The Dangers of Curiosity: George Herbert, an Enemy of Science?
This essay argues that the danger of curiosity for Herbert should be understood in relation to the emerging and dynamic intellectual culture of his day; a culture which, explicitly or implicitly, threatened religious belief. It first briefly discusses the perturbation resulting from the impact of ne...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institut du Monde Anglophone
2015-04-01
|
| Series: | Etudes Epistémè |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/episteme/460 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This essay argues that the danger of curiosity for Herbert should be understood in relation to the emerging and dynamic intellectual culture of his day; a culture which, explicitly or implicitly, threatened religious belief. It first briefly discusses the perturbation resulting from the impact of new learning as expressed by John Donne, a poet who greatly influenced Herbert, and then discusses Herbert’s attitude to reason (and its application, learning) in relation to faith, examining how scholars have tried to make sense of the faith/reason dichotomy in Herbert’s work. Generally speaking, they either insist on Herbert’s pro-scientific attitude or on his anti-scientific attitude. I argue that although Herbert’s early poetry expresses his attraction to the work of Francis Bacon, in Herbert’s attempts to negotiate divergent attitudes to learning a strongly anti-scientific vision predominates in The Temple. This essay examines in detail how Herbert articulates his conflicting attitudes to learning in his poetry, showing how Herbert’s admiration for learning is strongly qualified by his overriding recourse to traditional strictures against curiosity. Finally, it discusses Herbert’s relation to some of those strictures as they were expressed by Church Fathers. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1634-0450 |