An Analysis of the Readings of the Language of the Qurʾān and Its Epistemological Sources

The language of the Qurʾān is one of the most debated topics in scholarly circles, drawing significant attention from experts in the field. As a matter of fact, their views in this field have not been in a specific trajectory. This article employs a documentary-library method alongside a descriptive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhamad jawad Tawakuli Khaniki, Mustafa Haji Hassani Kargar
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Razavi University of Islamic Sciences 2025-02-01
Series:آموزه‌های قرآنی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://qd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1874_5b188b3629368b89226024886ff6e6cd.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849419556759535616
author Muhamad jawad Tawakuli Khaniki
Mustafa Haji Hassani Kargar
author_facet Muhamad jawad Tawakuli Khaniki
Mustafa Haji Hassani Kargar
author_sort Muhamad jawad Tawakuli Khaniki
collection DOAJ
description The language of the Qurʾān is one of the most debated topics in scholarly circles, drawing significant attention from experts in the field. As a matter of fact, their views in this field have not been in a specific trajectory. This article employs a documentary-library method alongside a descriptive approach to conduct a conceptual analysis of the qualitative content found in three readings of the Qurʾānic language, exploring their epistemological sources. The results indicate that the main concerns of the commentators (Arabic: مُفسّر; plural: Arabic: مفسّرون, romanized: mufassirūn) during the era of the Qurʾān’s revelation (Arabic: اَلْنُّزول, Romanized: al-nuzūl) were the succinct expression of verses and a minimal explanation of their literary features. The exegetical narrations of the Prophet Muḥammad ṣallā llāhu ʿalayhī wa-ʾālihī wa-sallama substantiate this claim. The Companions of the Prophet Muḥammad (PBUH) or Ṣaḥāba (Arabic: اَلْصَّحابَة) and tābiʿūn (Arabic: اَلتَّابِعُونَ, also accusative or genitive tābiʿīn اَلتَّابِعِینَ, singular tābiʿ تَابِعٌ) who had schools and traditions of exegesis provided brief explanations in their interpretations of the verses. In the second century, serious debates emerged among Islamic sects regarding the creation of the Qurʾān, with each group striving to assert its own beliefs. Early commentators considered the language of the Qurʾān to be characterized by Arabic linguistic features and tribal dialects. The controversies surrounding the narrations of “Aḥruf-i Sabʿah” and “Gharīb al-Qurʾān,” (Arabic: احرف سبعه و غریب القرآن) as well as some of the grammatical complexities, reflect such discourse. The issue of the createdness of the Qurʾān laid the foundation for later views on the language of the Qurʾān. This was particularly significant in interpreting the verses of mutashābih (Arabic: مُتَشابِه) and the mythical themes of some verses, where commentators faced severe disagreements. These disputes eventually led to the formulation of the doctrine of the created Qurʾān. Recently, the dominance of linguistic and semiotic methods has brought a fresh perspective to this issue. Over the centuries, three interpretations have been proposed: The language of the Qurʾān as a type of dialects and forms of expression, the language of the Qurʾān as the ultimate cause of centuries-long verbal disputes, and its spoken or written form.
format Article
id doaj-art-1bf98a65fa9948d9b7a2fba1516b183d
institution Kabale University
issn 2251-9378
2783-4085
language fas
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Razavi University of Islamic Sciences
record_format Article
series آموزه‌های قرآنی
spelling doaj-art-1bf98a65fa9948d9b7a2fba1516b183d2025-08-20T03:32:03ZfasRazavi University of Islamic Sciencesآموزه‌های قرآنی2251-93782783-40852025-02-012139638410.30513/qd.2024.5069.21051874An Analysis of the Readings of the Language of the Qurʾān and Its Epistemological SourcesMuhamad jawad Tawakuli Khaniki0Mustafa Haji Hassani Kargar1Assistant Professor, Faculty of Qurʾān and Ḥadīth Studies, University of Qurʾān Sciences and Knowledge, Mashhad, IranM.A. Graduate, Department of Qurʾānic Studies, Faculty of Qurʾānic Studies, University of Qurʾān Sciences and Knowledge, Mashhad, IranThe language of the Qurʾān is one of the most debated topics in scholarly circles, drawing significant attention from experts in the field. As a matter of fact, their views in this field have not been in a specific trajectory. This article employs a documentary-library method alongside a descriptive approach to conduct a conceptual analysis of the qualitative content found in three readings of the Qurʾānic language, exploring their epistemological sources. The results indicate that the main concerns of the commentators (Arabic: مُفسّر; plural: Arabic: مفسّرون, romanized: mufassirūn) during the era of the Qurʾān’s revelation (Arabic: اَلْنُّزول, Romanized: al-nuzūl) were the succinct expression of verses and a minimal explanation of their literary features. The exegetical narrations of the Prophet Muḥammad ṣallā llāhu ʿalayhī wa-ʾālihī wa-sallama substantiate this claim. The Companions of the Prophet Muḥammad (PBUH) or Ṣaḥāba (Arabic: اَلْصَّحابَة) and tābiʿūn (Arabic: اَلتَّابِعُونَ, also accusative or genitive tābiʿīn اَلتَّابِعِینَ, singular tābiʿ تَابِعٌ) who had schools and traditions of exegesis provided brief explanations in their interpretations of the verses. In the second century, serious debates emerged among Islamic sects regarding the creation of the Qurʾān, with each group striving to assert its own beliefs. Early commentators considered the language of the Qurʾān to be characterized by Arabic linguistic features and tribal dialects. The controversies surrounding the narrations of “Aḥruf-i Sabʿah” and “Gharīb al-Qurʾān,” (Arabic: احرف سبعه و غریب القرآن) as well as some of the grammatical complexities, reflect such discourse. The issue of the createdness of the Qurʾān laid the foundation for later views on the language of the Qurʾān. This was particularly significant in interpreting the verses of mutashābih (Arabic: مُتَشابِه) and the mythical themes of some verses, where commentators faced severe disagreements. These disputes eventually led to the formulation of the doctrine of the created Qurʾān. Recently, the dominance of linguistic and semiotic methods has brought a fresh perspective to this issue. Over the centuries, three interpretations have been proposed: The language of the Qurʾān as a type of dialects and forms of expression, the language of the Qurʾān as the ultimate cause of centuries-long verbal disputes, and its spoken or written form.https://qd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1874_5b188b3629368b89226024886ff6e6cd.pdfqurʾānic languagecreatedness and eternityspoken languagewritten language
spellingShingle Muhamad jawad Tawakuli Khaniki
Mustafa Haji Hassani Kargar
An Analysis of the Readings of the Language of the Qurʾān and Its Epistemological Sources
آموزه‌های قرآنی
qurʾānic language
createdness and eternity
spoken language
written language
title An Analysis of the Readings of the Language of the Qurʾān and Its Epistemological Sources
title_full An Analysis of the Readings of the Language of the Qurʾān and Its Epistemological Sources
title_fullStr An Analysis of the Readings of the Language of the Qurʾān and Its Epistemological Sources
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of the Readings of the Language of the Qurʾān and Its Epistemological Sources
title_short An Analysis of the Readings of the Language of the Qurʾān and Its Epistemological Sources
title_sort analysis of the readings of the language of the qurʾan and its epistemological sources
topic qurʾānic language
createdness and eternity
spoken language
written language
url https://qd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1874_5b188b3629368b89226024886ff6e6cd.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT muhamadjawadtawakulikhaniki ananalysisofthereadingsofthelanguageofthequrʾananditsepistemologicalsources
AT mustafahajihassanikargar ananalysisofthereadingsofthelanguageofthequrʾananditsepistemologicalsources
AT muhamadjawadtawakulikhaniki analysisofthereadingsofthelanguageofthequrʾananditsepistemologicalsources
AT mustafahajihassanikargar analysisofthereadingsofthelanguageofthequrʾananditsepistemologicalsources