How do migrants living with HIV adhere to the HIV care process in high-income countries? A systematic review

Background In high-income countries (HICs), migrants living with HIV (MLHIV) are more likely than other HIV subpopulations to encounter problems which hamper their adherence to the care process; these include social and administrative insecurity, discrimination and psychological distress.Objective T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heloïse Delagreverie, Rémi Gagnayre, Nicolas Vignier, Olivier Bouchaud, Jeanne Goupil de Bouillé, Clément Pascal, Baptiste Voyer, Jérémy Zeggagh, Yousra Kherabi, Vincent de Andrade, Lou Macaux
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2025-05-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/5/e093620.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background In high-income countries (HICs), migrants living with HIV (MLHIV) are more likely than other HIV subpopulations to encounter problems which hamper their adherence to the care process; these include social and administrative insecurity, discrimination and psychological distress.Objective This systematic review aimed to determine the specific features of adherence to the HIV care process among MLHIV in HIC.Method Three researchers independently selected studies from a search for papers focusing on empirical studies on MLHIV’s adherence to the care process in HIC, published between 1 January 2010 and 1 November 2024 in the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Google Scholar. The three dimensions evaluated for adherence to the care process were adherence to treatment, retention in care and virological response. HICs were characterised according to the World Bank’s definition.Results Of 601 studies screened, 69 were included (26 (38%) analysing treatment adherence 44 (64%) 44 (64%) retention in care and 34 (48%) virological response). In 49 (71%) of these studies, MLHIV from sub-Saharan Africa accounted for the majority of persons included. MLHIV were mainly categorised according to their geographical region of origin. Only one study considered the reasons for migration. Of 52 statistically significant associations, only five found that being a migrant (vs being a non-migrant) was associated with a better HIV care process. Moreover, several individual (sociodemographic, clinical and psychological), and structural (care system organisation and political) factors associated with difficulties in adhering to the HIV care process were identified.Discussion MLHIV living in HIC had poorer adherence to the HIV care process for all three dimensions studied (ie, treatment adherence, retention in care and virological response). Research studies categorise MLHIV according to their geographical origin. However, this type of categorisation does not adequately capture social inequalities in health. To overcome this, studies must instead categorise MLHIV according to various intersecting factors, including, among other things, their reason for migrating, the length of time living in the destination country and violence experienced during their migratory journey.PROSPERO registration number CRD42021253280.
ISSN:2044-6055