Comparative assessment of aortic valve stenosis using two-dimensional, three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography and cardiac catheterization
Aim. To compare effectiveness of ultrasound, radiological and invasive methods for assessing aortic valve (AV) stenosis.Material and methods. This study included 33 patients with AV stenosis. The mean age of the patients was 71,8±6,8 years. All patients underwent standard and three-dimensional echoc...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
«FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Российский кардиологический журнал |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4809 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849250064427384832 |
|---|---|
| author | M. A. Aripov A. S. Kali N. N. Tanaliev A. A. Musaev G. S. Rashbaeva T. B. Dautov |
| author_facet | M. A. Aripov A. S. Kali N. N. Tanaliev A. A. Musaev G. S. Rashbaeva T. B. Dautov |
| author_sort | M. A. Aripov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim. To compare effectiveness of ultrasound, radiological and invasive methods for assessing aortic valve (AV) stenosis.Material and methods. This study included 33 patients with AV stenosis. The mean age of the patients was 71,8±6,8 years. All patients underwent standard and three-dimensional echocardiography, computed tomography, and cardiac catheterization.Results. According to two-dimensional echocardiography, the AV area averaged 0,58±0,21 mm2, according to cardiac catheterization — 0,61±0,17 mm2, according to three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography — 1,13±0,42 mm2, and according to multislice computed tomography 0,88±0,48 mm2. The difference between the values was significant (p<0,05).Conclusion. For routine diagnosis of AV stenosis, two-dimensional echocardiography is the optimal research method. With indications for radical treatment methods, three-dimensional echocardiography or multislice computed tomography should be performed. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1bee3ac354424442abef0c40947a7e24 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1560-4071 2618-7620 |
| language | Russian |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | «FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Российский кардиологический журнал |
| spelling | doaj-art-1bee3ac354424442abef0c40947a7e242025-08-20T03:57:22Zrus«FIRMA «SILICEA» LLCРоссийский кардиологический журнал1560-40712618-76202022-01-01261210.15829/1560-4071-2021-48093454Comparative assessment of aortic valve stenosis using two-dimensional, three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography and cardiac catheterizationM. A. Aripov0A. S. Kali1N. N. Tanaliev2A. A. Musaev3G. S. Rashbaeva4T. B. Dautov5National Research Cardiac Surgery CenterNazarbayev UniversityNational Research Cardiac Surgery CenterNational Research Cardiac Surgery CenterNational Research Cardiac Surgery CenterNational Research Cardiac Surgery CenterAim. To compare effectiveness of ultrasound, radiological and invasive methods for assessing aortic valve (AV) stenosis.Material and methods. This study included 33 patients with AV stenosis. The mean age of the patients was 71,8±6,8 years. All patients underwent standard and three-dimensional echocardiography, computed tomography, and cardiac catheterization.Results. According to two-dimensional echocardiography, the AV area averaged 0,58±0,21 mm2, according to cardiac catheterization — 0,61±0,17 mm2, according to three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography — 1,13±0,42 mm2, and according to multislice computed tomography 0,88±0,48 mm2. The difference between the values was significant (p<0,05).Conclusion. For routine diagnosis of AV stenosis, two-dimensional echocardiography is the optimal research method. With indications for radical treatment methods, three-dimensional echocardiography or multislice computed tomography should be performed.https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4809aortic stenosisleft ventricular outflow tractechocardiographycomputed tomography |
| spellingShingle | M. A. Aripov A. S. Kali N. N. Tanaliev A. A. Musaev G. S. Rashbaeva T. B. Dautov Comparative assessment of aortic valve stenosis using two-dimensional, three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography and cardiac catheterization Российский кардиологический журнал aortic stenosis left ventricular outflow tract echocardiography computed tomography |
| title | Comparative assessment of aortic valve stenosis using two-dimensional, three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography and cardiac catheterization |
| title_full | Comparative assessment of aortic valve stenosis using two-dimensional, three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography and cardiac catheterization |
| title_fullStr | Comparative assessment of aortic valve stenosis using two-dimensional, three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography and cardiac catheterization |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative assessment of aortic valve stenosis using two-dimensional, three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography and cardiac catheterization |
| title_short | Comparative assessment of aortic valve stenosis using two-dimensional, three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography and cardiac catheterization |
| title_sort | comparative assessment of aortic valve stenosis using two dimensional three dimensional transesophageal echocardiography computed tomography and cardiac catheterization |
| topic | aortic stenosis left ventricular outflow tract echocardiography computed tomography |
| url | https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4809 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT maaripov comparativeassessmentofaorticvalvestenosisusingtwodimensionalthreedimensionaltransesophagealechocardiographycomputedtomographyandcardiaccatheterization AT askali comparativeassessmentofaorticvalvestenosisusingtwodimensionalthreedimensionaltransesophagealechocardiographycomputedtomographyandcardiaccatheterization AT nntanaliev comparativeassessmentofaorticvalvestenosisusingtwodimensionalthreedimensionaltransesophagealechocardiographycomputedtomographyandcardiaccatheterization AT aamusaev comparativeassessmentofaorticvalvestenosisusingtwodimensionalthreedimensionaltransesophagealechocardiographycomputedtomographyandcardiaccatheterization AT gsrashbaeva comparativeassessmentofaorticvalvestenosisusingtwodimensionalthreedimensionaltransesophagealechocardiographycomputedtomographyandcardiaccatheterization AT tbdautov comparativeassessmentofaorticvalvestenosisusingtwodimensionalthreedimensionaltransesophagealechocardiographycomputedtomographyandcardiaccatheterization |