Investigating Life Cycle Cost, Environmental and Social Impacts of a Lithium–Ion Battery Pack

This study evaluates the environmental, economic, and social impacts of the life cycle of a battery pack for automotive applications. The analysis employs Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for environmental assessment, Life Cycle Costing (LCC) for economic assessment, and Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-L...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonella Accardo, Gaia Gentilucci, Luca Pontone, Ezio Spessa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2025-01-01
Series:IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11031181/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849427183787835392
author Antonella Accardo
Gaia Gentilucci
Luca Pontone
Ezio Spessa
author_facet Antonella Accardo
Gaia Gentilucci
Luca Pontone
Ezio Spessa
author_sort Antonella Accardo
collection DOAJ
description This study evaluates the environmental, economic, and social impacts of the life cycle of a battery pack for automotive applications. The analysis employs Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for environmental assessment, Life Cycle Costing (LCC) for economic assessment, and Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) for social impact analysis. Key locations of non-European raw material extraction and refining are considered for the supply chain. Instead, European countries are considered the final destination for battery pack manufacturing and assembly, use, and End-of-Life (EoL). For the use and EoL phases, three scenarios are analyzed. The LCA results indicate that greenhouse gas emissions vary from 77.2 kg CO<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$_{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula> -eq/kWh to 80.7 kg CO<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$_{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula>-eq/kWh across the evaluated scenarios. Similarly, the economic assessment estimates LCCs between 77.7 EUR/kWh and 79.4 EUR/kWh, depending on the scenario. The S-LCA results highlight significant risks related to fair pay across numerous countries during the raw material extraction phase, particularly for cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo), manganese (South Africa), nickel (Australia), lithium (Australia), and graphite (China). In addition, the score for health and safety concerns presents high risks associated with cobalt, manganese, and nickel mining. In contrast, no significant critical social impacts are found for the use and EoL phases.
format Article
id doaj-art-17ffc9cf36464263b5d7d12fa5699ffb
institution Kabale University
issn 2644-1330
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IEEE
record_format Article
series IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology
spelling doaj-art-17ffc9cf36464263b5d7d12fa5699ffb2025-08-20T03:29:06ZengIEEEIEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology2644-13302025-01-0161698170910.1109/OJVT.2025.357922111031181Investigating Life Cycle Cost, Environmental and Social Impacts of a Lithium&#x2013;Ion Battery PackAntonella Accardo0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9132-8391Gaia Gentilucci1https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2372-0209Luca Pontone2https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3077-5718Ezio Spessa3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5236-619XDepartment of Energy, Polytechnic of Turin, Turin, ItalyDepartment of Energy, Polytechnic of Turin, Turin, ItalyDepartment of Energy, Polytechnic of Turin, Turin, ItalyDepartment of Energy, Polytechnic of Turin, Turin, ItalyThis study evaluates the environmental, economic, and social impacts of the life cycle of a battery pack for automotive applications. The analysis employs Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for environmental assessment, Life Cycle Costing (LCC) for economic assessment, and Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) for social impact analysis. Key locations of non-European raw material extraction and refining are considered for the supply chain. Instead, European countries are considered the final destination for battery pack manufacturing and assembly, use, and End-of-Life (EoL). For the use and EoL phases, three scenarios are analyzed. The LCA results indicate that greenhouse gas emissions vary from 77.2 kg CO<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$_{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula> -eq/kWh to 80.7 kg CO<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$_{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula>-eq/kWh across the evaluated scenarios. Similarly, the economic assessment estimates LCCs between 77.7 EUR/kWh and 79.4 EUR/kWh, depending on the scenario. The S-LCA results highlight significant risks related to fair pay across numerous countries during the raw material extraction phase, particularly for cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo), manganese (South Africa), nickel (Australia), lithium (Australia), and graphite (China). In addition, the score for health and safety concerns presents high risks associated with cobalt, manganese, and nickel mining. In contrast, no significant critical social impacts are found for the use and EoL phases.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11031181/Life cycle assessment (LCA)life cycle costing (LCC)social life cycle assessment (S-LCA)batteryelectric vehicles
spellingShingle Antonella Accardo
Gaia Gentilucci
Luca Pontone
Ezio Spessa
Investigating Life Cycle Cost, Environmental and Social Impacts of a Lithium&#x2013;Ion Battery Pack
IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology
Life cycle assessment (LCA)
life cycle costing (LCC)
social life cycle assessment (S-LCA)
battery
electric vehicles
title Investigating Life Cycle Cost, Environmental and Social Impacts of a Lithium&#x2013;Ion Battery Pack
title_full Investigating Life Cycle Cost, Environmental and Social Impacts of a Lithium&#x2013;Ion Battery Pack
title_fullStr Investigating Life Cycle Cost, Environmental and Social Impacts of a Lithium&#x2013;Ion Battery Pack
title_full_unstemmed Investigating Life Cycle Cost, Environmental and Social Impacts of a Lithium&#x2013;Ion Battery Pack
title_short Investigating Life Cycle Cost, Environmental and Social Impacts of a Lithium&#x2013;Ion Battery Pack
title_sort investigating life cycle cost environmental and social impacts of a lithium x2013 ion battery pack
topic Life cycle assessment (LCA)
life cycle costing (LCC)
social life cycle assessment (S-LCA)
battery
electric vehicles
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11031181/
work_keys_str_mv AT antonellaaccardo investigatinglifecyclecostenvironmentalandsocialimpactsofalithiumx2013ionbatterypack
AT gaiagentilucci investigatinglifecyclecostenvironmentalandsocialimpactsofalithiumx2013ionbatterypack
AT lucapontone investigatinglifecyclecostenvironmentalandsocialimpactsofalithiumx2013ionbatterypack
AT eziospessa investigatinglifecyclecostenvironmentalandsocialimpactsofalithiumx2013ionbatterypack