Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided dextrose 25% hypertonic prolotherapy and intra-articular normal saline injection on pain, functional limitation, and range of motion in patients with knee osteoarthritis; a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background and aims Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating condition that manifests as knee pain and dysfunction. Clinicians prefer non-surgical options such as intra-articular injections for mild to moderate disease. Dextrose prolotherapy (DPTx) has been shown to have a beneficial effe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alireza Teymouri, Nafiseh Birang, Maryamsadat Fakheri, Aref Nasiri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-03-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08580-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850269830018498560
author Alireza Teymouri
Nafiseh Birang
Maryamsadat Fakheri
Aref Nasiri
author_facet Alireza Teymouri
Nafiseh Birang
Maryamsadat Fakheri
Aref Nasiri
author_sort Alireza Teymouri
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background and aims Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating condition that manifests as knee pain and dysfunction. Clinicians prefer non-surgical options such as intra-articular injections for mild to moderate disease. Dextrose prolotherapy (DPTx) has been shown to have a beneficial effect on knee OA in the long-term. In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), we aimed to compare DPTx with intra-articular normal saline injection (IA-NS) to treat knee OA in terms of effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes. Methods The study was a double-blind RCT with an allocation ratio of 1:1. We used block randomization to assign patients to each treatment arm. Patients with a visual analog scale of at least 4 for pain, and a Kellgren–Lawrence scale of grade 2 or 3 (mild or moderate disease) were selected and assessed according to eligibility criteria. The participants received either 5 ml of 50% dextrose water or 5 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride. The patients were followed up at 2, 4, and 8 weeks. SPSS software was used for statistical analyses. All results were reported with a confidence interval of 95%, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results Overall, 55 patients were included in the study, but 50 completed the study process (25 patients in each treatment arm). The mean age of patients with knee OA was 62.98 ± 5.37, ranging from 55 to 74 years. We observed significant improvement in both groups in terms of knee pain, function, and knee extension degree at all follow-up visits (p < 0.001). Although DPTx was associated with better results than IA-NS, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The adverse events were limited to injection-site pain and ecchymosis, which resolved by week 4. Conclusion Although we achieved slightly better results with DPTx, this treatment technique was not clinically or statistically superior to IA-NS in terms of knee pain and function in the short-term. Therefore, both DPTx and IA-NS are effective and well tolerated treatment options for knee OA. However, more RCTs are needed to confirm these claims.
format Article
id doaj-art-17cf1c5f053c47c8a2f17dd020be4a22
institution OA Journals
issn 1471-2474
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj-art-17cf1c5f053c47c8a2f17dd020be4a222025-08-20T01:52:55ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742025-03-012611910.1186/s12891-025-08580-5Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided dextrose 25% hypertonic prolotherapy and intra-articular normal saline injection on pain, functional limitation, and range of motion in patients with knee osteoarthritis; a randomized controlled trialAlireza Teymouri0Nafiseh Birang1Maryamsadat Fakheri2Aref Nasiri3Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical SciencesAbstract Background and aims Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating condition that manifests as knee pain and dysfunction. Clinicians prefer non-surgical options such as intra-articular injections for mild to moderate disease. Dextrose prolotherapy (DPTx) has been shown to have a beneficial effect on knee OA in the long-term. In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), we aimed to compare DPTx with intra-articular normal saline injection (IA-NS) to treat knee OA in terms of effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes. Methods The study was a double-blind RCT with an allocation ratio of 1:1. We used block randomization to assign patients to each treatment arm. Patients with a visual analog scale of at least 4 for pain, and a Kellgren–Lawrence scale of grade 2 or 3 (mild or moderate disease) were selected and assessed according to eligibility criteria. The participants received either 5 ml of 50% dextrose water or 5 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride. The patients were followed up at 2, 4, and 8 weeks. SPSS software was used for statistical analyses. All results were reported with a confidence interval of 95%, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results Overall, 55 patients were included in the study, but 50 completed the study process (25 patients in each treatment arm). The mean age of patients with knee OA was 62.98 ± 5.37, ranging from 55 to 74 years. We observed significant improvement in both groups in terms of knee pain, function, and knee extension degree at all follow-up visits (p < 0.001). Although DPTx was associated with better results than IA-NS, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The adverse events were limited to injection-site pain and ecchymosis, which resolved by week 4. Conclusion Although we achieved slightly better results with DPTx, this treatment technique was not clinically or statistically superior to IA-NS in terms of knee pain and function in the short-term. Therefore, both DPTx and IA-NS are effective and well tolerated treatment options for knee OA. However, more RCTs are needed to confirm these claims.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08580-5OsteoarthritisKneeProlotherapyDextroseIntra-articular normal saline injection
spellingShingle Alireza Teymouri
Nafiseh Birang
Maryamsadat Fakheri
Aref Nasiri
Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided dextrose 25% hypertonic prolotherapy and intra-articular normal saline injection on pain, functional limitation, and range of motion in patients with knee osteoarthritis; a randomized controlled trial
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Osteoarthritis
Knee
Prolotherapy
Dextrose
Intra-articular normal saline injection
title Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided dextrose 25% hypertonic prolotherapy and intra-articular normal saline injection on pain, functional limitation, and range of motion in patients with knee osteoarthritis; a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided dextrose 25% hypertonic prolotherapy and intra-articular normal saline injection on pain, functional limitation, and range of motion in patients with knee osteoarthritis; a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided dextrose 25% hypertonic prolotherapy and intra-articular normal saline injection on pain, functional limitation, and range of motion in patients with knee osteoarthritis; a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided dextrose 25% hypertonic prolotherapy and intra-articular normal saline injection on pain, functional limitation, and range of motion in patients with knee osteoarthritis; a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided dextrose 25% hypertonic prolotherapy and intra-articular normal saline injection on pain, functional limitation, and range of motion in patients with knee osteoarthritis; a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound guided dextrose 25 hypertonic prolotherapy and intra articular normal saline injection on pain functional limitation and range of motion in patients with knee osteoarthritis a randomized controlled trial
topic Osteoarthritis
Knee
Prolotherapy
Dextrose
Intra-articular normal saline injection
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08580-5
work_keys_str_mv AT alirezateymouri comparisonoftheefficacyofultrasoundguideddextrose25hypertonicprolotherapyandintraarticularnormalsalineinjectiononpainfunctionallimitationandrangeofmotioninpatientswithkneeosteoarthritisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nafisehbirang comparisonoftheefficacyofultrasoundguideddextrose25hypertonicprolotherapyandintraarticularnormalsalineinjectiononpainfunctionallimitationandrangeofmotioninpatientswithkneeosteoarthritisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maryamsadatfakheri comparisonoftheefficacyofultrasoundguideddextrose25hypertonicprolotherapyandintraarticularnormalsalineinjectiononpainfunctionallimitationandrangeofmotioninpatientswithkneeosteoarthritisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT arefnasiri comparisonoftheefficacyofultrasoundguideddextrose25hypertonicprolotherapyandintraarticularnormalsalineinjectiononpainfunctionallimitationandrangeofmotioninpatientswithkneeosteoarthritisarandomizedcontrolledtrial