Comparison and Correction of Runoff Simulation Based on XGBoost and SWAT
Runoff simulation has always been a research hotspot in hydrological science, which has important guiding significance for water resources research. Based on the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm and soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model, a runoff simulation model was constructed b...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | zho |
Published: |
Editorial Office of Pearl River
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Renmin Zhujiang |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.renminzhujiang.cn/thesisDetails#10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2025.01.006 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823864823514923008 |
---|---|
author | LIANG Lisha JIANG Xiaolei HU Leyi SHEN Jing ZHANG Liping FU Xiaolei |
author_facet | LIANG Lisha JIANG Xiaolei HU Leyi SHEN Jing ZHANG Liping FU Xiaolei |
author_sort | LIANG Lisha |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Runoff simulation has always been a research hotspot in hydrological science, which has important guiding significance for water resources research. Based on the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm and soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model, a runoff simulation model was constructed by using the observed hydrological data of Waizhou hydrological station in Ganjiang River Basin, and the simulation effects of the two models were compared. Meanwhile, based on the XGBoost model, the residual correction method was used to correct the runoff simulation results of the SWAT model. The results show that: ① The simulation effect of the XGBoost model is good, and the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of daily runoff simulation of the XGBoost model is 15.66% higher than that of the SWAT model. ② The SWAT model is underestimated at high flow rates, while the XGBoost model results in basically consistent simulation values and observed values, and the simulated hydrograph has a high degree of fitting, showing a good correlation. ③ After XGBoost correction, the simulation accuracy of the SWAT model is obviously improved, which can effectively improve the runoff simulation effect. When the residual error is corrected, the NSE value of runoff simulation can reach 0.96, an increase of 15.66%. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-1901e17445bd48bc98e4c5a7414594b0 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1001-9235 |
language | zho |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Editorial Office of Pearl River |
record_format | Article |
series | Renmin Zhujiang |
spelling | doaj-art-1901e17445bd48bc98e4c5a7414594b02025-02-08T19:00:05ZzhoEditorial Office of Pearl RiverRenmin Zhujiang1001-92352025-01-0146505875885521Comparison and Correction of Runoff Simulation Based on XGBoost and SWATLIANG LishaJIANG XiaoleiHU LeyiSHEN JingZHANG LipingFU XiaoleiRunoff simulation has always been a research hotspot in hydrological science, which has important guiding significance for water resources research. Based on the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm and soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model, a runoff simulation model was constructed by using the observed hydrological data of Waizhou hydrological station in Ganjiang River Basin, and the simulation effects of the two models were compared. Meanwhile, based on the XGBoost model, the residual correction method was used to correct the runoff simulation results of the SWAT model. The results show that: ① The simulation effect of the XGBoost model is good, and the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of daily runoff simulation of the XGBoost model is 15.66% higher than that of the SWAT model. ② The SWAT model is underestimated at high flow rates, while the XGBoost model results in basically consistent simulation values and observed values, and the simulated hydrograph has a high degree of fitting, showing a good correlation. ③ After XGBoost correction, the simulation accuracy of the SWAT model is obviously improved, which can effectively improve the runoff simulation effect. When the residual error is corrected, the NSE value of runoff simulation can reach 0.96, an increase of 15.66%.http://www.renminzhujiang.cn/thesisDetails#10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2025.01.006XGBoostSWATrunoff simulationerror correction |
spellingShingle | LIANG Lisha JIANG Xiaolei HU Leyi SHEN Jing ZHANG Liping FU Xiaolei Comparison and Correction of Runoff Simulation Based on XGBoost and SWAT Renmin Zhujiang XGBoost SWAT runoff simulation error correction |
title | Comparison and Correction of Runoff Simulation Based on XGBoost and SWAT |
title_full | Comparison and Correction of Runoff Simulation Based on XGBoost and SWAT |
title_fullStr | Comparison and Correction of Runoff Simulation Based on XGBoost and SWAT |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison and Correction of Runoff Simulation Based on XGBoost and SWAT |
title_short | Comparison and Correction of Runoff Simulation Based on XGBoost and SWAT |
title_sort | comparison and correction of runoff simulation based on xgboost and swat |
topic | XGBoost SWAT runoff simulation error correction |
url | http://www.renminzhujiang.cn/thesisDetails#10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2025.01.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lianglisha comparisonandcorrectionofrunoffsimulationbasedonxgboostandswat AT jiangxiaolei comparisonandcorrectionofrunoffsimulationbasedonxgboostandswat AT huleyi comparisonandcorrectionofrunoffsimulationbasedonxgboostandswat AT shenjing comparisonandcorrectionofrunoffsimulationbasedonxgboostandswat AT zhangliping comparisonandcorrectionofrunoffsimulationbasedonxgboostandswat AT fuxiaolei comparisonandcorrectionofrunoffsimulationbasedonxgboostandswat |