The association of meatal stenosis and infant circumcision

Background. The association of meatal stenosis with age at circumcision is controversial. We noticed a high rate of meatal stenosis in a region where early circumcision is traditional. The aim of this study is to compare the age at circumcision between boys with or without meatal stenosis....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sibel Tiryaki, Yaşar Issi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hacettepe University Institute of Child Health 2023-08-01
Series:The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://turkjpediatr.org/article/view/73
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850042105522552832
author Sibel Tiryaki
Yaşar Issi
author_facet Sibel Tiryaki
Yaşar Issi
author_sort Sibel Tiryaki
collection DOAJ
description Background. The association of meatal stenosis with age at circumcision is controversial. We noticed a high rate of meatal stenosis in a region where early circumcision is traditional. The aim of this study is to compare the age at circumcision between boys with or without meatal stenosis. Methods. After ethical approval, families of children with meatal stenosis were questioned about age at circumcision and reason for circumcision. Control group consisted of patients with diagnoses other than penile abnormalities, a normal urethral meatus, and having no symptoms about urination. Patients with a history of therapeutic circumcision were excluded from the study. Results. Between November 2016 and November 2020, 115 patients with meatal stenosis were admitted. All were corrected with ventral meatotomy under general anesthesia. Median age at circumcision was 3 (min:0-max:111) monthsand age at admission was 74 (min:22-max:194) months. Control group consisted of 205 boys. Median age at circumcision was 5 (min:0-max:122) months and age at admission was 96 (13-202) months. There was a statistically significant difference between groups in terms of age at circumcision (p=0.024) but none for age at admission (p=0.356). There was a twofold increase in the meatal stenosis rate (39% vs. 23%) if circumcision was performed before age one (p=0.018). There was no difference between the patients circumcised in the newborn period and later (38% vs 36%, p=0.778). Conclusions. Our study supports the previous reports suggesting a relation of risk for meatal stenosis and age at circumcision and presents data that age one might be a cutoff for this risk.
format Article
id doaj-art-167e34fc06cd475982470c62546d2de2
institution DOAJ
issn 0041-4301
2791-6421
language English
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Hacettepe University Institute of Child Health
record_format Article
series The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics
spelling doaj-art-167e34fc06cd475982470c62546d2de22025-08-20T02:55:38ZengHacettepe University Institute of Child HealthThe Turkish Journal of Pediatrics0041-43012791-64212023-08-0165410.24953/turkjped.2023.46The association of meatal stenosis and infant circumcisionSibel Tiryaki0Yaşar Issi1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir.Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, Bakırçay University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye. Background. The association of meatal stenosis with age at circumcision is controversial. We noticed a high rate of meatal stenosis in a region where early circumcision is traditional. The aim of this study is to compare the age at circumcision between boys with or without meatal stenosis. Methods. After ethical approval, families of children with meatal stenosis were questioned about age at circumcision and reason for circumcision. Control group consisted of patients with diagnoses other than penile abnormalities, a normal urethral meatus, and having no symptoms about urination. Patients with a history of therapeutic circumcision were excluded from the study. Results. Between November 2016 and November 2020, 115 patients with meatal stenosis were admitted. All were corrected with ventral meatotomy under general anesthesia. Median age at circumcision was 3 (min:0-max:111) monthsand age at admission was 74 (min:22-max:194) months. Control group consisted of 205 boys. Median age at circumcision was 5 (min:0-max:122) months and age at admission was 96 (13-202) months. There was a statistically significant difference between groups in terms of age at circumcision (p=0.024) but none for age at admission (p=0.356). There was a twofold increase in the meatal stenosis rate (39% vs. 23%) if circumcision was performed before age one (p=0.018). There was no difference between the patients circumcised in the newborn period and later (38% vs 36%, p=0.778). Conclusions. Our study supports the previous reports suggesting a relation of risk for meatal stenosis and age at circumcision and presents data that age one might be a cutoff for this risk. https://turkjpediatr.org/article/view/73circumcisioninfantmeatal stenosismeatal webneonatal
spellingShingle Sibel Tiryaki
Yaşar Issi
The association of meatal stenosis and infant circumcision
The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics
circumcision
infant
meatal stenosis
meatal web
neonatal
title The association of meatal stenosis and infant circumcision
title_full The association of meatal stenosis and infant circumcision
title_fullStr The association of meatal stenosis and infant circumcision
title_full_unstemmed The association of meatal stenosis and infant circumcision
title_short The association of meatal stenosis and infant circumcision
title_sort association of meatal stenosis and infant circumcision
topic circumcision
infant
meatal stenosis
meatal web
neonatal
url https://turkjpediatr.org/article/view/73
work_keys_str_mv AT sibeltiryaki theassociationofmeatalstenosisandinfantcircumcision
AT yasarissi theassociationofmeatalstenosisandinfantcircumcision
AT sibeltiryaki associationofmeatalstenosisandinfantcircumcision
AT yasarissi associationofmeatalstenosisandinfantcircumcision