СРАВНЕНИЕ ВЛИЯНИЯ ДЛИТЕЛЬНОЙ ТЕРАПИИ, ОСНОВАННОЙ НА КАРВЕДИЛОЛЕ И БИСОПРОЛОЛЕ, НА МЕТАБОЛИЧЕСКИЕ ПАРАМЕТРЫ И ЭРЕКТИЛЬНУЮ ФУНКЦИЮ У БОЛЬНЫХ АРТЕРИАЛЬНОЙ ГИПЕРТОНИЕЙ И ИЗБЫТОЧНОЙ МАССОЙ ТЕЛА ИЛИ ОЖИРЕНИЕМ: РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ РАНДОМИЗИРОВАННОГО, ОТКРЫТОГО, ПАРАЛЛЕЛЬ

Aim — to compare the antihypertensive efficacy, effect on blood glucose, uric acid, index of insulin resistance levels, lipid profile and effect on erectile function of long-term therapy, based on carvedilol and bisoprolol in patients with AH 1−2 deg. and overweight/obesity.Materials and methods. Ty...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Y. Martsevich, S. N. Tolpygina
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: ABV-press 2014-07-01
Series:Klinicist
Subjects:
Online Access:https://klinitsist.abvpress.ru/Klin/article/view/64
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849340579918381056
author S. Y. Martsevich
S. N. Tolpygina
author_facet S. Y. Martsevich
S. N. Tolpygina
author_sort S. Y. Martsevich
collection DOAJ
description Aim — to compare the antihypertensive efficacy, effect on blood glucose, uric acid, index of insulin resistance levels, lipid profile and effect on erectile function of long-term therapy, based on carvedilol and bisoprolol in patients with AH 1−2 deg. and overweight/obesity.Materials and methods. Type of research: clinical, multicenter, randomized, open, comparative, stepped, in two parallel groups. The study included 105 patients (53 in Carvedilol gr. and 52 in Bisoprolol gr. ). 98 patients completed the 24-week course of treatment of (48 in Carvedilol gr. and 50 in Bisoprolol gr.). Average duration of the study for each patient was 23 weeks. We took into account demographic, clinicaland anamnestic data, physical examination on all visits. ECG, biochemical analysis, questionnaire IIEF (International Index of ErectileFunction) was performed initially and at 12 and 24 weeks of therapy. After randomization, patients began to receive 12.5 mg of carvedilol twice or 5 mg bisoprolol once daily. BAB dose titration was allowed, as well as sequential addition of amlodipine and/or indapamideto achieve target BP levels.Results. Both groups of patients were comparable in terms of basic clinical and demographic characteristics of the studied parametersat baseline. Age of patients ranged from 20 to 78 years. Analysis of the blood pressure dynamics during treatment showed no significant differences in the hypotensive effect of treatment (gr. 1 ΔAP V0‑6 = −29.5 ± 11.3/17.8 ± 8.4 and gr. 2 ΔAP V0‑6 = −30.4 ± 12.8/18.7 ± 8 mm Hg; p < 0.001 for both groups) and the need for the appointment of additional drugs. All patients who completed study reached target blood pressure. In both groups for 6 months of therapy, a statistically significant decrease in weight (−1.76 ± 3.3 — gr. 1 and −1.66 ± 2.5 kg — gr. 2; p < 0.001 for both groups) and BMI (−0.57 ± 1.1 — gr. 1, p = 0.001 and −0.53 ± 0.8 kg/m2 — gr. 2, p < 0.001), WC (−1.8 ± 3.2 — gr. 1, p < 0.01 and −1.4 ± 2.8 kg/m2 — gr. 2, p < 0.05) and thighs (differences between-groups were not significant). In carvedilol g. there was a significant decrease in glucose level (−0.45 ± 1.2 mmol/l; p = 0.01), uric acid (−0.05 ± 0.01 mmol/l; p < 0.001) and LDL(−0.28 ± 0.9 mmol/l; p < 0.05), as well as the downward trend in HOMA index. In bisoprolol group there was an increase of blood creatininelevel (6.35 ± 22.4 mg/dL; p = 0.05) and there was no dynamic metabolic parameters. GFR in carvedilol gr. didn’t not significantlychanged, and in bisoprolol gr. significantly decreased from 12 to 24 weeks of therapy (−3.8 ± 15.2 ml/min/1.73 m2; pV5‑6 = 0.01). Analysisof EF showed improvement in EF in carvedilol gr. as compared with baseline and with a level of 12 weeks of therapy (Δ2.4 ± 5.0; p = 0.002for general and Δ0.67 ± 2.3; p < 0.05 for EF 1−5.15). The group also observed the deterioration of the erectile function in bisoprolol gr. bythe period from 12 to 24 weeks of therapy (−1.8 ± 7.9; p < 0.1 for total and −0.73 ± 2.7; p < 0.05 for EF 1−5.15). There were no differencesin frequency and severity of adverse events between groups.Conclusions. Though antihypertensive efficacy was equal, carvedilol, in contrast to bisoprolol, had not only beneficial metabolic effects, but in case of chronic administration was able to improve erectile function in patients with hypertension and abdominal obesity.
format Article
id doaj-art-176567ce461441748fa0ada64e360d0c
institution Kabale University
issn 1818-8338
language Russian
publishDate 2014-07-01
publisher ABV-press
record_format Article
series Klinicist
spelling doaj-art-176567ce461441748fa0ada64e360d0c2025-08-20T03:43:52ZrusABV-pressKlinicist1818-83382014-07-0161152510.17650/1818-8338-2012-1-15-2579СРАВНЕНИЕ ВЛИЯНИЯ ДЛИТЕЛЬНОЙ ТЕРАПИИ, ОСНОВАННОЙ НА КАРВЕДИЛОЛЕ И БИСОПРОЛОЛЕ, НА МЕТАБОЛИЧЕСКИЕ ПАРАМЕТРЫ И ЭРЕКТИЛЬНУЮ ФУНКЦИЮ У БОЛЬНЫХ АРТЕРИАЛЬНОЙ ГИПЕРТОНИЕЙ И ИЗБЫТОЧНОЙ МАССОЙ ТЕЛА ИЛИ ОЖИРЕНИЕМ: РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ РАНДОМИЗИРОВАННОГО, ОТКРЫТОГО, ПАРАЛЛЕЛЬS. Y. Martsevich0S. N. Tolpygina1State Research Center of Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Health and Social Development of RussiaState Research Center of Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Health and Social Development of RussiaAim — to compare the antihypertensive efficacy, effect on blood glucose, uric acid, index of insulin resistance levels, lipid profile and effect on erectile function of long-term therapy, based on carvedilol and bisoprolol in patients with AH 1−2 deg. and overweight/obesity.Materials and methods. Type of research: clinical, multicenter, randomized, open, comparative, stepped, in two parallel groups. The study included 105 patients (53 in Carvedilol gr. and 52 in Bisoprolol gr. ). 98 patients completed the 24-week course of treatment of (48 in Carvedilol gr. and 50 in Bisoprolol gr.). Average duration of the study for each patient was 23 weeks. We took into account demographic, clinicaland anamnestic data, physical examination on all visits. ECG, biochemical analysis, questionnaire IIEF (International Index of ErectileFunction) was performed initially and at 12 and 24 weeks of therapy. After randomization, patients began to receive 12.5 mg of carvedilol twice or 5 mg bisoprolol once daily. BAB dose titration was allowed, as well as sequential addition of amlodipine and/or indapamideto achieve target BP levels.Results. Both groups of patients were comparable in terms of basic clinical and demographic characteristics of the studied parametersat baseline. Age of patients ranged from 20 to 78 years. Analysis of the blood pressure dynamics during treatment showed no significant differences in the hypotensive effect of treatment (gr. 1 ΔAP V0‑6 = −29.5 ± 11.3/17.8 ± 8.4 and gr. 2 ΔAP V0‑6 = −30.4 ± 12.8/18.7 ± 8 mm Hg; p < 0.001 for both groups) and the need for the appointment of additional drugs. All patients who completed study reached target blood pressure. In both groups for 6 months of therapy, a statistically significant decrease in weight (−1.76 ± 3.3 — gr. 1 and −1.66 ± 2.5 kg — gr. 2; p < 0.001 for both groups) and BMI (−0.57 ± 1.1 — gr. 1, p = 0.001 and −0.53 ± 0.8 kg/m2 — gr. 2, p < 0.001), WC (−1.8 ± 3.2 — gr. 1, p < 0.01 and −1.4 ± 2.8 kg/m2 — gr. 2, p < 0.05) and thighs (differences between-groups were not significant). In carvedilol g. there was a significant decrease in glucose level (−0.45 ± 1.2 mmol/l; p = 0.01), uric acid (−0.05 ± 0.01 mmol/l; p < 0.001) and LDL(−0.28 ± 0.9 mmol/l; p < 0.05), as well as the downward trend in HOMA index. In bisoprolol group there was an increase of blood creatininelevel (6.35 ± 22.4 mg/dL; p = 0.05) and there was no dynamic metabolic parameters. GFR in carvedilol gr. didn’t not significantlychanged, and in bisoprolol gr. significantly decreased from 12 to 24 weeks of therapy (−3.8 ± 15.2 ml/min/1.73 m2; pV5‑6 = 0.01). Analysisof EF showed improvement in EF in carvedilol gr. as compared with baseline and with a level of 12 weeks of therapy (Δ2.4 ± 5.0; p = 0.002for general and Δ0.67 ± 2.3; p < 0.05 for EF 1−5.15). The group also observed the deterioration of the erectile function in bisoprolol gr. bythe period from 12 to 24 weeks of therapy (−1.8 ± 7.9; p < 0.1 for total and −0.73 ± 2.7; p < 0.05 for EF 1−5.15). There were no differencesin frequency and severity of adverse events between groups.Conclusions. Though antihypertensive efficacy was equal, carvedilol, in contrast to bisoprolol, had not only beneficial metabolic effects, but in case of chronic administration was able to improve erectile function in patients with hypertension and abdominal obesity.https://klinitsist.abvpress.ru/Klin/article/view/64hypertensionoverweightobesitymetabolic effectserectile functionbeta-blockerscarvedilolbisoprolol
spellingShingle S. Y. Martsevich
S. N. Tolpygina
СРАВНЕНИЕ ВЛИЯНИЯ ДЛИТЕЛЬНОЙ ТЕРАПИИ, ОСНОВАННОЙ НА КАРВЕДИЛОЛЕ И БИСОПРОЛОЛЕ, НА МЕТАБОЛИЧЕСКИЕ ПАРАМЕТРЫ И ЭРЕКТИЛЬНУЮ ФУНКЦИЮ У БОЛЬНЫХ АРТЕРИАЛЬНОЙ ГИПЕРТОНИЕЙ И ИЗБЫТОЧНОЙ МАССОЙ ТЕЛА ИЛИ ОЖИРЕНИЕМ: РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ РАНДОМИЗИРОВАННОГО, ОТКРЫТОГО, ПАРАЛЛЕЛЬ
Klinicist
hypertension
overweight
obesity
metabolic effects
erectile function
beta-blockers
carvedilol
bisoprolol
title СРАВНЕНИЕ ВЛИЯНИЯ ДЛИТЕЛЬНОЙ ТЕРАПИИ, ОСНОВАННОЙ НА КАРВЕДИЛОЛЕ И БИСОПРОЛОЛЕ, НА МЕТАБОЛИЧЕСКИЕ ПАРАМЕТРЫ И ЭРЕКТИЛЬНУЮ ФУНКЦИЮ У БОЛЬНЫХ АРТЕРИАЛЬНОЙ ГИПЕРТОНИЕЙ И ИЗБЫТОЧНОЙ МАССОЙ ТЕЛА ИЛИ ОЖИРЕНИЕМ: РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ РАНДОМИЗИРОВАННОГО, ОТКРЫТОГО, ПАРАЛЛЕЛЬ
title_full СРАВНЕНИЕ ВЛИЯНИЯ ДЛИТЕЛЬНОЙ ТЕРАПИИ, ОСНОВАННОЙ НА КАРВЕДИЛОЛЕ И БИСОПРОЛОЛЕ, НА МЕТАБОЛИЧЕСКИЕ ПАРАМЕТРЫ И ЭРЕКТИЛЬНУЮ ФУНКЦИЮ У БОЛЬНЫХ АРТЕРИАЛЬНОЙ ГИПЕРТОНИЕЙ И ИЗБЫТОЧНОЙ МАССОЙ ТЕЛА ИЛИ ОЖИРЕНИЕМ: РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ РАНДОМИЗИРОВАННОГО, ОТКРЫТОГО, ПАРАЛЛЕЛЬ
title_fullStr СРАВНЕНИЕ ВЛИЯНИЯ ДЛИТЕЛЬНОЙ ТЕРАПИИ, ОСНОВАННОЙ НА КАРВЕДИЛОЛЕ И БИСОПРОЛОЛЕ, НА МЕТАБОЛИЧЕСКИЕ ПАРАМЕТРЫ И ЭРЕКТИЛЬНУЮ ФУНКЦИЮ У БОЛЬНЫХ АРТЕРИАЛЬНОЙ ГИПЕРТОНИЕЙ И ИЗБЫТОЧНОЙ МАССОЙ ТЕЛА ИЛИ ОЖИРЕНИЕМ: РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ РАНДОМИЗИРОВАННОГО, ОТКРЫТОГО, ПАРАЛЛЕЛЬ
title_full_unstemmed СРАВНЕНИЕ ВЛИЯНИЯ ДЛИТЕЛЬНОЙ ТЕРАПИИ, ОСНОВАННОЙ НА КАРВЕДИЛОЛЕ И БИСОПРОЛОЛЕ, НА МЕТАБОЛИЧЕСКИЕ ПАРАМЕТРЫ И ЭРЕКТИЛЬНУЮ ФУНКЦИЮ У БОЛЬНЫХ АРТЕРИАЛЬНОЙ ГИПЕРТОНИЕЙ И ИЗБЫТОЧНОЙ МАССОЙ ТЕЛА ИЛИ ОЖИРЕНИЕМ: РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ РАНДОМИЗИРОВАННОГО, ОТКРЫТОГО, ПАРАЛЛЕЛЬ
title_short СРАВНЕНИЕ ВЛИЯНИЯ ДЛИТЕЛЬНОЙ ТЕРАПИИ, ОСНОВАННОЙ НА КАРВЕДИЛОЛЕ И БИСОПРОЛОЛЕ, НА МЕТАБОЛИЧЕСКИЕ ПАРАМЕТРЫ И ЭРЕКТИЛЬНУЮ ФУНКЦИЮ У БОЛЬНЫХ АРТЕРИАЛЬНОЙ ГИПЕРТОНИЕЙ И ИЗБЫТОЧНОЙ МАССОЙ ТЕЛА ИЛИ ОЖИРЕНИЕМ: РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ РАНДОМИЗИРОВАННОГО, ОТКРЫТОГО, ПАРАЛЛЕЛЬ
title_sort сравнение влияния длительной терапии основанной на карведилоле и бисопрололе на метаболические параметры и эректильную функцию у больных артериальной гипертонией и избыточной массой тела или ожирением результаты рандомизированного открытого параллель
topic hypertension
overweight
obesity
metabolic effects
erectile function
beta-blockers
carvedilol
bisoprolol
url https://klinitsist.abvpress.ru/Klin/article/view/64
work_keys_str_mv AT symartsevich sravnenievliâniâdlitelʹnojterapiiosnovannojnakarvediloleibisoprololenametaboličeskieparametryiérektilʹnuûfunkciûubolʹnyharterialʹnojgipertoniejiizbytočnojmassojtelailiožireniemrezulʹtatyrandomizirovannogootkrytogoparallelʹ
AT sntolpygina sravnenievliâniâdlitelʹnojterapiiosnovannojnakarvediloleibisoprololenametaboličeskieparametryiérektilʹnuûfunkciûubolʹnyharterialʹnojgipertoniejiizbytočnojmassojtelailiožireniemrezulʹtatyrandomizirovannogootkrytogoparallelʹ