Comparison of Battery Electrical Vehicles and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles–Greenhouse Gas Emission Life Cycle Assessment

Battery electrical vehicle (BEV) ownership has increased in recent years. There is a general concern over the life cycle of the batteries used in such vehicles. This study provides a comprehensive overview of electric vehicles, encompassing their technical evolution, autonomy, and ownership. The ana...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vasco Vieira, Andresa Baptista, Adélio Cavadas, Gustavo F. Pinto, Joaquim Monteiro, Leonardo Ribeiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-03-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/6/3122
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849342123701174272
author Vasco Vieira
Andresa Baptista
Adélio Cavadas
Gustavo F. Pinto
Joaquim Monteiro
Leonardo Ribeiro
author_facet Vasco Vieira
Andresa Baptista
Adélio Cavadas
Gustavo F. Pinto
Joaquim Monteiro
Leonardo Ribeiro
author_sort Vasco Vieira
collection DOAJ
description Battery electrical vehicle (BEV) ownership has increased in recent years. There is a general concern over the life cycle of the batteries used in such vehicles. This study provides a comprehensive overview of electric vehicles, encompassing their technical evolution, autonomy, and ownership. The analysis delved into the various types of batteries utilized in these vehicles, examining the composition of their constituent materials and the mechanisms underlying their operation. Additionally, it assessed their performance in terms of energy density storage, recharge capabilities, autonomy, and prospects. A critical evaluation of electric vehicles and their internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV) counterparts, considering the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) criterion, was conducted. The LCA criterion encompasses emissions during the entire lifecycle, from the “cradle” to the “tank” (WTT) and the “tank” until the end of its cycle (TTW). The findings of this study indicate that BEVs consistently outperformed ICEVs in terms of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in all the sizes of vehicles studied.
format Article
id doaj-art-177a8bbfbcbd449fba24916787220a4e
institution Kabale University
issn 2076-3417
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-177a8bbfbcbd449fba24916787220a4e2025-08-20T03:43:29ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172025-03-01156312210.3390/app15063122Comparison of Battery Electrical Vehicles and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles–Greenhouse Gas Emission Life Cycle AssessmentVasco Vieira0Andresa Baptista1Adélio Cavadas2Gustavo F. Pinto3Joaquim Monteiro4Leonardo Ribeiro5CIDEM, ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4249-015 Porto, PortugalCIDEM, ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4249-015 Porto, PortugalProMetheus—Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun’Álvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, PortugalCIDEM, ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4249-015 Porto, PortugalCIDEM, ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4249-015 Porto, PortugalCIDEM, ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4249-015 Porto, PortugalBattery electrical vehicle (BEV) ownership has increased in recent years. There is a general concern over the life cycle of the batteries used in such vehicles. This study provides a comprehensive overview of electric vehicles, encompassing their technical evolution, autonomy, and ownership. The analysis delved into the various types of batteries utilized in these vehicles, examining the composition of their constituent materials and the mechanisms underlying their operation. Additionally, it assessed their performance in terms of energy density storage, recharge capabilities, autonomy, and prospects. A critical evaluation of electric vehicles and their internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV) counterparts, considering the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) criterion, was conducted. The LCA criterion encompasses emissions during the entire lifecycle, from the “cradle” to the “tank” (WTT) and the “tank” until the end of its cycle (TTW). The findings of this study indicate that BEVs consistently outperformed ICEVs in terms of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in all the sizes of vehicles studied.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/6/3122battery electric vehicleinternal combustion engineGHG emissionsLCA
spellingShingle Vasco Vieira
Andresa Baptista
Adélio Cavadas
Gustavo F. Pinto
Joaquim Monteiro
Leonardo Ribeiro
Comparison of Battery Electrical Vehicles and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles–Greenhouse Gas Emission Life Cycle Assessment
Applied Sciences
battery electric vehicle
internal combustion engine
GHG emissions
LCA
title Comparison of Battery Electrical Vehicles and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles–Greenhouse Gas Emission Life Cycle Assessment
title_full Comparison of Battery Electrical Vehicles and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles–Greenhouse Gas Emission Life Cycle Assessment
title_fullStr Comparison of Battery Electrical Vehicles and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles–Greenhouse Gas Emission Life Cycle Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Battery Electrical Vehicles and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles–Greenhouse Gas Emission Life Cycle Assessment
title_short Comparison of Battery Electrical Vehicles and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles–Greenhouse Gas Emission Life Cycle Assessment
title_sort comparison of battery electrical vehicles and internal combustion engine vehicles greenhouse gas emission life cycle assessment
topic battery electric vehicle
internal combustion engine
GHG emissions
LCA
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/6/3122
work_keys_str_mv AT vascovieira comparisonofbatteryelectricalvehiclesandinternalcombustionenginevehiclesgreenhousegasemissionlifecycleassessment
AT andresabaptista comparisonofbatteryelectricalvehiclesandinternalcombustionenginevehiclesgreenhousegasemissionlifecycleassessment
AT adeliocavadas comparisonofbatteryelectricalvehiclesandinternalcombustionenginevehiclesgreenhousegasemissionlifecycleassessment
AT gustavofpinto comparisonofbatteryelectricalvehiclesandinternalcombustionenginevehiclesgreenhousegasemissionlifecycleassessment
AT joaquimmonteiro comparisonofbatteryelectricalvehiclesandinternalcombustionenginevehiclesgreenhousegasemissionlifecycleassessment
AT leonardoribeiro comparisonofbatteryelectricalvehiclesandinternalcombustionenginevehiclesgreenhousegasemissionlifecycleassessment