Suicide Notes under Judicial Scrutiny in India

In this paper I focus on particular kinds of texts that may be found in court files on suicides and are commonly known as suicide notes, that is notes supposedly written by a person who has allegedly committed suicide and who wrote down their reason for taking their own life. Unlike most of the “voi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniela Berti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre d’Etudes de l’Inde et de l’Asie du Sud 2018-02-01
Series:South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/samaj/4481
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850167438166982656
author Daniela Berti
author_facet Daniela Berti
author_sort Daniela Berti
collection DOAJ
description In this paper I focus on particular kinds of texts that may be found in court files on suicides and are commonly known as suicide notes, that is notes supposedly written by a person who has allegedly committed suicide and who wrote down their reason for taking their own life. Unlike most of the “voices” that emerge from a court file, which are always mediated by a legal or judicial representative—the police, the court or the lawyer—suicide notes are not supposed to undergo this legal and linguistic formatting. In fact, unlike other court documents, which in spite of being written in the first person by the witness are an official transcription of an oral statement, the content of a suicide note is supposed to have been originally produced in writing and the person referred to in the note as “I” is supposed to be the author of the note. One of the main issues raised by these notes in court is their authenticity. We are in fact dealing here with texts that appear to have been spontaneously written but whose authenticity is often challenged either by the prosecutor or by the defense lawyer—depending on what is written in the note. The interest these notes have for the anthropologist is therefore twofold. On the one hand, they provide a version of the suicide that is not directly produced by a court officer but is supposedly written by the person who committed suicide or, in the case where it has been fabricated, by the victim’s family or in-laws. On the other hand, these notes are subjected to judicial scrutiny and interpretation; therefore, whether they are real or fictional, they produce a court discourse and they sometimes even appear to have been written with the view to the judicial outcome. I will therefore look at these notes both as a lens which can give access to the deceased’s last thoughts—or to those of her entourage if the note is fabricated—and as a lens used by judges themselves to arrive at a decision
format Article
id doaj-art-1a1da6f93ea4485a883abfedfcd3aa36
institution OA Journals
issn 1960-6060
language English
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher Centre d’Etudes de l’Inde et de l’Asie du Sud
record_format Article
series South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal
spelling doaj-art-1a1da6f93ea4485a883abfedfcd3aa362025-08-20T02:21:12ZengCentre d’Etudes de l’Inde et de l’Asie du SudSouth Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal1960-60602018-02-011710.4000/samaj.4481Suicide Notes under Judicial Scrutiny in IndiaDaniela BertiIn this paper I focus on particular kinds of texts that may be found in court files on suicides and are commonly known as suicide notes, that is notes supposedly written by a person who has allegedly committed suicide and who wrote down their reason for taking their own life. Unlike most of the “voices” that emerge from a court file, which are always mediated by a legal or judicial representative—the police, the court or the lawyer—suicide notes are not supposed to undergo this legal and linguistic formatting. In fact, unlike other court documents, which in spite of being written in the first person by the witness are an official transcription of an oral statement, the content of a suicide note is supposed to have been originally produced in writing and the person referred to in the note as “I” is supposed to be the author of the note. One of the main issues raised by these notes in court is their authenticity. We are in fact dealing here with texts that appear to have been spontaneously written but whose authenticity is often challenged either by the prosecutor or by the defense lawyer—depending on what is written in the note. The interest these notes have for the anthropologist is therefore twofold. On the one hand, they provide a version of the suicide that is not directly produced by a court officer but is supposedly written by the person who committed suicide or, in the case where it has been fabricated, by the victim’s family or in-laws. On the other hand, these notes are subjected to judicial scrutiny and interpretation; therefore, whether they are real or fictional, they produce a court discourse and they sometimes even appear to have been written with the view to the judicial outcome. I will therefore look at these notes both as a lens which can give access to the deceased’s last thoughts—or to those of her entourage if the note is fabricated—and as a lens used by judges themselves to arrive at a decisionhttps://journals.openedition.org/samaj/4481courts of lawsuicide notesdowry deathsjudicial writing
spellingShingle Daniela Berti
Suicide Notes under Judicial Scrutiny in India
South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal
courts of law
suicide notes
dowry deaths
judicial writing
title Suicide Notes under Judicial Scrutiny in India
title_full Suicide Notes under Judicial Scrutiny in India
title_fullStr Suicide Notes under Judicial Scrutiny in India
title_full_unstemmed Suicide Notes under Judicial Scrutiny in India
title_short Suicide Notes under Judicial Scrutiny in India
title_sort suicide notes under judicial scrutiny in india
topic courts of law
suicide notes
dowry deaths
judicial writing
url https://journals.openedition.org/samaj/4481
work_keys_str_mv AT danielaberti suicidenotesunderjudicialscrutinyinindia