Comparative Analysis of Recurrent vs. Temporal Convolutional Autoencoders for Detecting Container Impacts During Quay Crane Handling

This research develops and validates a novel impact detection system for container monitoring using autoencoders embedded within an edge computing unit. This solution addresses common limitations in current container tracking systems, such as a lack of real-time processing and reliance on cloud conn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sergej Jakovlev, Tomas Eglynas, Edvinas Pocevicius, Miroslav Voznak, Gediminas Gricius, Valdas Jankunas, Mindaugas Jusis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/13/7/1231
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849418110162960384
author Sergej Jakovlev
Tomas Eglynas
Edvinas Pocevicius
Miroslav Voznak
Gediminas Gricius
Valdas Jankunas
Mindaugas Jusis
author_facet Sergej Jakovlev
Tomas Eglynas
Edvinas Pocevicius
Miroslav Voznak
Gediminas Gricius
Valdas Jankunas
Mindaugas Jusis
author_sort Sergej Jakovlev
collection DOAJ
description This research develops and validates a novel impact detection system for container monitoring using autoencoders embedded within an edge computing unit. This solution addresses common limitations in current container tracking systems, such as a lack of real-time processing and reliance on cloud connectivity, by enabling local, on-device anomaly detection. We compare the performance of Recurrent Autoencoders (RAEs) and Temporal Convolutional Autoencoders (TCAEs) using acceleration data collected during quay crane handling. Experimental results show that the RAE framework outperforms TCAEs, achieving a precision of 91.3%, a recall of 87.6%, and an F1-score of 89.4% for impact detection while also demonstrating lower reconstruction loss and improved detection of sequential anomalies. The system accurately identifies impact events with minimal computational overhead, proving its viability for real-time deployment in port environments. Our findings suggest that time-series autoencoder architectures, particularly RAEs, are effective for detecting mechanical impacts in resource-constrained edge devices, offering a robust alternative to traditional cloud-based solutions.
format Article
id doaj-art-18502f1e95f9462895ee2e34c01eef84
institution Kabale University
issn 2077-1312
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
spelling doaj-art-18502f1e95f9462895ee2e34c01eef842025-08-20T03:32:32ZengMDPI AGJournal of Marine Science and Engineering2077-13122025-06-01137123110.3390/jmse13071231Comparative Analysis of Recurrent vs. Temporal Convolutional Autoencoders for Detecting Container Impacts During Quay Crane HandlingSergej Jakovlev0Tomas Eglynas1Edvinas Pocevicius2Miroslav Voznak3Gediminas Gricius4Valdas Jankunas5Mindaugas Jusis6Department of Telecommunications, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 2172/15, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech RepublicMarine Research Institute, Klaipeda University, Universiteto al. 17, 92295 Klaipeda, LithuaniaDepartment of Marine Engineering, Klaipeda University, Bijunu Str. 17, 91225 Klaipeda, LithuaniaDepartment of Telecommunications, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 2172/15, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech RepublicDepartment of Informatics and Statistics, Klaipeda University, Bijunu Str. 17, 91225 Klaipeda, LithuaniaMarine Research Institute, Klaipeda University, Universiteto al. 17, 92295 Klaipeda, LithuaniaDepartment of Informatics and Statistics, Klaipeda University, Bijunu Str. 17, 91225 Klaipeda, LithuaniaThis research develops and validates a novel impact detection system for container monitoring using autoencoders embedded within an edge computing unit. This solution addresses common limitations in current container tracking systems, such as a lack of real-time processing and reliance on cloud connectivity, by enabling local, on-device anomaly detection. We compare the performance of Recurrent Autoencoders (RAEs) and Temporal Convolutional Autoencoders (TCAEs) using acceleration data collected during quay crane handling. Experimental results show that the RAE framework outperforms TCAEs, achieving a precision of 91.3%, a recall of 87.6%, and an F1-score of 89.4% for impact detection while also demonstrating lower reconstruction loss and improved detection of sequential anomalies. The system accurately identifies impact events with minimal computational overhead, proving its viability for real-time deployment in port environments. Our findings suggest that time-series autoencoder architectures, particularly RAEs, are effective for detecting mechanical impacts in resource-constrained edge devices, offering a robust alternative to traditional cloud-based solutions.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/13/7/1231autoencoderimpact detectionaccelerator
spellingShingle Sergej Jakovlev
Tomas Eglynas
Edvinas Pocevicius
Miroslav Voznak
Gediminas Gricius
Valdas Jankunas
Mindaugas Jusis
Comparative Analysis of Recurrent vs. Temporal Convolutional Autoencoders for Detecting Container Impacts During Quay Crane Handling
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
autoencoder
impact detection
accelerator
title Comparative Analysis of Recurrent vs. Temporal Convolutional Autoencoders for Detecting Container Impacts During Quay Crane Handling
title_full Comparative Analysis of Recurrent vs. Temporal Convolutional Autoencoders for Detecting Container Impacts During Quay Crane Handling
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Recurrent vs. Temporal Convolutional Autoencoders for Detecting Container Impacts During Quay Crane Handling
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Recurrent vs. Temporal Convolutional Autoencoders for Detecting Container Impacts During Quay Crane Handling
title_short Comparative Analysis of Recurrent vs. Temporal Convolutional Autoencoders for Detecting Container Impacts During Quay Crane Handling
title_sort comparative analysis of recurrent vs temporal convolutional autoencoders for detecting container impacts during quay crane handling
topic autoencoder
impact detection
accelerator
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/13/7/1231
work_keys_str_mv AT sergejjakovlev comparativeanalysisofrecurrentvstemporalconvolutionalautoencodersfordetectingcontainerimpactsduringquaycranehandling
AT tomaseglynas comparativeanalysisofrecurrentvstemporalconvolutionalautoencodersfordetectingcontainerimpactsduringquaycranehandling
AT edvinaspocevicius comparativeanalysisofrecurrentvstemporalconvolutionalautoencodersfordetectingcontainerimpactsduringquaycranehandling
AT miroslavvoznak comparativeanalysisofrecurrentvstemporalconvolutionalautoencodersfordetectingcontainerimpactsduringquaycranehandling
AT gediminasgricius comparativeanalysisofrecurrentvstemporalconvolutionalautoencodersfordetectingcontainerimpactsduringquaycranehandling
AT valdasjankunas comparativeanalysisofrecurrentvstemporalconvolutionalautoencodersfordetectingcontainerimpactsduringquaycranehandling
AT mindaugasjusis comparativeanalysisofrecurrentvstemporalconvolutionalautoencodersfordetectingcontainerimpactsduringquaycranehandling