Response to letter to the editor, “Observational studies on glucocorticoid harm should always consider confounding by indication.”
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Patricia Katz, Kaleb Michaud |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | ACR Open Rheumatology |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.70037 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Observational studies on glucocorticoid harm should always consider confounding by indication: comment on the article Katz et al
by: Maarten Boers
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Response to “Letter to the Editor: Calcium as a confounding variable in phosphorus attribution” in As-hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata
by: Chun-Yan Hu, et al.
Published: (2025-10-01) -
Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Should all trainees “do research”?
by: Luis Martí-Bonmatí
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Expanded response letter to “Hemodialysis dose and frequency should be considered in the subgroup analysis”
by: Li-Chun Lin, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Letter to the Editor: There Should Be a Clear Distinction Between Legitimate Protest and Antisemitism
by: Yasmeen Abu Fraiha, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01)