Littérature dissidente ou tributaire de la polémique réformée ?

Three well-known cases of sixteenth-century dissidence, Jacques Gruet, Noël Journet and Geoffroy Vallée, are examined for the resemblance their attitudes bear to reformed polemic in order to suggest that they represent less of a break with mainstream thinking at their time than has previously been c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: George Hoffmann
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Groupe de Recherches Interdisciplinaires sur l'Histoire du Littéraire 2013-03-01
Series:Les Dossiers du GRIHL
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/dossiersgrihl/5570
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849309643619172352
author George Hoffmann
author_facet George Hoffmann
author_sort George Hoffmann
collection DOAJ
description Three well-known cases of sixteenth-century dissidence, Jacques Gruet, Noël Journet and Geoffroy Vallée, are examined for the resemblance their attitudes bear to reformed polemic in order to suggest that they represent less of a break with mainstream thinking at their time than has previously been claimed. This finding allows one to return to Carlo Ginzburg’s work and debates it has occasioned. Was Renaissance dissidence an independent movement or merely a side-effect of the Reformation?
format Article
id doaj-art-190b11f390414563b7dc9151ffbdda66
institution Kabale University
issn 1958-9247
language fra
publishDate 2013-03-01
publisher Groupe de Recherches Interdisciplinaires sur l'Histoire du Littéraire
record_format Article
series Les Dossiers du GRIHL
spelling doaj-art-190b11f390414563b7dc9151ffbdda662025-08-20T03:54:01ZfraGroupe de Recherches Interdisciplinaires sur l'Histoire du LittéraireLes Dossiers du GRIHL1958-92472013-03-01710.4000/dossiersgrihl.5570Littérature dissidente ou tributaire de la polémique réformée ?George HoffmannThree well-known cases of sixteenth-century dissidence, Jacques Gruet, Noël Journet and Geoffroy Vallée, are examined for the resemblance their attitudes bear to reformed polemic in order to suggest that they represent less of a break with mainstream thinking at their time than has previously been claimed. This finding allows one to return to Carlo Ginzburg’s work and debates it has occasioned. Was Renaissance dissidence an independent movement or merely a side-effect of the Reformation?https://journals.openedition.org/dossiersgrihl/5570Badius (Conrad)Bèze(Théodore de)Busson (Henri)Calvin (Jean)Fevbre (Lucien)
spellingShingle George Hoffmann
Littérature dissidente ou tributaire de la polémique réformée ?
Les Dossiers du GRIHL
Badius (Conrad)
Bèze
(Théodore de)
Busson (Henri)
Calvin (Jean)
Fevbre (Lucien)
title Littérature dissidente ou tributaire de la polémique réformée ?
title_full Littérature dissidente ou tributaire de la polémique réformée ?
title_fullStr Littérature dissidente ou tributaire de la polémique réformée ?
title_full_unstemmed Littérature dissidente ou tributaire de la polémique réformée ?
title_short Littérature dissidente ou tributaire de la polémique réformée ?
title_sort litterature dissidente ou tributaire de la polemique reformee
topic Badius (Conrad)
Bèze
(Théodore de)
Busson (Henri)
Calvin (Jean)
Fevbre (Lucien)
url https://journals.openedition.org/dossiersgrihl/5570
work_keys_str_mv AT georgehoffmann litteraturedissidenteoutributairedelapolemiquereformee