Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Telemedicine in Ophthalmology in a Tertiary Hospital A Cross-Sectional Survey

Objective: The purposes of this study were to (1) describe the perceptions and practices of telemedicine among ophthalmologists in a tertiary hospital; and (2) evaluate knowledge, satisfaction, and perceived patient outcomes in using telemedicine to provide eye care in a time of a global pandemic....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angelica Antoinette C. Vega, MD, Sherman O. Valero, MD, DPBO
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology 2021-12-01
Series:Philippine Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://paojournal.com/index.php/pjo/article/view/70
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: The purposes of this study were to (1) describe the perceptions and practices of telemedicine among ophthalmologists in a tertiary hospital; and (2) evaluate knowledge, satisfaction, and perceived patient outcomes in using telemedicine to provide eye care in a time of a global pandemic. Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study using a self-administered online survey. Thirty-two (32) ophthalmology consultants and residents-in-training in a single tertiary, private hospital who practiced telemedicine participated in this study. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize the data. Responses to open-ended questions were analyzed thematically. Results: The respondents were somewhat knowledgeable (75%) and somewhat confident (72%) in using telemedicine. Respondents strongly conveyed their satisfaction with telemedicine outcomes (56%). Majority also believed that their patients were satisfied with teleconsults (69%). Majority agreed that telemedicine can be effective for select types of care [i.e., chronic condition management (66%), follow- up care (62%), and acute non-emergency care (53%)]. Telemedicine also proved to be a boon during a pandemic due to its convenience (59%) and efficiency (63%). However, it is limited by the imperative need for face-to-face consults (69%) and technological constraints (44%). Conclusions: Telemedicine was perceived to be a valuable solution during the present pandemic due to its convenience, safety, and ability to provide remote diagnosis and management of urgent and non-urgent cases. Although the current practice of telemedicine still has plenty of room for improvements in the standardization of training, connectivity and technological constraints, and addressing liability concerns, it can serve as an adjunct to face-to face consultations to provide optimal care for patients.
ISSN:0031-7659