Immune landscape and TAM density in endometrial cancer: implications for immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown efficacy in endometrial cancer (EC); however, their efficacy varies according to mismatch repair (MMR) status. Notably, even among patients with MMR-deficient (MMRd) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, approximately one-third...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2025-08-01
|
| Series: | Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251347364 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850043688428765184 |
|---|---|
| author | Olivia Le Saux Renaud Sabatier Isabelle Treilleux Léa-Isabelle Renaud Pierre-Emmanuel Brachet Alejandra Martinez Jean-Sébastien Frenel Cyril Abdeddaim Justine Berthet Sarah Barrin Amélie Colombe-Vermorel Laetitia Odeyer Alexandra Lainé Christophe Caux Bertrand Dubois Isabelle Ray-Coquard |
| author_facet | Olivia Le Saux Renaud Sabatier Isabelle Treilleux Léa-Isabelle Renaud Pierre-Emmanuel Brachet Alejandra Martinez Jean-Sébastien Frenel Cyril Abdeddaim Justine Berthet Sarah Barrin Amélie Colombe-Vermorel Laetitia Odeyer Alexandra Lainé Christophe Caux Bertrand Dubois Isabelle Ray-Coquard |
| author_sort | Olivia Le Saux |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown efficacy in endometrial cancer (EC); however, their efficacy varies according to mismatch repair (MMR) status. Notably, even among patients with MMR-deficient (MMRd) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, approximately one-third exhibit primary resistance to ICI monotherapy. Objectives: We aimed to characterize dissimilarities in the tumor immune microenvironment of ICI-treated MMRd/MSI-H versus MMR-proficient (MMRp)/microsatellite stable (MSS) EC, and to identify mechanisms of resistance. Design: Adults with histologically confirmed advanced or recurrent EC treated with ICIs in 6 French comprehensive cancer centers were included. Patients without available archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumor samples were excluded. Clinical data were collected retrospectively. Methods: Patients were classified as ICI-Responders or Non-Responders based on best objective response. A seven-color multi-immunofluorescence staining (CD20, CD4, CD8, FoxP3, CD68, CK, and DAPI) was performed on sections from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumors. Cell densities and spatial proximity were analyzed using inForm software. T/B lymphoid aggregates (LA) and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) were separately quantified. Microsatellite status, presence of LA/TLS, and immune cell densities were correlated to response to treatment. Results: Twenty-one MMRd/MSI-H and 12 MMRp/MSS tumors were analyzed. We observed more MMRd/MSI-H tumors with LA/TLS compared to MMRp/MSS cases: 81% versus 17%, p ⩽ 0.001. There were more CD8 + T effector cells in the vicinity of B cells in MMRd/MSI-H tumors compared to MMRp/MSS tumors (1.26 (0–3.40) vs 0.49 (0–1.86), p = 0.017), suggesting cooperation between CD8 + T cells and B cells in MMRd/MSI-H tumors. No differences were shown in terms of the presence of LA/TLS and the subsequent response to ICI in EC ( p = 0.400). Using a multivariate logistic regression model, we found that a low density of CD68 + tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in the stroma, was associated with response to ICI in EC (odds ratio = 11.67, 95% CI (1.69–237.45), p = 0.033) and showed good accuracy in predicting response to ICI in the whole cohort (AUC = 0.75, 95% CI (0.59–0.91)). Conclusion: We characterize the immune landscape in EC patients treated with ICIs. Distinct immune infiltrate patterns were observed in MMRd/MSI-H and MMRp/MSS tumors. A significant negative association between TAM density and ICI response was shown. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1ba2cf16529040b1acd97e788eee0cfd |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1758-8359 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-08-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology |
| spelling | doaj-art-1ba2cf16529040b1acd97e788eee0cfd2025-08-20T02:55:10ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology1758-83592025-08-011710.1177/17588359251347364Immune landscape and TAM density in endometrial cancer: implications for immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacyOlivia Le SauxRenaud SabatierIsabelle TreilleuxLéa-Isabelle RenaudPierre-Emmanuel BrachetAlejandra MartinezJean-Sébastien FrenelCyril AbdeddaimJustine BerthetSarah BarrinAmélie Colombe-VermorelLaetitia OdeyerAlexandra LainéChristophe CauxBertrand DuboisIsabelle Ray-CoquardBackground: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown efficacy in endometrial cancer (EC); however, their efficacy varies according to mismatch repair (MMR) status. Notably, even among patients with MMR-deficient (MMRd) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, approximately one-third exhibit primary resistance to ICI monotherapy. Objectives: We aimed to characterize dissimilarities in the tumor immune microenvironment of ICI-treated MMRd/MSI-H versus MMR-proficient (MMRp)/microsatellite stable (MSS) EC, and to identify mechanisms of resistance. Design: Adults with histologically confirmed advanced or recurrent EC treated with ICIs in 6 French comprehensive cancer centers were included. Patients without available archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumor samples were excluded. Clinical data were collected retrospectively. Methods: Patients were classified as ICI-Responders or Non-Responders based on best objective response. A seven-color multi-immunofluorescence staining (CD20, CD4, CD8, FoxP3, CD68, CK, and DAPI) was performed on sections from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumors. Cell densities and spatial proximity were analyzed using inForm software. T/B lymphoid aggregates (LA) and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) were separately quantified. Microsatellite status, presence of LA/TLS, and immune cell densities were correlated to response to treatment. Results: Twenty-one MMRd/MSI-H and 12 MMRp/MSS tumors were analyzed. We observed more MMRd/MSI-H tumors with LA/TLS compared to MMRp/MSS cases: 81% versus 17%, p ⩽ 0.001. There were more CD8 + T effector cells in the vicinity of B cells in MMRd/MSI-H tumors compared to MMRp/MSS tumors (1.26 (0–3.40) vs 0.49 (0–1.86), p = 0.017), suggesting cooperation between CD8 + T cells and B cells in MMRd/MSI-H tumors. No differences were shown in terms of the presence of LA/TLS and the subsequent response to ICI in EC ( p = 0.400). Using a multivariate logistic regression model, we found that a low density of CD68 + tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in the stroma, was associated with response to ICI in EC (odds ratio = 11.67, 95% CI (1.69–237.45), p = 0.033) and showed good accuracy in predicting response to ICI in the whole cohort (AUC = 0.75, 95% CI (0.59–0.91)). Conclusion: We characterize the immune landscape in EC patients treated with ICIs. Distinct immune infiltrate patterns were observed in MMRd/MSI-H and MMRp/MSS tumors. A significant negative association between TAM density and ICI response was shown.https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251347364 |
| spellingShingle | Olivia Le Saux Renaud Sabatier Isabelle Treilleux Léa-Isabelle Renaud Pierre-Emmanuel Brachet Alejandra Martinez Jean-Sébastien Frenel Cyril Abdeddaim Justine Berthet Sarah Barrin Amélie Colombe-Vermorel Laetitia Odeyer Alexandra Lainé Christophe Caux Bertrand Dubois Isabelle Ray-Coquard Immune landscape and TAM density in endometrial cancer: implications for immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology |
| title | Immune landscape and TAM density in endometrial cancer: implications for immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy |
| title_full | Immune landscape and TAM density in endometrial cancer: implications for immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy |
| title_fullStr | Immune landscape and TAM density in endometrial cancer: implications for immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Immune landscape and TAM density in endometrial cancer: implications for immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy |
| title_short | Immune landscape and TAM density in endometrial cancer: implications for immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy |
| title_sort | immune landscape and tam density in endometrial cancer implications for immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251347364 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT olivialesaux immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy AT renaudsabatier immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy AT isabelletreilleux immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy AT leaisabellerenaud immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy AT pierreemmanuelbrachet immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy AT alejandramartinez immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy AT jeansebastienfrenel immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy AT cyrilabdeddaim immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy AT justineberthet immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy AT sarahbarrin immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy AT ameliecolombevermorel immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy AT laetitiaodeyer immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy AT alexandralaine immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy AT christophecaux immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy AT bertranddubois immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy AT isabelleraycoquard immunelandscapeandtamdensityinendometrialcancerimplicationsforimmunecheckpointinhibitorsefficacy |