Remaining in the Field: The Vulnerability Paradox of Native Member Ethnography
While traditional ethnography typically involves researchers entering the field and then leaving it, but at-home ethnography and autoethnography challenge this norm as researchers remain in their native environments after the research period has ended. This dual role creates a paradox of vulnerabili...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Päivi Kosonen, Kristina Leppälä, Mirjami Ikonen |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Qualitative Methods |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251345125 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Remaining Service Life Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Considering Failure Probability of Members
by: Hae-Chang Cho, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Private messages from the field: Confessions on digital ethnography and its discomforts
by: Crystal Abidin, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Cripping auto-/ethnography?
by: Yvonne Wechuli
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Digital Auto-Ethnography
by: Joanna Neil
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Digital Auto-Ethnography
by: Joanna Neil
Published: (2017-07-01)