. In UP, we observe that a higher proportion of workers are engaged in casual employment and employment growth stagnation in the rural manufacturing sector. We further observe that there is a declining proportion of people who are self-employed and regularly employed, and this situation has contributed to the casualisation of the rural workforce in UP. We also find that the average wages in agriculture are lower than those in non-agricultural activities. These observations point to the direction of distress in the agricultural sector, causing a shift in the workforce to a rural nonfarm sector. Casual employment in the rural nonfarm sector is considered to be low-paying employment compared to self-employment and regular employment outside agriculture, which are considered better-paying options. Hence, any movement of the workforce from agriculture to rural casual nonfarm employment is possibly driven by distress in the agricultural sector. Using a multinomial logit model, this study reveals that across all employment status categories, including agricultural labour, cultivators, nonfarm regular employment, nonfarm self-employment, and nonfarm casual employment, the likelihood of working in high-paying nonfarm regular and self-employment activities increases with better educational attainment, larger landholdings, and placement among the upper castes in social groups.
format Article
id doaj-art-1c0dc4d6aedb43acaf45831ab977e848
institution OA Journals
issn 2662-9992
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Springer Nature
record_format Article
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
spelling doaj-art-1c0dc4d6aedb43acaf45831ab977e8482025-08-20T01:59:42ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922024-11-0111111410.1057/s41599-024-04097-9Is rural nonfarm employment distress driven in Uttar Pradesh? Evidence from the NSSO rounds and PLF surveyShadab Hashmi0Department of Economics, Rajendra College, A Constituent Unit of Jai Prakash UniversityAbstract Using National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data, this study assesses the employment situation in Uttar Pradesh (UP), the most populous state in India, focusing on rural nonfarm employment. The primary objective of our study is to investigate the potential reasons for the movement of the labour force from farm to nonfarm activities over time in Uttar Pradesh. In UP, we observe that a higher proportion of workers are engaged in casual employment and employment growth stagnation in the rural manufacturing sector. We further observe that there is a declining proportion of people who are self-employed and regularly employed, and this situation has contributed to the casualisation of the rural workforce in UP. We also find that the average wages in agriculture are lower than those in non-agricultural activities. These observations point to the direction of distress in the agricultural sector, causing a shift in the workforce to a rural nonfarm sector. Casual employment in the rural nonfarm sector is considered to be low-paying employment compared to self-employment and regular employment outside agriculture, which are considered better-paying options. Hence, any movement of the workforce from agriculture to rural casual nonfarm employment is possibly driven by distress in the agricultural sector. Using a multinomial logit model, this study reveals that across all employment status categories, including agricultural labour, cultivators, nonfarm regular employment, nonfarm self-employment, and nonfarm casual employment, the likelihood of working in high-paying nonfarm regular and self-employment activities increases with better educational attainment, larger landholdings, and placement among the upper castes in social groups.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04097-9
spellingShingle Shadab Hashmi
Is rural nonfarm employment distress driven in Uttar Pradesh? Evidence from the NSSO rounds and PLF survey
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
title Is rural nonfarm employment distress driven in Uttar Pradesh? Evidence from the NSSO rounds and PLF survey
title_full Is rural nonfarm employment distress driven in Uttar Pradesh? Evidence from the NSSO rounds and PLF survey
title_fullStr Is rural nonfarm employment distress driven in Uttar Pradesh? Evidence from the NSSO rounds and PLF survey
title_full_unstemmed Is rural nonfarm employment distress driven in Uttar Pradesh? Evidence from the NSSO rounds and PLF survey
title_short Is rural nonfarm employment distress driven in Uttar Pradesh? Evidence from the NSSO rounds and PLF survey
title_sort is rural nonfarm employment distress driven in uttar pradesh evidence from the nsso rounds and plf survey
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04097-9
work_keys_str_mv AT shadabhashmi isruralnonfarmemploymentdistressdriveninuttarpradeshevidencefromthenssoroundsandplfsurvey