Chaeroni , A.., Ramdani, H. T., Orhan, B. E., Khishe, M., Govindasamy, K., Mario, D. T., Ilham, I., Talib, K., & Lani, M. N. (2024). Eficacia del entrenamiento interválico de alta intensidad frente al entrenamiento continuo de intensidad moderada en el consumo máximo de oxígeno (vo2peak), un parámetro cardiorrespiratorio para personas de 40 años y más: una revisión sistemática de la literatura y meta-análisis (Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on peak oxygen uptake (vo2peak) a cardiorespiratory parameter for individuals aged 40 and above: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis). Retos, 59, 608–622. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v59.107824

Chaeroni , A.., Ramdani, H. T., Orhan, B. E., Khishe, M., Govindasamy, K., Mario, D. T., Ilham, I., Talib, K., & Lani, M. N. (2024). Eficacia del entrenamiento interválico de alta intensidad frente al entrenamiento continuo de intensidad moderada en el consumo máximo de oxígeno (vo2peak), un pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Retraction Retraction
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: FEADEF 2025-01-01
Series:Retos: Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deportes y Recreación
Subjects:
Online Access:https://185.79.129.203/index.php/retos/article/view/112580
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Chaeroni , A.., Ramdani, H. T., Orhan, B. E., Khishe, M., Govindasamy, K., Mario, D. T., Ilham, I., Talib, K., & Lani, M. N. (2024). Eficacia del entrenamiento interválico de alta intensidad frente al entrenamiento continuo de intensidad moderada en el consumo máximo de oxígeno (vo2peak), un parámetro cardiorrespiratorio para personas de 40 años y más: una revisión sistemática de la literatura y meta-análisis (Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on peak oxygen uptake (vo2peak) a cardiorespiratory parameter for individuals aged 40 and above: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis). Retos, 59, 608–622. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v59.107824 Retraction of the article by the editor of the journal. There has been several clear and conclusive proofs that there has been a manipulation of the authorship of the article. The accepted Word document was sent with the names of the authors that appeared in the “Corrections for the edition” message so that they could only make the orthographical corrections that were necessary. The corresponding author (or whoever hurt him) changed the authors of the aforementioned Word document that was sent to them, returning a document together with these corrections made with new authors, all without any express notification, without any document explaining the changes made accepted by all the authors and, of course, without express authorization from the journal Retos between both moments. With this fraudulent document the galleys were made and the article was definitively published, assigning it the corresponding DOI. Authors in the Word document of the article submitted for review: 2 Authors in the published PDF with modified authors: 7 Differences between the authors between both moments: +5 (Additions: Hasbi Taobah Ramdani, Mohammad Khishe, Karuppasamy Govindasamy, Ilham, Deby Tri Mario)
ISSN:1579-1726
1988-2041