A Participatory Evaluation of Transforming First Year LLB Into Block Mode
This paper adopts a participatory evaluation approach to identify successes and challenges experienced by a group of academics in redesigning and delivering the first year of the Law degree (LLB) in block mode in an Australian university. This transformation into an intensive four-week block necessi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bond University
2021-04-01
|
| Series: | Legal Education Review |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.22297 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850112990896979968 |
|---|---|
| author | Gayani Samarawickrema Tristan Galloway Kathleen Raponi Gerard Everett |
| author_facet | Gayani Samarawickrema Tristan Galloway Kathleen Raponi Gerard Everett |
| author_sort | Gayani Samarawickrema |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper adopts a participatory evaluation approach to identify successes and challenges experienced by a group of academics in redesigning and delivering the first year of the Law degree (LLB) in block mode in an Australian university. This transformation into an intensive four-week block necessitated an overhaul of curricula, assessment regimes, teaching practices and delivery processes. The evaluation of the academics staff experience focused on five themes: (1) course design and development, (2) satisfying learning outcomes and accreditation standards, (3) implementing student engagement strategies, (4) embedding block mode principles, and (5) establishing effective assessment regimes. For each theme, participants identified the successes, challenges, and lessons learned. The study highlighted the value of early design-specialist involvement and collaboration in course design including the importance of being aware of the legal accreditation body requirements. The criticality of focused active learning and the need to balance lecture-style delivery with knowledge-consolidating practical legal analysis exercises was emphasised. Also stressed was wellbeing, including sensitivity to individual student circumstances and strategies that successfully manage staff and student workloads alongside academic integrity. Unintended benefits such as professional learning through the collaboration, refining personal thinking related to pedagogy in the block were consequences of this evaluative approach. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1726fcedefb14a6ab3bb2b06eb087f9f |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1033-2839 1839-3713 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
| publisher | Bond University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Legal Education Review |
| spelling | doaj-art-1726fcedefb14a6ab3bb2b06eb087f9f2025-08-20T02:37:16ZengBond UniversityLegal Education Review1033-28391839-37132021-04-0130110.53300/001c.22297A Participatory Evaluation of Transforming First Year LLB Into Block ModeGayani SamarawickremaTristan GallowayKathleen RaponiGerard EverettThis paper adopts a participatory evaluation approach to identify successes and challenges experienced by a group of academics in redesigning and delivering the first year of the Law degree (LLB) in block mode in an Australian university. This transformation into an intensive four-week block necessitated an overhaul of curricula, assessment regimes, teaching practices and delivery processes. The evaluation of the academics staff experience focused on five themes: (1) course design and development, (2) satisfying learning outcomes and accreditation standards, (3) implementing student engagement strategies, (4) embedding block mode principles, and (5) establishing effective assessment regimes. For each theme, participants identified the successes, challenges, and lessons learned. The study highlighted the value of early design-specialist involvement and collaboration in course design including the importance of being aware of the legal accreditation body requirements. The criticality of focused active learning and the need to balance lecture-style delivery with knowledge-consolidating practical legal analysis exercises was emphasised. Also stressed was wellbeing, including sensitivity to individual student circumstances and strategies that successfully manage staff and student workloads alongside academic integrity. Unintended benefits such as professional learning through the collaboration, refining personal thinking related to pedagogy in the block were consequences of this evaluative approach.https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.22297 |
| spellingShingle | Gayani Samarawickrema Tristan Galloway Kathleen Raponi Gerard Everett A Participatory Evaluation of Transforming First Year LLB Into Block Mode Legal Education Review |
| title | A Participatory Evaluation of Transforming First Year LLB Into Block Mode |
| title_full | A Participatory Evaluation of Transforming First Year LLB Into Block Mode |
| title_fullStr | A Participatory Evaluation of Transforming First Year LLB Into Block Mode |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Participatory Evaluation of Transforming First Year LLB Into Block Mode |
| title_short | A Participatory Evaluation of Transforming First Year LLB Into Block Mode |
| title_sort | participatory evaluation of transforming first year llb into block mode |
| url | https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.22297 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gayanisamarawickrema aparticipatoryevaluationoftransformingfirstyearllbintoblockmode AT tristangalloway aparticipatoryevaluationoftransformingfirstyearllbintoblockmode AT kathleenraponi aparticipatoryevaluationoftransformingfirstyearllbintoblockmode AT gerardeverett aparticipatoryevaluationoftransformingfirstyearllbintoblockmode AT gayanisamarawickrema participatoryevaluationoftransformingfirstyearllbintoblockmode AT tristangalloway participatoryevaluationoftransformingfirstyearllbintoblockmode AT kathleenraponi participatoryevaluationoftransformingfirstyearllbintoblockmode AT gerardeverett participatoryevaluationoftransformingfirstyearllbintoblockmode |