Coronary heart disease clinic in patients with pacemaker, and selection of optimal electrostimulation regimen

One hundred fifty-four patients with artificial pacemaker (АРМ) and diagnosed CHD with effort angina, functional class II-IV, were included into the trial. The influence of electrocardiostimulation (ECS) on CHD clinic was surveyed. The symptoms had improved in 72 (46, 8 %) patients (Group 1), with d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. G. Iskenderov, V. A. Lusov, T. N. Vakina
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: «FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC 2004-02-01
Series:Российский кардиологический журнал
Subjects:
Online Access:https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1740
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850027087597928448
author B. G. Iskenderov
V. A. Lusov
T. N. Vakina
author_facet B. G. Iskenderov
V. A. Lusov
T. N. Vakina
author_sort B. G. Iskenderov
collection DOAJ
description One hundred fifty-four patients with artificial pacemaker (АРМ) and diagnosed CHD with effort angina, functional class II-IV, were included into the trial. The influence of electrocardiostimulation (ECS) on CHD clinic was surveyed. The symptoms had improved in 72 (46, 8 %) patients (Group 1), with decreased frequency of anginal episodes, quantity and doses of antianginal drugs taken, and increased exercise capacity. The opposite was observed in another 30 (19. 5 %) patients (Group 2), with more frequent anginal episodes, changed pain type, localisation and duration, and modified reaction to nitroglycerin. It was explained by electrostimulation associated with 1. 5-2-fold increase in heart rate, raising myocardial О2 demand, as well as by psychocardial syndrome. In remained 52 patients (33. 8 %) (Group 3), the character of anginal episodes did not react to ECS. Coronary reserve optimisation requires the flexible programming of electroimpulse frequency, according to angina and/or chronic heart failure functional class, and to ECS regimen. In particular, for patients with low coronary reserve, the frequency of 55-56 impulses per min is optimal, and individuals with congestive heart failure need 75-85 impulses per min.
format Article
id doaj-art-167df3bf08654e2c87f732e191e2ad0d
institution DOAJ
issn 1560-4071
2618-7620
language Russian
publishDate 2004-02-01
publisher «FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC
record_format Article
series Российский кардиологический журнал
spelling doaj-art-167df3bf08654e2c87f732e191e2ad0d2025-08-20T03:00:21Zrus«FIRMA «SILICEA» LLCРоссийский кардиологический журнал1560-40712618-76202004-02-01018121506Coronary heart disease clinic in patients with pacemaker, and selection of optimal electrostimulation regimenB. G. Iskenderov0V. A. Lusov1T. N. Vakina2Пензенский институт усовершенствования врачейРоссийский государственный медицинский университетПензенский институт усовершенствования врачейOne hundred fifty-four patients with artificial pacemaker (АРМ) and diagnosed CHD with effort angina, functional class II-IV, were included into the trial. The influence of electrocardiostimulation (ECS) on CHD clinic was surveyed. The symptoms had improved in 72 (46, 8 %) patients (Group 1), with decreased frequency of anginal episodes, quantity and doses of antianginal drugs taken, and increased exercise capacity. The opposite was observed in another 30 (19. 5 %) patients (Group 2), with more frequent anginal episodes, changed pain type, localisation and duration, and modified reaction to nitroglycerin. It was explained by electrostimulation associated with 1. 5-2-fold increase in heart rate, raising myocardial О2 demand, as well as by psychocardial syndrome. In remained 52 patients (33. 8 %) (Group 3), the character of anginal episodes did not react to ECS. Coronary reserve optimisation requires the flexible programming of electroimpulse frequency, according to angina and/or chronic heart failure functional class, and to ECS regimen. In particular, for patients with low coronary reserve, the frequency of 55-56 impulses per min is optimal, and individuals with congestive heart failure need 75-85 impulses per min.https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1740artificial pacemakercoronary heart diseaseelectrocardiostimulationeffort angina
spellingShingle B. G. Iskenderov
V. A. Lusov
T. N. Vakina
Coronary heart disease clinic in patients with pacemaker, and selection of optimal electrostimulation regimen
Российский кардиологический журнал
artificial pacemaker
coronary heart disease
electrocardiostimulation
effort angina
title Coronary heart disease clinic in patients with pacemaker, and selection of optimal electrostimulation regimen
title_full Coronary heart disease clinic in patients with pacemaker, and selection of optimal electrostimulation regimen
title_fullStr Coronary heart disease clinic in patients with pacemaker, and selection of optimal electrostimulation regimen
title_full_unstemmed Coronary heart disease clinic in patients with pacemaker, and selection of optimal electrostimulation regimen
title_short Coronary heart disease clinic in patients with pacemaker, and selection of optimal electrostimulation regimen
title_sort coronary heart disease clinic in patients with pacemaker and selection of optimal electrostimulation regimen
topic artificial pacemaker
coronary heart disease
electrocardiostimulation
effort angina
url https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1740
work_keys_str_mv AT bgiskenderov coronaryheartdiseaseclinicinpatientswithpacemakerandselectionofoptimalelectrostimulationregimen
AT valusov coronaryheartdiseaseclinicinpatientswithpacemakerandselectionofoptimalelectrostimulationregimen
AT tnvakina coronaryheartdiseaseclinicinpatientswithpacemakerandselectionofoptimalelectrostimulationregimen