Comparative Analysis of Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy Data in Preoperative Staging of Gastric Cancer

Objective: to compare the data of computed tomography (CT) and diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) in the preoperative estimation of the extension of gastric cancer.Material and methods. Data on 51 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of gastric cancer were analyzed. CT and DL were performed i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. K. Silanteva, T. A. Аgababyan, A. A. Kholeva, V. Yu. Skoropad, Z. N. Shavladze, S. A. Ivanov, L. P. Zhavoronkov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Luchevaya Diagnostika, LLC 2021-01-01
Series:Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.russianradiology.ru/jour/article/view/598
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850065861570723840
author N. K. Silanteva
T. A. Аgababyan
A. A. Kholeva
V. Yu. Skoropad
Z. N. Shavladze
S. A. Ivanov
L. P. Zhavoronkov
author_facet N. K. Silanteva
T. A. Аgababyan
A. A. Kholeva
V. Yu. Skoropad
Z. N. Shavladze
S. A. Ivanov
L. P. Zhavoronkov
author_sort N. K. Silanteva
collection DOAJ
description Objective: to compare the data of computed tomography (CT) and diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) in the preoperative estimation of the extension of gastric cancer.Material and methods. Data on 51 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of gastric cancer were analyzed. CT and DL were performed in all the patients at an interval of 1–2 days during their preoperative examinations to determine the stage of a tumor process. Of the 51 patients, 34 (66.7%) were found to have no distant abdominal metastases and underwent radical surgery. CT and DL revealed distant abdominal organ metastases in 17 (33.3%) of the 51 patients. To evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of CT and DL, the investigators calculated the main characteristics (sensitivity, specificity) and auxiliary criteria (accuracy, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values.Results. The findings suggested that the diagnostic efficiency of CT in determining the T category was a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 92%; and that of DL was 83% and 87%, respectively. CT in diagnosing a regional lymph node metastasis had a higher sensitivity than DL (88% vs. 63%), but a lower specificity than DL (80% vs. 90%). CT diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis exhibited a sensitivity of 46%, a specificity of 97.4%, an accuracy of 84.3%, PPV of 85.7%, and NPV of 84.1%. The symptoms of peritoneal carcinomatosis were ascites, soft tissue nodules along the peritoneum, diffuse induration and thickening of abdominal tissue planes, and increased mesenteric vascularity.Conclusion. The combined use of CT and DL is a current algorithm for examining patients with gastric cancer. It makes it possible to obtain complete information about the extension of the process, to increase the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis and to form a group of patients to undergo radical surgery.
format Article
id doaj-art-198ccdc4516f4e248bd95f07383ce846
institution DOAJ
issn 0042-4676
2619-0478
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Luchevaya Diagnostika, LLC
record_format Article
series Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии
spelling doaj-art-198ccdc4516f4e248bd95f07383ce8462025-08-20T02:48:54ZengLuchevaya Diagnostika, LLCВестник рентгенологии и радиологии0042-46762619-04782021-01-01101633334310.20862/0042-4676-2020-101-6-333-343355Comparative Analysis of Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy Data in Preoperative Staging of Gastric CancerN. K. Silanteva0T. A. Аgababyan1A. A. Kholeva2V. Yu. Skoropad3Z. N. Shavladze4S. A. Ivanov5L. P. Zhavoronkov6Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationTsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationTsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationTsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationTsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationTsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationTsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationObjective: to compare the data of computed tomography (CT) and diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) in the preoperative estimation of the extension of gastric cancer.Material and methods. Data on 51 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of gastric cancer were analyzed. CT and DL were performed in all the patients at an interval of 1–2 days during their preoperative examinations to determine the stage of a tumor process. Of the 51 patients, 34 (66.7%) were found to have no distant abdominal metastases and underwent radical surgery. CT and DL revealed distant abdominal organ metastases in 17 (33.3%) of the 51 patients. To evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of CT and DL, the investigators calculated the main characteristics (sensitivity, specificity) and auxiliary criteria (accuracy, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values.Results. The findings suggested that the diagnostic efficiency of CT in determining the T category was a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 92%; and that of DL was 83% and 87%, respectively. CT in diagnosing a regional lymph node metastasis had a higher sensitivity than DL (88% vs. 63%), but a lower specificity than DL (80% vs. 90%). CT diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis exhibited a sensitivity of 46%, a specificity of 97.4%, an accuracy of 84.3%, PPV of 85.7%, and NPV of 84.1%. The symptoms of peritoneal carcinomatosis were ascites, soft tissue nodules along the peritoneum, diffuse induration and thickening of abdominal tissue planes, and increased mesenteric vascularity.Conclusion. The combined use of CT and DL is a current algorithm for examining patients with gastric cancer. It makes it possible to obtain complete information about the extension of the process, to increase the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis and to form a group of patients to undergo radical surgery.https://www.russianradiology.ru/jour/article/view/598gastric cancercomputed tomographydiagnostic laparoscopy
spellingShingle N. K. Silanteva
T. A. Аgababyan
A. A. Kholeva
V. Yu. Skoropad
Z. N. Shavladze
S. A. Ivanov
L. P. Zhavoronkov
Comparative Analysis of Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy Data in Preoperative Staging of Gastric Cancer
Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии
gastric cancer
computed tomography
diagnostic laparoscopy
title Comparative Analysis of Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy Data in Preoperative Staging of Gastric Cancer
title_full Comparative Analysis of Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy Data in Preoperative Staging of Gastric Cancer
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy Data in Preoperative Staging of Gastric Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy Data in Preoperative Staging of Gastric Cancer
title_short Comparative Analysis of Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy Data in Preoperative Staging of Gastric Cancer
title_sort comparative analysis of computed tomography and laparoscopy data in preoperative staging of gastric cancer
topic gastric cancer
computed tomography
diagnostic laparoscopy
url https://www.russianradiology.ru/jour/article/view/598
work_keys_str_mv AT nksilanteva comparativeanalysisofcomputedtomographyandlaparoscopydatainpreoperativestagingofgastriccancer
AT taagababyan comparativeanalysisofcomputedtomographyandlaparoscopydatainpreoperativestagingofgastriccancer
AT aakholeva comparativeanalysisofcomputedtomographyandlaparoscopydatainpreoperativestagingofgastriccancer
AT vyuskoropad comparativeanalysisofcomputedtomographyandlaparoscopydatainpreoperativestagingofgastriccancer
AT znshavladze comparativeanalysisofcomputedtomographyandlaparoscopydatainpreoperativestagingofgastriccancer
AT saivanov comparativeanalysisofcomputedtomographyandlaparoscopydatainpreoperativestagingofgastriccancer
AT lpzhavoronkov comparativeanalysisofcomputedtomographyandlaparoscopydatainpreoperativestagingofgastriccancer