Health economic evaluation of different colorectal cancer screening strategies in Hubei province: a Markov simulation analysis based on local cancer registration and domestic study data

ObjectiveTo construct a Markov decision model for colorectal cancer screening, evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies, determine the optimal screening strategy, and provide a theoretical reference for improving colorectal cancer screening programs. MethodsA Marko...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jie JI, Yuying WANG, Duan ZHUO, Yuhan LIU, Jiaxi PENG, Ruijingfang JIANG, Hao WU, Song LIU, Lijian ZHAO, Jian WANG, Bing MAO, Shida ZHU, Hongbing TAO
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Public Health 2024-11-01
Series:Zhongguo gonggong weisheng
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.zgggws.com/article/doi/10.11847/zgggws1144039
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591013910151168
author Jie JI
Yuying WANG
Duan ZHUO
Yuhan LIU
Jiaxi PENG
Ruijingfang JIANG
Hao WU
Song LIU
Lijian ZHAO
Jian WANG
Bing MAO
Shida ZHU
Hongbing TAO
author_facet Jie JI
Yuying WANG
Duan ZHUO
Yuhan LIU
Jiaxi PENG
Ruijingfang JIANG
Hao WU
Song LIU
Lijian ZHAO
Jian WANG
Bing MAO
Shida ZHU
Hongbing TAO
author_sort Jie JI
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveTo construct a Markov decision model for colorectal cancer screening, evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies, determine the optimal screening strategy, and provide a theoretical reference for improving colorectal cancer screening programs. MethodsA Markov decision model was constructed to simulate 25 screening strategies, including no screening, with screening start ages of 40, 45, and 50 years, end ages of 59, 64, 69, and 74 years, and screening intervals of 1 and 2 years. Data on the probabilities, screening costs, and medical costs required for the colorectal cancer natural history model were extracted from the Hubei Provincial Cancer Registration (2020)/Mortality Surveillance (2013 – 2017) dataset and the literature review and entered into the model. With a cycle length of 1 year, the health economic impact of different colorectal cancer screening strategies was predicted over multiple cycles. ResultsThe cost-effectiveness analysis at the individual level showed that the screening strategy with the lowest cost was 50-74-1 (annual primary screening with immunochemical fecal occult blood testing [iFOBT] and then required colonoscopy from 50 to 74 years of age), which cost 483 100 Chinese yuan (CNY) in social costs, gained 17.82 life-years (LY) and 16.76 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), with a cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) of 27 100 CNY/LY and 28 800 CNY/QALY, using LY and QALY as outcome measures, respectively. The payback analysis showed that the 45-74-1 strategy (annual primary screening with iFOBT and then required colonoscopy from age 50 to 74 years) had the best cost-effectiveness ratio, consuming 515 200 CNY, gaining 19.49 LY and 18.37 QALY, with a CER of 26 400 yuan/LY and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 19 200 yuan/LY when using LY as the outcome measure, and a CER of 28 000 CNY/QALY and an ICER of 19 900 CNY/QALY when using QALY as the outcome measure. The strategy with the highest effect was 40-74-1 (annual screening from age 40 to 74), which cost 551 700 CNY in social costs and gained 20.97 LY and 19.78 QALYs, with a CER of 26 300 CNY/LY and an ICER of 24 700 CNY/LY using LY as the outcome measure, and a CER of 27 900 CNY/QALY and an ICER of 26 000 CNY/QALY using QALY as the outcome measure. The current colorectal cancer screening strategy in Wuhan, Hubei province, is 45-59-2 (biennial screening from age 45 to 59), which costs CNY 1 035 100 in social costs and gains 18.97 LY (16.8 QALY). The 45-74-1 strategy is more economical than the current strategy in Wuhan, saving 519 900 CNY and gaining an additional 0.52 LY (1.57 QALY). Considering the principle of maximum effect, the 40-74-1 screening strategy can save 483 400 CNY and gain an additional 2.00 LY (2.98 QALY) compared with the current colorectal cancer screening strategy in Wuhan. ConclusionUnder ideal economic conditions, the strategy (40-74-1) with the greatest effect can be prioritized; under limited economic resources, the screening strategy (45-74-1) with the best cost-effectiveness ratio can be prioritized.
format Article
id doaj-art-1a80d72e0431443581acaf3208c4cbde
institution Kabale University
issn 1001-0580
language zho
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Public Health
record_format Article
series Zhongguo gonggong weisheng
spelling doaj-art-1a80d72e0431443581acaf3208c4cbde2025-01-23T05:12:02ZzhoEditorial Office of Chinese Journal of Public HealthZhongguo gonggong weisheng1001-05802024-11-0140111353136210.11847/zgggws11440391144039Health economic evaluation of different colorectal cancer screening strategies in Hubei province: a Markov simulation analysis based on local cancer registration and domestic study dataJie JI0Yuying WANG1Duan ZHUO2Yuhan LIU3Jiaxi PENG4Ruijingfang JIANG5Hao WU6Song LIU7Lijian ZHAO8Jian WANG9Bing MAO10Shida ZHU11Hongbing TAO12School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, ChinaBGI Genomics, Shenzhen 518083, ChinaBGI Genomics, Shenzhen 518083, ChinaUnion Jiangnan Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430200, ChinaBGI Genomics, Shenzhen 518083, ChinaBGI Genomics, Shenzhen 518083, ChinaBGI Genomics, Shenzhen 518083, ChinaWuhan No.1 Hospital, Wuhan 430022, ChinaBGI Genomics, Shenzhen 518083, ChinaBGI Genomics, Shenzhen 518083, ChinaThe Central Hospital of Wuhan, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430014, ChinaBGI Genomics, Shenzhen 518083, ChinaSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, ChinaObjectiveTo construct a Markov decision model for colorectal cancer screening, evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies, determine the optimal screening strategy, and provide a theoretical reference for improving colorectal cancer screening programs. MethodsA Markov decision model was constructed to simulate 25 screening strategies, including no screening, with screening start ages of 40, 45, and 50 years, end ages of 59, 64, 69, and 74 years, and screening intervals of 1 and 2 years. Data on the probabilities, screening costs, and medical costs required for the colorectal cancer natural history model were extracted from the Hubei Provincial Cancer Registration (2020)/Mortality Surveillance (2013 – 2017) dataset and the literature review and entered into the model. With a cycle length of 1 year, the health economic impact of different colorectal cancer screening strategies was predicted over multiple cycles. ResultsThe cost-effectiveness analysis at the individual level showed that the screening strategy with the lowest cost was 50-74-1 (annual primary screening with immunochemical fecal occult blood testing [iFOBT] and then required colonoscopy from 50 to 74 years of age), which cost 483 100 Chinese yuan (CNY) in social costs, gained 17.82 life-years (LY) and 16.76 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), with a cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) of 27 100 CNY/LY and 28 800 CNY/QALY, using LY and QALY as outcome measures, respectively. The payback analysis showed that the 45-74-1 strategy (annual primary screening with iFOBT and then required colonoscopy from age 50 to 74 years) had the best cost-effectiveness ratio, consuming 515 200 CNY, gaining 19.49 LY and 18.37 QALY, with a CER of 26 400 yuan/LY and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 19 200 yuan/LY when using LY as the outcome measure, and a CER of 28 000 CNY/QALY and an ICER of 19 900 CNY/QALY when using QALY as the outcome measure. The strategy with the highest effect was 40-74-1 (annual screening from age 40 to 74), which cost 551 700 CNY in social costs and gained 20.97 LY and 19.78 QALYs, with a CER of 26 300 CNY/LY and an ICER of 24 700 CNY/LY using LY as the outcome measure, and a CER of 27 900 CNY/QALY and an ICER of 26 000 CNY/QALY using QALY as the outcome measure. The current colorectal cancer screening strategy in Wuhan, Hubei province, is 45-59-2 (biennial screening from age 45 to 59), which costs CNY 1 035 100 in social costs and gains 18.97 LY (16.8 QALY). The 45-74-1 strategy is more economical than the current strategy in Wuhan, saving 519 900 CNY and gaining an additional 0.52 LY (1.57 QALY). Considering the principle of maximum effect, the 40-74-1 screening strategy can save 483 400 CNY and gain an additional 2.00 LY (2.98 QALY) compared with the current colorectal cancer screening strategy in Wuhan. ConclusionUnder ideal economic conditions, the strategy (40-74-1) with the greatest effect can be prioritized; under limited economic resources, the screening strategy (45-74-1) with the best cost-effectiveness ratio can be prioritized.https://www.zgggws.com/article/doi/10.11847/zgggws1144039colorectal cancerscreening strategyhealth economic evaluationmarkov model
spellingShingle Jie JI
Yuying WANG
Duan ZHUO
Yuhan LIU
Jiaxi PENG
Ruijingfang JIANG
Hao WU
Song LIU
Lijian ZHAO
Jian WANG
Bing MAO
Shida ZHU
Hongbing TAO
Health economic evaluation of different colorectal cancer screening strategies in Hubei province: a Markov simulation analysis based on local cancer registration and domestic study data
Zhongguo gonggong weisheng
colorectal cancer
screening strategy
health economic evaluation
markov model
title Health economic evaluation of different colorectal cancer screening strategies in Hubei province: a Markov simulation analysis based on local cancer registration and domestic study data
title_full Health economic evaluation of different colorectal cancer screening strategies in Hubei province: a Markov simulation analysis based on local cancer registration and domestic study data
title_fullStr Health economic evaluation of different colorectal cancer screening strategies in Hubei province: a Markov simulation analysis based on local cancer registration and domestic study data
title_full_unstemmed Health economic evaluation of different colorectal cancer screening strategies in Hubei province: a Markov simulation analysis based on local cancer registration and domestic study data
title_short Health economic evaluation of different colorectal cancer screening strategies in Hubei province: a Markov simulation analysis based on local cancer registration and domestic study data
title_sort health economic evaluation of different colorectal cancer screening strategies in hubei province a markov simulation analysis based on local cancer registration and domestic study data
topic colorectal cancer
screening strategy
health economic evaluation
markov model
url https://www.zgggws.com/article/doi/10.11847/zgggws1144039
work_keys_str_mv AT jieji healtheconomicevaluationofdifferentcolorectalcancerscreeningstrategiesinhubeiprovinceamarkovsimulationanalysisbasedonlocalcancerregistrationanddomesticstudydata
AT yuyingwang healtheconomicevaluationofdifferentcolorectalcancerscreeningstrategiesinhubeiprovinceamarkovsimulationanalysisbasedonlocalcancerregistrationanddomesticstudydata
AT duanzhuo healtheconomicevaluationofdifferentcolorectalcancerscreeningstrategiesinhubeiprovinceamarkovsimulationanalysisbasedonlocalcancerregistrationanddomesticstudydata
AT yuhanliu healtheconomicevaluationofdifferentcolorectalcancerscreeningstrategiesinhubeiprovinceamarkovsimulationanalysisbasedonlocalcancerregistrationanddomesticstudydata
AT jiaxipeng healtheconomicevaluationofdifferentcolorectalcancerscreeningstrategiesinhubeiprovinceamarkovsimulationanalysisbasedonlocalcancerregistrationanddomesticstudydata
AT ruijingfangjiang healtheconomicevaluationofdifferentcolorectalcancerscreeningstrategiesinhubeiprovinceamarkovsimulationanalysisbasedonlocalcancerregistrationanddomesticstudydata
AT haowu healtheconomicevaluationofdifferentcolorectalcancerscreeningstrategiesinhubeiprovinceamarkovsimulationanalysisbasedonlocalcancerregistrationanddomesticstudydata
AT songliu healtheconomicevaluationofdifferentcolorectalcancerscreeningstrategiesinhubeiprovinceamarkovsimulationanalysisbasedonlocalcancerregistrationanddomesticstudydata
AT lijianzhao healtheconomicevaluationofdifferentcolorectalcancerscreeningstrategiesinhubeiprovinceamarkovsimulationanalysisbasedonlocalcancerregistrationanddomesticstudydata
AT jianwang healtheconomicevaluationofdifferentcolorectalcancerscreeningstrategiesinhubeiprovinceamarkovsimulationanalysisbasedonlocalcancerregistrationanddomesticstudydata
AT bingmao healtheconomicevaluationofdifferentcolorectalcancerscreeningstrategiesinhubeiprovinceamarkovsimulationanalysisbasedonlocalcancerregistrationanddomesticstudydata
AT shidazhu healtheconomicevaluationofdifferentcolorectalcancerscreeningstrategiesinhubeiprovinceamarkovsimulationanalysisbasedonlocalcancerregistrationanddomesticstudydata
AT hongbingtao healtheconomicevaluationofdifferentcolorectalcancerscreeningstrategiesinhubeiprovinceamarkovsimulationanalysisbasedonlocalcancerregistrationanddomesticstudydata