Deep learning for Parkinson’s disease classification using multimodal and multi-sequences PET/MR images

Abstract Background We aimed to use deep learning (DL) techniques to accurately differentiate Parkinson’s disease (PD) from multiple system atrophy (MSA), which share similar clinical presentations. In this retrospective analysis, 206 patients who underwent PET/MR imaging at the Chinese PLA General...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yan Chang, Jiajin Liu, Shuwei Sun, Tong Chen, Ruimin Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-05-01
Series:EJNMMI Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-025-01245-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background We aimed to use deep learning (DL) techniques to accurately differentiate Parkinson’s disease (PD) from multiple system atrophy (MSA), which share similar clinical presentations. In this retrospective analysis, 206 patients who underwent PET/MR imaging at the Chinese PLA General Hospital were included, having been clinically diagnosed with either PD or MSA; an additional 38 healthy volunteers served as normal controls (NC). All subjects were randomly assigned to the training and test sets at a ratio of 7:3. The input to the model consists of 10 two-dimensional (2D) slices in axial, coronal, and sagittal planes from multi-modal images. A modified Residual Block Network with 18 layers (ResNet18) was trained with different modal images, to classify PD, MSA, and NC. A four-fold cross-validation method was applied in the training set. Performance evaluations included accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results Six single-modal models and seven multi-modal models were trained and tested. The PET models outperformed MRI models. The 11C-methyl-N-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-fluorophenyl)-tropanel (11C-CFT) -Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) model showed the best classification, which resulted in 0.97 accuracy, 0.93 precision, 0.95 recall, 0.92 F1, and 0.96 AUC. In the test set, the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score of the CFT-ADC model were 0.70, 0.73, 0.93, and 0.82, respectively. Conclusions The proposed DL method shows potential as a high-performance assisting tool for the accurate diagnosis of PD and MSA. A multi-modal and multi-sequence model could further enhance the ability to classify PD.
ISSN:2191-219X