The effects of natural additives on litter condition, microclimate environment and antimicrobial resistance in the broiler chickens rearing

IntroductionFeed additives like humic substances (HS) and probiotics (P) can enhance broiler health, production, welfare, and environmental conditions.MethodsThis study involved 120 one-day-old ROSS 308 broiler chicks divided into three groups for a 39-day fattening period. The first experimental gr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikola Dančová, Gabriela Gregová, Tatiana Szabóová, Slavomír Marcinčák
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1380876/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850253096537554944
author Nikola Dančová
Gabriela Gregová
Tatiana Szabóová
Slavomír Marcinčák
author_facet Nikola Dančová
Gabriela Gregová
Tatiana Szabóová
Slavomír Marcinčák
author_sort Nikola Dančová
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionFeed additives like humic substances (HS) and probiotics (P) can enhance broiler health, production, welfare, and environmental conditions.MethodsThis study involved 120 one-day-old ROSS 308 broiler chicks divided into three groups for a 39-day fattening period. The first experimental group (HS) received a feed mixture with 0.6% HS; the second group (HS + P) got the same HS concentration along with a probiotic strain (Limosilactobacillus fermentum) in water. The control group (C) was fed a basal diet without additives. The HS mixture was also added to the litter in both the HS and HS + P groups, whereas the C group did not receive any HS. The study examined the effects of HS as litter additives on the physical– chemical properties of poultry litter and its capacity to emit fewer harmful gases. Gas emissions were measured using a plastic chamber connected to a uniTOX instrument, and litter moisture was assessed using AOAC methods.ResultsBy days 21, 28, and 35, the moisture levels in the HS and HS + P groups were significantly lower (p < 0.001) compared to the C group. HS maintained a slightly acidic pH in the experimental groups, whereas the C group’s pH became slightly alkaline. The absorption properties of HS and pH stabilization contributed to the rise in NH3 and CO2 emissions to the environment at a lower rate than in the C group (p > 0.05). The second aim was to monitor the influence of HS and P as feed and litter additives on bacterial counts and the antimicrobial resistance of E. coli isolates by the microdilution method. Coliform and fecal coliform counts were significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the litter of the experimental groups on day 35. Minimum inhibitory concentration revealed resistance to ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, ampicillin + sulbactam, and cotrimoxazole among E. coli isolates, with resistance ranging from 5 to 15% across all groups.DiscussionIt is concluded that the effect of the additives used increased litter quality. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating additives into intensive poultry systems, where maintaining litter quality is crucial to reducing disease transmission, improving animal welfare, and increasing production efficiency.
format Article
id doaj-art-1a27cff0760e46fca7578c15842f4b30
institution OA Journals
issn 2571-581X
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
spelling doaj-art-1a27cff0760e46fca7578c15842f4b302025-08-20T01:57:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems2571-581X2025-03-01910.3389/fsufs.2025.13808761380876The effects of natural additives on litter condition, microclimate environment and antimicrobial resistance in the broiler chickens rearingNikola Dančová0Gabriela Gregová1Tatiana Szabóová2Slavomír Marcinčák3Department of Public Veterinary Medicine and Animal Welfare, The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, SlovakiaDepartment of Public Veterinary Medicine and Animal Welfare, The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, SlovakiaDepartment of Public Veterinary Medicine and Animal Welfare, The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, SlovakiaDepartment of Food Hygiene, Technology and Safety, The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, SlovakiaIntroductionFeed additives like humic substances (HS) and probiotics (P) can enhance broiler health, production, welfare, and environmental conditions.MethodsThis study involved 120 one-day-old ROSS 308 broiler chicks divided into three groups for a 39-day fattening period. The first experimental group (HS) received a feed mixture with 0.6% HS; the second group (HS + P) got the same HS concentration along with a probiotic strain (Limosilactobacillus fermentum) in water. The control group (C) was fed a basal diet without additives. The HS mixture was also added to the litter in both the HS and HS + P groups, whereas the C group did not receive any HS. The study examined the effects of HS as litter additives on the physical– chemical properties of poultry litter and its capacity to emit fewer harmful gases. Gas emissions were measured using a plastic chamber connected to a uniTOX instrument, and litter moisture was assessed using AOAC methods.ResultsBy days 21, 28, and 35, the moisture levels in the HS and HS + P groups were significantly lower (p < 0.001) compared to the C group. HS maintained a slightly acidic pH in the experimental groups, whereas the C group’s pH became slightly alkaline. The absorption properties of HS and pH stabilization contributed to the rise in NH3 and CO2 emissions to the environment at a lower rate than in the C group (p > 0.05). The second aim was to monitor the influence of HS and P as feed and litter additives on bacterial counts and the antimicrobial resistance of E. coli isolates by the microdilution method. Coliform and fecal coliform counts were significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the litter of the experimental groups on day 35. Minimum inhibitory concentration revealed resistance to ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, ampicillin + sulbactam, and cotrimoxazole among E. coli isolates, with resistance ranging from 5 to 15% across all groups.DiscussionIt is concluded that the effect of the additives used increased litter quality. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating additives into intensive poultry systems, where maintaining litter quality is crucial to reducing disease transmission, improving animal welfare, and increasing production efficiency.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1380876/fullfeed additiveshumic substancesbroilersEscherichia coligases
spellingShingle Nikola Dančová
Gabriela Gregová
Tatiana Szabóová
Slavomír Marcinčák
The effects of natural additives on litter condition, microclimate environment and antimicrobial resistance in the broiler chickens rearing
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
feed additives
humic substances
broilers
Escherichia coli
gases
title The effects of natural additives on litter condition, microclimate environment and antimicrobial resistance in the broiler chickens rearing
title_full The effects of natural additives on litter condition, microclimate environment and antimicrobial resistance in the broiler chickens rearing
title_fullStr The effects of natural additives on litter condition, microclimate environment and antimicrobial resistance in the broiler chickens rearing
title_full_unstemmed The effects of natural additives on litter condition, microclimate environment and antimicrobial resistance in the broiler chickens rearing
title_short The effects of natural additives on litter condition, microclimate environment and antimicrobial resistance in the broiler chickens rearing
title_sort effects of natural additives on litter condition microclimate environment and antimicrobial resistance in the broiler chickens rearing
topic feed additives
humic substances
broilers
Escherichia coli
gases
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1380876/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nikoladancova theeffectsofnaturaladditivesonlitterconditionmicroclimateenvironmentandantimicrobialresistanceinthebroilerchickensrearing
AT gabrielagregova theeffectsofnaturaladditivesonlitterconditionmicroclimateenvironmentandantimicrobialresistanceinthebroilerchickensrearing
AT tatianaszaboova theeffectsofnaturaladditivesonlitterconditionmicroclimateenvironmentandantimicrobialresistanceinthebroilerchickensrearing
AT slavomirmarcincak theeffectsofnaturaladditivesonlitterconditionmicroclimateenvironmentandantimicrobialresistanceinthebroilerchickensrearing
AT nikoladancova effectsofnaturaladditivesonlitterconditionmicroclimateenvironmentandantimicrobialresistanceinthebroilerchickensrearing
AT gabrielagregova effectsofnaturaladditivesonlitterconditionmicroclimateenvironmentandantimicrobialresistanceinthebroilerchickensrearing
AT tatianaszaboova effectsofnaturaladditivesonlitterconditionmicroclimateenvironmentandantimicrobialresistanceinthebroilerchickensrearing
AT slavomirmarcincak effectsofnaturaladditivesonlitterconditionmicroclimateenvironmentandantimicrobialresistanceinthebroilerchickensrearing