Comparison of numerical model, neural intelligent and GeoStatistical in estimating groundwater table
Modeling provides the studying of groundwater managers as an efficient method with the lowest cost. The purpose of this study was comparison of the numerical model, neural intelligent and geostatistical in groundwater table changes modeling. The information of Hamedan – Bahar aquifer was studied as...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Kharazmi University
2018-03-01
|
| Series: | تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2861-en.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832575770905542656 |
|---|---|
| author | Maryam Bayatvarkeshi Rojin Fasihi |
| author_facet | Maryam Bayatvarkeshi Rojin Fasihi |
| author_sort | Maryam Bayatvarkeshi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Modeling provides the studying of groundwater managers as an efficient method with the lowest cost. The purpose of this study was comparison of the numerical model, neural intelligent and geostatistical in groundwater table changes modeling. The information of Hamedan – Bahar aquifer was studied as one of the most important water sources in Hamedan province. In this study, MODFLOW numerical code in GMS software, artificial neural network (ANN) and neural – fuzzy (CANFIS) method in NeuroSolution software, wavelet-neural method in MATLAB software and geostatistical method in ArcGIS software were used. The results showed that the accuracy of methods in estimation of the groundwater table with the lowest Normal Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) include Wavelet-ANN, CANFIS, geostatistical, ANN and numerical model, respectively. The NRMSE value in Wavelet-ANN method as optimization method was 0.11 % and in numerical model was 2.2 %. Also the correlation coefficients were 0.998 and 0.904, respectively. So application of neural combination models, specially, wavelet theory in estimated the groundwater table is most suitable than geostatistical and numerical model. Moreover, in the neural intelligent models were applied latitude, longitude and altitude as available variables in input models. The zoning results of groundwater table indicated that the decreased trend of groundwater table was from the west to the east of aquifer which was in line with the hydraulic gradient. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-17d2195dc46e4614831e6bd1674f01f0 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2228-7736 2588-5138 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2018-03-01 |
| publisher | Kharazmi University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی |
| spelling | doaj-art-17d2195dc46e4614831e6bd1674f01f02025-01-31T17:24:18ZfasKharazmi Universityتحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی2228-77362588-51382018-03-011848165182Comparison of numerical model, neural intelligent and GeoStatistical in estimating groundwater tableMaryam Bayatvarkeshi0Rojin Fasihi1 malayer university malayer university Modeling provides the studying of groundwater managers as an efficient method with the lowest cost. The purpose of this study was comparison of the numerical model, neural intelligent and geostatistical in groundwater table changes modeling. The information of Hamedan – Bahar aquifer was studied as one of the most important water sources in Hamedan province. In this study, MODFLOW numerical code in GMS software, artificial neural network (ANN) and neural – fuzzy (CANFIS) method in NeuroSolution software, wavelet-neural method in MATLAB software and geostatistical method in ArcGIS software were used. The results showed that the accuracy of methods in estimation of the groundwater table with the lowest Normal Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) include Wavelet-ANN, CANFIS, geostatistical, ANN and numerical model, respectively. The NRMSE value in Wavelet-ANN method as optimization method was 0.11 % and in numerical model was 2.2 %. Also the correlation coefficients were 0.998 and 0.904, respectively. So application of neural combination models, specially, wavelet theory in estimated the groundwater table is most suitable than geostatistical and numerical model. Moreover, in the neural intelligent models were applied latitude, longitude and altitude as available variables in input models. The zoning results of groundwater table indicated that the decreased trend of groundwater table was from the west to the east of aquifer which was in line with the hydraulic gradient.http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2861-en.pdfnumerical modelcanfiswavelet-anngeostatisticalgroundwater table |
| spellingShingle | Maryam Bayatvarkeshi Rojin Fasihi Comparison of numerical model, neural intelligent and GeoStatistical in estimating groundwater table تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی numerical model canfis wavelet-ann geostatistical groundwater table |
| title | Comparison of numerical model, neural intelligent and GeoStatistical in estimating groundwater table |
| title_full | Comparison of numerical model, neural intelligent and GeoStatistical in estimating groundwater table |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of numerical model, neural intelligent and GeoStatistical in estimating groundwater table |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of numerical model, neural intelligent and GeoStatistical in estimating groundwater table |
| title_short | Comparison of numerical model, neural intelligent and GeoStatistical in estimating groundwater table |
| title_sort | comparison of numerical model neural intelligent and geostatistical in estimating groundwater table |
| topic | numerical model canfis wavelet-ann geostatistical groundwater table |
| url | http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2861-en.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT maryambayatvarkeshi comparisonofnumericalmodelneuralintelligentandgeostatisticalinestimatinggroundwatertable AT rojinfasihi comparisonofnumericalmodelneuralintelligentandgeostatisticalinestimatinggroundwatertable |