Japanese Patients’ and Physicians’ Preferences for Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation: Results from a Discrete-choice Experiment

**Background:** Anticoagulants are recommended for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but are associated with an increased risk of bleeding; therefore, physicians face benefit-risk tradeoffs when prescribing anticoagulants to AF patients. Although the unmet medical need for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ken Okumura, Hiroshi Inoue, Masahiro Yasaka, Juan Marcos Gonzalez, A. Brett Hauber, Bennett Levitan, Zhong Yuan, Jean Baptiste Briere
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2015-06-01
Series:Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.36469/9904
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860328868347904
author Ken Okumura
Hiroshi Inoue
Masahiro Yasaka
Juan Marcos Gonzalez
A. Brett Hauber
Bennett Levitan
Zhong Yuan
Jean Baptiste Briere
author_facet Ken Okumura
Hiroshi Inoue
Masahiro Yasaka
Juan Marcos Gonzalez
A. Brett Hauber
Bennett Levitan
Zhong Yuan
Jean Baptiste Briere
author_sort Ken Okumura
collection DOAJ
description **Background:** Anticoagulants are recommended for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but are associated with an increased risk of bleeding; therefore, physicians face benefit-risk tradeoffs when prescribing anticoagulants to AF patients. Although the unmet medical need for safer anticoagulants has been well-documented, there is limited information about the importance that patients and physicians place on cardiovascular events. **Objectives:** The aim of this study was to quantify patients’ and physicians’ willingness to accept tradeoffs between the benefits and risks of anticoagulants in order to 1) document the potential differences between patients’ and physicians’ perceptions of benefits and risks and 2) support physicians’ clinical decision making. **Methods:** Preferences from Japanese AF patients and board-eligible or board-certified physicians were elicited using a discrete-choice experiment. Random-parameters logit models were used to estimate importance weights for treatment-related changes in the annual risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, embolism, and bleeding. **Results:** Japanese patients (N=152) and physicians (N=164) showed different preferences. In particular, among non-fatal outcomes, patients considered disabling stroke to be 16 times more important than non-major clinically relevant bleeding and 2.6 times more important than extra-cranial major bleeding. In contrast, physicians considered the same stroke risk to be 2.7 times more important than non-major clinically relevant bleeding and equally important as major bleeding. **Conclusions:** Results suggest that Japanese patients are willing to tolerate a greater risk of bleeding in exchange for stroke prevention than are Japanese physicians. The findings demonstrate the importance of physician-patient communication in treatment decisions involving stroke preventative therapies.
format Article
id doaj-art-1a7dff498d2342aca8b03225fec1ab23
institution Kabale University
issn 2327-2236
language English
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
record_format Article
series Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj-art-1a7dff498d2342aca8b03225fec1ab232025-02-10T16:12:25ZengColumbia Data Analytics, LLCJournal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research2327-22362015-06-0122Japanese Patients’ and Physicians’ Preferences for Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation: Results from a Discrete-choice ExperimentKen OkumuraHiroshi InoueMasahiro YasakaJuan Marcos GonzalezA. Brett HauberBennett LevitanZhong YuanJean Baptiste Briere**Background:** Anticoagulants are recommended for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but are associated with an increased risk of bleeding; therefore, physicians face benefit-risk tradeoffs when prescribing anticoagulants to AF patients. Although the unmet medical need for safer anticoagulants has been well-documented, there is limited information about the importance that patients and physicians place on cardiovascular events. **Objectives:** The aim of this study was to quantify patients’ and physicians’ willingness to accept tradeoffs between the benefits and risks of anticoagulants in order to 1) document the potential differences between patients’ and physicians’ perceptions of benefits and risks and 2) support physicians’ clinical decision making. **Methods:** Preferences from Japanese AF patients and board-eligible or board-certified physicians were elicited using a discrete-choice experiment. Random-parameters logit models were used to estimate importance weights for treatment-related changes in the annual risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, embolism, and bleeding. **Results:** Japanese patients (N=152) and physicians (N=164) showed different preferences. In particular, among non-fatal outcomes, patients considered disabling stroke to be 16 times more important than non-major clinically relevant bleeding and 2.6 times more important than extra-cranial major bleeding. In contrast, physicians considered the same stroke risk to be 2.7 times more important than non-major clinically relevant bleeding and equally important as major bleeding. **Conclusions:** Results suggest that Japanese patients are willing to tolerate a greater risk of bleeding in exchange for stroke prevention than are Japanese physicians. The findings demonstrate the importance of physician-patient communication in treatment decisions involving stroke preventative therapies.https://doi.org/10.36469/9904
spellingShingle Ken Okumura
Hiroshi Inoue
Masahiro Yasaka
Juan Marcos Gonzalez
A. Brett Hauber
Bennett Levitan
Zhong Yuan
Jean Baptiste Briere
Japanese Patients’ and Physicians’ Preferences for Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation: Results from a Discrete-choice Experiment
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
title Japanese Patients’ and Physicians’ Preferences for Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation: Results from a Discrete-choice Experiment
title_full Japanese Patients’ and Physicians’ Preferences for Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation: Results from a Discrete-choice Experiment
title_fullStr Japanese Patients’ and Physicians’ Preferences for Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation: Results from a Discrete-choice Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Japanese Patients’ and Physicians’ Preferences for Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation: Results from a Discrete-choice Experiment
title_short Japanese Patients’ and Physicians’ Preferences for Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation: Results from a Discrete-choice Experiment
title_sort japanese patients and physicians preferences for anticoagulant use in atrial fibrillation results from a discrete choice experiment
url https://doi.org/10.36469/9904
work_keys_str_mv AT kenokumura japanesepatientsandphysicianspreferencesforanticoagulantuseinatrialfibrillationresultsfromadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT hiroshiinoue japanesepatientsandphysicianspreferencesforanticoagulantuseinatrialfibrillationresultsfromadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT masahiroyasaka japanesepatientsandphysicianspreferencesforanticoagulantuseinatrialfibrillationresultsfromadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT juanmarcosgonzalez japanesepatientsandphysicianspreferencesforanticoagulantuseinatrialfibrillationresultsfromadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT abretthauber japanesepatientsandphysicianspreferencesforanticoagulantuseinatrialfibrillationresultsfromadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT bennettlevitan japanesepatientsandphysicianspreferencesforanticoagulantuseinatrialfibrillationresultsfromadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT zhongyuan japanesepatientsandphysicianspreferencesforanticoagulantuseinatrialfibrillationresultsfromadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT jeanbaptistebriere japanesepatientsandphysicianspreferencesforanticoagulantuseinatrialfibrillationresultsfromadiscretechoiceexperiment