Sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews. Critical review and recommendations
<p>Integrating sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews is essential to understand the influence of sex and gender on health outcomes. Although historically underestimated, these variables are vital in clinical research to consolidate evidence in health, technological assessments and public p...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
Centro Provincial de Información de Ciencias Médicas. Cienfuegos
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Medisur |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://medisur.sld.cu/index.php/medisur/article/view/45294 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832576809014657024 |
|---|---|
| author | Raúl Aguilera Eguía Olga Patricia López Soto Ángel Roco Videla Brenda Herrera Serna Héctor Fuentes Barria Lorena Gerli Candia |
| author_facet | Raúl Aguilera Eguía Olga Patricia López Soto Ángel Roco Videla Brenda Herrera Serna Héctor Fuentes Barria Lorena Gerli Candia |
| author_sort | Raúl Aguilera Eguía |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Integrating sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews is essential to understand the influence of sex and gender on health outcomes. Although historically underestimated, these variables are vital in clinical research to consolidate evidence in health, technological assessments and public policies. This study aims to explore in depth the importance and challenges of incorporating sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews, with emphasis on the benefits it brings and recommendations for future research. Sex/gender analysis allows for the detection of subtle differences in therapeutic effects, thereby enriching clinical practice and promoting the design of personalized therapies. However, its proper incorporation faces challenges, such as confusion between “sex” and “gender” and the lack of contextualized data. Despite these obstacles, it is essential to adopt and standardize it, in order to guarantee accurate assessments and reliable results, as well as to promote more equitable and patient-oriented medicine.</p> |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-171d390770704459a73f38fda96a251b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1727-897X |
| language | Spanish |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Centro Provincial de Información de Ciencias Médicas. Cienfuegos |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Medisur |
| spelling | doaj-art-171d390770704459a73f38fda96a251b2025-01-30T21:29:04ZspaCentro Provincial de Información de Ciencias Médicas. CienfuegosMedisur1727-897X2025-01-01230e45294e452942613Sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews. Critical review and recommendationsRaúl Aguilera Eguía0Olga Patricia López Soto1Ángel Roco Videla2Brenda Herrera Serna3Héctor Fuentes Barria4Lorena Gerli Candia5Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción. ConcepciónUniversidad Autónoma de Manizales. ManizalesUniversidad Bernardo O´Higgins. Santiago ChileUniversidad Autónoma de Manizales. ManizalesUniversidad Arturo Prat. IquiqueUniversidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción. Concepción<p>Integrating sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews is essential to understand the influence of sex and gender on health outcomes. Although historically underestimated, these variables are vital in clinical research to consolidate evidence in health, technological assessments and public policies. This study aims to explore in depth the importance and challenges of incorporating sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews, with emphasis on the benefits it brings and recommendations for future research. Sex/gender analysis allows for the detection of subtle differences in therapeutic effects, thereby enriching clinical practice and promoting the design of personalized therapies. However, its proper incorporation faces challenges, such as confusion between “sex” and “gender” and the lack of contextualized data. Despite these obstacles, it is essential to adopt and standardize it, in order to guarantee accurate assessments and reliable results, as well as to promote more equitable and patient-oriented medicine.</p>http://medisur.sld.cu/index.php/medisur/article/view/45294análisis de género en saludrevisiones sistemáticas como asuntoequidad en saludpolíticas de salud pública |
| spellingShingle | Raúl Aguilera Eguía Olga Patricia López Soto Ángel Roco Videla Brenda Herrera Serna Héctor Fuentes Barria Lorena Gerli Candia Sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews. Critical review and recommendations Medisur análisis de género en salud revisiones sistemáticas como asunto equidad en salud políticas de salud pública |
| title | Sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews. Critical review and recommendations |
| title_full | Sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews. Critical review and recommendations |
| title_fullStr | Sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews. Critical review and recommendations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews. Critical review and recommendations |
| title_short | Sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews. Critical review and recommendations |
| title_sort | sex gender analysis in systematic reviews critical review and recommendations |
| topic | análisis de género en salud revisiones sistemáticas como asunto equidad en salud políticas de salud pública |
| url | http://medisur.sld.cu/index.php/medisur/article/view/45294 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT raulaguileraeguia sexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewscriticalreviewandrecommendations AT olgapatricialopezsoto sexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewscriticalreviewandrecommendations AT angelrocovidela sexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewscriticalreviewandrecommendations AT brendaherreraserna sexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewscriticalreviewandrecommendations AT hectorfuentesbarria sexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewscriticalreviewandrecommendations AT lorenagerlicandia sexgenderanalysisinsystematicreviewscriticalreviewandrecommendations |