Effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns

Objectives The present study investigated the effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns in relation to their compressive strength. Materials and methods Four different cements were tested: zinc phosphate cement (ZPC), glass-ionomer cement (GIC), self-adhesive resin-based...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keisuke Nakamura, Mathieu Mouhat, John Magnus Nergård, Solveig Jenssen Lægreid, Taro Kanno, Percy Milleding, Ulf Örtengren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medical Journals Sweden 2016-12-01
Series:Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/23337931.2015.1129908
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846094611202703360
author Keisuke Nakamura
Mathieu Mouhat
John Magnus Nergård
Solveig Jenssen Lægreid
Taro Kanno
Percy Milleding
Ulf Örtengren
author_facet Keisuke Nakamura
Mathieu Mouhat
John Magnus Nergård
Solveig Jenssen Lægreid
Taro Kanno
Percy Milleding
Ulf Örtengren
author_sort Keisuke Nakamura
collection DOAJ
description Objectives The present study investigated the effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns in relation to their compressive strength. Materials and methods Four different cements were tested: zinc phosphate cement (ZPC), glass-ionomer cement (GIC), self-adhesive resin-based cement (SRC) and resin-based cement (RC). RC was used in both dual cure mode (RC-D) and chemical cure mode (RC-C). First, the compressive strength of each cement was tested according to a standard (ISO 9917-1:2004). Second, load-to-failure test was performed to analyze the crown fracture resistance. CAD/CAM-produced monolithic zirconia crowns with a minimal thickness of 0.5 mm were prepared and cemented to dies with each cement. The crown–die samples were loaded until fracture. Results The compressive strength of SRC, RC-D and RC-C was significantly higher than those of ZPC and GIC (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the fracture load of the crown between the groups. Conclusion The values achieved in the load-to-failure test suggest that monolithic zirconia crowns with a minimal thickness of 0.5 mm may have good resistance against fracture regardless of types of cements.
format Article
id doaj-art-16df64ff30f14bb08bd1c973d08af724
institution Kabale University
issn 2333-7931
language English
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Medical Journals Sweden
record_format Article
series Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica
spelling doaj-art-16df64ff30f14bb08bd1c973d08af7242025-01-02T12:58:41ZengMedical Journals SwedenActa Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica2333-79312016-12-0121121910.3109/23337931.2015.11299081129908Effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crownsKeisuke Nakamura0Mathieu Mouhat1John Magnus Nergård2Solveig Jenssen Lægreid3Taro Kanno4Percy Milleding5Ulf Örtengren6Institute of Odontology, University of Gothenburgthe Arctic University of Norwaythe Arctic University of Norwaythe Arctic University of NorwayTohoku University Graduate School of DentistryInstitute of Odontology, University of GothenburgInstitute of Odontology, University of GothenburgObjectives The present study investigated the effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns in relation to their compressive strength. Materials and methods Four different cements were tested: zinc phosphate cement (ZPC), glass-ionomer cement (GIC), self-adhesive resin-based cement (SRC) and resin-based cement (RC). RC was used in both dual cure mode (RC-D) and chemical cure mode (RC-C). First, the compressive strength of each cement was tested according to a standard (ISO 9917-1:2004). Second, load-to-failure test was performed to analyze the crown fracture resistance. CAD/CAM-produced monolithic zirconia crowns with a minimal thickness of 0.5 mm were prepared and cemented to dies with each cement. The crown–die samples were loaded until fracture. Results The compressive strength of SRC, RC-D and RC-C was significantly higher than those of ZPC and GIC (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the fracture load of the crown between the groups. Conclusion The values achieved in the load-to-failure test suggest that monolithic zirconia crowns with a minimal thickness of 0.5 mm may have good resistance against fracture regardless of types of cements.http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/23337931.2015.1129908Monolithic zirconia crownsfracture resistancezinc phosphate cementglass-ionomer cementresin-based cement
spellingShingle Keisuke Nakamura
Mathieu Mouhat
John Magnus Nergård
Solveig Jenssen Lægreid
Taro Kanno
Percy Milleding
Ulf Örtengren
Effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns
Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica
Monolithic zirconia crowns
fracture resistance
zinc phosphate cement
glass-ionomer cement
resin-based cement
title Effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns
title_full Effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns
title_fullStr Effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns
title_full_unstemmed Effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns
title_short Effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns
title_sort effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns
topic Monolithic zirconia crowns
fracture resistance
zinc phosphate cement
glass-ionomer cement
resin-based cement
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/23337931.2015.1129908
work_keys_str_mv AT keisukenakamura effectofcementsonfractureresistanceofmonolithiczirconiacrowns
AT mathieumouhat effectofcementsonfractureresistanceofmonolithiczirconiacrowns
AT johnmagnusnergard effectofcementsonfractureresistanceofmonolithiczirconiacrowns
AT solveigjenssenlægreid effectofcementsonfractureresistanceofmonolithiczirconiacrowns
AT tarokanno effectofcementsonfractureresistanceofmonolithiczirconiacrowns
AT percymilleding effectofcementsonfractureresistanceofmonolithiczirconiacrowns
AT ulfortengren effectofcementsonfractureresistanceofmonolithiczirconiacrowns