In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Common Bacterial Keratitis Pathogens to Topical Ophthalmic Fluoroquinolones

Objective: This study determined the in vitro susceptibility of three bacterial isolates, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae, to 11 commercially available topical ophthalmic fluoroquinolones: levofloxacin (Oftaquix and Leeflox), ofloxacin (Ofbeat and Inoflox)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arabella R. Mendoza, Eleonore B. Iguban
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology 2024-06-01
Series:Philippine Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://paojournal.com/index.php/pjo/article/view/12
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850227423737544704
author Arabella R. Mendoza
Eleonore B. Iguban
author_facet Arabella R. Mendoza
Eleonore B. Iguban
author_sort Arabella R. Mendoza
collection DOAJ
description Objective: This study determined the in vitro susceptibility of three bacterial isolates, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae, to 11 commercially available topical ophthalmic fluoroquinolones: levofloxacin (Oftaquix and Leeflox), ofloxacin (Ofbeat and Inoflox), moxifloxacin (Vigamox and Vistamox), besifloxacin (Besivance), ciprofloxacin (Ciloxan and Celsus), and gatifloxacin (Zymar and Agatiflox). Methods: Zones of inhibitions in millimeters (mm) were obtained for the three bacterial isolates to assess antimicrobial activity. One-way analysis of variance was used to determine differences in antimicrobial sensitivity among treatment groups. T-test was used to detect significant differences between the innovator and the locally produced topical fluoroquinolones. Results: The three bacterial isolates were sensitive to all 11 topical ophthalmic fluoroquinolones. Ciprofloxacin (Ciloxan and Celsus) produced the largest zones of inhibition for P. aeruginosa isolates. Moxifloxacin (Vigamox and Vistamox) produced the largest zones of inhibition for S. aureus and S. pneumoniae isolates. Significant statistical differences were observed between the innovator ciprofloxacin (Ciloxan) and the locally manufactured ciprofloxacin (Celsus) when tested against P. aeruginosa, as well as between the innovator moxifloxacin (Vigamox) and the locally manufactured moxifloxacin (Vistamox) when tested against S. aureus (p<0.05). The rest of the topical ophthalmic fluoroquinolones showed no statistically significant differences between the locally manufactured and innovator brands. Conclusion: Although all the tested topical ophthalmic fluoroquinolones showed significant antimicrobial sensitivity in vitro against P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and S. pneumoniae, some of them demonstrated better antimicrobial activity towards certain organisms. Thus, it is still recommended to determine the etiology of the bacterial keratitis to optimize therapeutic management strategies. Moreover, innovator brands of moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin were found to be superior in terms of antimicrobial activity compared to locally manufactured brands against particular bacterial pathogens. This may influence treatment response and outcomes, particularly when dealing with keratitis caused by S. aureus and P. aeruginosa.
format Article
id doaj-art-1a00931d92ce4702abfee828673dc93f
institution OA Journals
issn 0031-7659
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology
record_format Article
series Philippine Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-1a00931d92ce4702abfee828673dc93f2025-08-20T02:04:51ZengPhilippine Academy of OphthalmologyPhilippine Journal of Ophthalmology0031-76592024-06-01491485312In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Common Bacterial Keratitis Pathogens to Topical Ophthalmic FluoroquinolonesArabella R. Mendoza0Eleonore B. Iguban1Department of Ophthalmology, Rizal Medical Center, PhilippinesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rizal Medical Center, PhilippinesObjective: This study determined the in vitro susceptibility of three bacterial isolates, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae, to 11 commercially available topical ophthalmic fluoroquinolones: levofloxacin (Oftaquix and Leeflox), ofloxacin (Ofbeat and Inoflox), moxifloxacin (Vigamox and Vistamox), besifloxacin (Besivance), ciprofloxacin (Ciloxan and Celsus), and gatifloxacin (Zymar and Agatiflox). Methods: Zones of inhibitions in millimeters (mm) were obtained for the three bacterial isolates to assess antimicrobial activity. One-way analysis of variance was used to determine differences in antimicrobial sensitivity among treatment groups. T-test was used to detect significant differences between the innovator and the locally produced topical fluoroquinolones. Results: The three bacterial isolates were sensitive to all 11 topical ophthalmic fluoroquinolones. Ciprofloxacin (Ciloxan and Celsus) produced the largest zones of inhibition for P. aeruginosa isolates. Moxifloxacin (Vigamox and Vistamox) produced the largest zones of inhibition for S. aureus and S. pneumoniae isolates. Significant statistical differences were observed between the innovator ciprofloxacin (Ciloxan) and the locally manufactured ciprofloxacin (Celsus) when tested against P. aeruginosa, as well as between the innovator moxifloxacin (Vigamox) and the locally manufactured moxifloxacin (Vistamox) when tested against S. aureus (p<0.05). The rest of the topical ophthalmic fluoroquinolones showed no statistically significant differences between the locally manufactured and innovator brands. Conclusion: Although all the tested topical ophthalmic fluoroquinolones showed significant antimicrobial sensitivity in vitro against P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and S. pneumoniae, some of them demonstrated better antimicrobial activity towards certain organisms. Thus, it is still recommended to determine the etiology of the bacterial keratitis to optimize therapeutic management strategies. Moreover, innovator brands of moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin were found to be superior in terms of antimicrobial activity compared to locally manufactured brands against particular bacterial pathogens. This may influence treatment response and outcomes, particularly when dealing with keratitis caused by S. aureus and P. aeruginosa.https://paojournal.com/index.php/pjo/article/view/12bacterial keratitisfluoroquinolonesantibacterial susceptibilitypseudomonas aeruginosastaphylococcus aureusstreptococcus pneumoniae
spellingShingle Arabella R. Mendoza
Eleonore B. Iguban
In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Common Bacterial Keratitis Pathogens to Topical Ophthalmic Fluoroquinolones
Philippine Journal of Ophthalmology
bacterial keratitis
fluoroquinolones
antibacterial susceptibility
pseudomonas aeruginosa
staphylococcus aureus
streptococcus pneumoniae
title In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Common Bacterial Keratitis Pathogens to Topical Ophthalmic Fluoroquinolones
title_full In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Common Bacterial Keratitis Pathogens to Topical Ophthalmic Fluoroquinolones
title_fullStr In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Common Bacterial Keratitis Pathogens to Topical Ophthalmic Fluoroquinolones
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Common Bacterial Keratitis Pathogens to Topical Ophthalmic Fluoroquinolones
title_short In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Common Bacterial Keratitis Pathogens to Topical Ophthalmic Fluoroquinolones
title_sort in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of common bacterial keratitis pathogens to topical ophthalmic fluoroquinolones
topic bacterial keratitis
fluoroquinolones
antibacterial susceptibility
pseudomonas aeruginosa
staphylococcus aureus
streptococcus pneumoniae
url https://paojournal.com/index.php/pjo/article/view/12
work_keys_str_mv AT arabellarmendoza invitroantimicrobialsusceptibilityofcommonbacterialkeratitispathogenstotopicalophthalmicfluoroquinolones
AT eleonorebiguban invitroantimicrobialsusceptibilityofcommonbacterialkeratitispathogenstotopicalophthalmicfluoroquinolones