Effects of Biochar on Soil Quality in a Maize Soybean Rotation on Mollisols

Rotation and organic material addition (e.g., biochar) are major measures to improve soil quality, but the improvement effects and mechanisms of their combination on soil quality remain unclear; the relationship between the physical, chemical, and biological parameters was has not been adequately de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Likun Hou, Yuchao Wang, Zhipeng Wang, Ruichun Gao, Xin Zhou, Siyu Yang, Xu Luo, Zhenfeng Jiang, Zhihua Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/5/1226
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850254851067346944
author Likun Hou
Yuchao Wang
Zhipeng Wang
Ruichun Gao
Xin Zhou
Siyu Yang
Xu Luo
Zhenfeng Jiang
Zhihua Liu
author_facet Likun Hou
Yuchao Wang
Zhipeng Wang
Ruichun Gao
Xin Zhou
Siyu Yang
Xu Luo
Zhenfeng Jiang
Zhihua Liu
author_sort Likun Hou
collection DOAJ
description Rotation and organic material addition (e.g., biochar) are major measures to improve soil quality, but the improvement effects and mechanisms of their combination on soil quality remain unclear; the relationship between the physical, chemical, and biological parameters was has not been adequately detected in terms of the change in quality after biochar addition. This study selected corn straw biochar as the material and established two biochar application methods: biochar mixed in 0–20 cm soil depth (B1) and biochar mixed in 0–40 cm soil depth (B2). After 3 years of maize–bean rotation, soil samples from 0–20 cm and 20–40 cm were collected to determine the soil’s physical, chemical, and biological properties, as well as crop yields. Principal component analysis was used to establish a minimum data set for the systematic analysis of soil quality and its factors. The results showed that compared with the control (CK), biochar reduced soil bulk density by 3.1% and electrical conductivity by 19.5–28.25% while increasing soil organic matter content by 7.2%, ammonium nitrogen content by 6.7–12.0%, available nitrogen content by 6.7–18.5%, available phosphorus content by 15.6–23.8%, available potassium content by 11.6–17.3%, soil urease activity by 12.25–21.6%, soil sucrase activity by 6.8–30.8%, soil neutral phosphatase activity by 5.6–9.7%, and soil catalase activity by 13.6%. Four indicators, namely bulk density, water content, pH, and nitrate nitrogen, were selected from 16 soil-quality-related indicators to form the minimum data set (MDS), and the soil quality index was calculated. Biochar application significantly increased the soil quality index (SQI) of rotation soil by 14.6–63.3% and crop yields by 5.6–7.2%. A random forest analysis of soil indicators and crop yields, combined with partial least squares structural equation modeling, revealed that biological indicators—particularly catalase activity—showed significant positive correlations with crop yields. Based on these multi-dimensional analyses, the interaction between rotation systems and biochar application improves the quality of mollisol soil plow layers by reducing bulk density and increasing catalase activity.
format Article
id doaj-art-166bfdd2c3004f1f91bf7c48484dc959
institution OA Journals
issn 2073-4395
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj-art-166bfdd2c3004f1f91bf7c48484dc9592025-08-20T01:57:01ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952025-05-01155122610.3390/agronomy15051226Effects of Biochar on Soil Quality in a Maize Soybean Rotation on MollisolsLikun Hou0Yuchao Wang1Zhipeng Wang2Ruichun Gao3Xin Zhou4Siyu Yang5Xu Luo6Zhenfeng Jiang7Zhihua Liu8College of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, ChinaKey Laboratory of Soybean Biology in Chinese Ministry of Education, College of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, ChinaRotation and organic material addition (e.g., biochar) are major measures to improve soil quality, but the improvement effects and mechanisms of their combination on soil quality remain unclear; the relationship between the physical, chemical, and biological parameters was has not been adequately detected in terms of the change in quality after biochar addition. This study selected corn straw biochar as the material and established two biochar application methods: biochar mixed in 0–20 cm soil depth (B1) and biochar mixed in 0–40 cm soil depth (B2). After 3 years of maize–bean rotation, soil samples from 0–20 cm and 20–40 cm were collected to determine the soil’s physical, chemical, and biological properties, as well as crop yields. Principal component analysis was used to establish a minimum data set for the systematic analysis of soil quality and its factors. The results showed that compared with the control (CK), biochar reduced soil bulk density by 3.1% and electrical conductivity by 19.5–28.25% while increasing soil organic matter content by 7.2%, ammonium nitrogen content by 6.7–12.0%, available nitrogen content by 6.7–18.5%, available phosphorus content by 15.6–23.8%, available potassium content by 11.6–17.3%, soil urease activity by 12.25–21.6%, soil sucrase activity by 6.8–30.8%, soil neutral phosphatase activity by 5.6–9.7%, and soil catalase activity by 13.6%. Four indicators, namely bulk density, water content, pH, and nitrate nitrogen, were selected from 16 soil-quality-related indicators to form the minimum data set (MDS), and the soil quality index was calculated. Biochar application significantly increased the soil quality index (SQI) of rotation soil by 14.6–63.3% and crop yields by 5.6–7.2%. A random forest analysis of soil indicators and crop yields, combined with partial least squares structural equation modeling, revealed that biological indicators—particularly catalase activity—showed significant positive correlations with crop yields. Based on these multi-dimensional analyses, the interaction between rotation systems and biochar application improves the quality of mollisol soil plow layers by reducing bulk density and increasing catalase activity.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/5/1226principal component analysisminimum data setcatalasesoil quality indexstructural equation modeling
spellingShingle Likun Hou
Yuchao Wang
Zhipeng Wang
Ruichun Gao
Xin Zhou
Siyu Yang
Xu Luo
Zhenfeng Jiang
Zhihua Liu
Effects of Biochar on Soil Quality in a Maize Soybean Rotation on Mollisols
Agronomy
principal component analysis
minimum data set
catalase
soil quality index
structural equation modeling
title Effects of Biochar on Soil Quality in a Maize Soybean Rotation on Mollisols
title_full Effects of Biochar on Soil Quality in a Maize Soybean Rotation on Mollisols
title_fullStr Effects of Biochar on Soil Quality in a Maize Soybean Rotation on Mollisols
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Biochar on Soil Quality in a Maize Soybean Rotation on Mollisols
title_short Effects of Biochar on Soil Quality in a Maize Soybean Rotation on Mollisols
title_sort effects of biochar on soil quality in a maize soybean rotation on mollisols
topic principal component analysis
minimum data set
catalase
soil quality index
structural equation modeling
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/5/1226
work_keys_str_mv AT likunhou effectsofbiocharonsoilqualityinamaizesoybeanrotationonmollisols
AT yuchaowang effectsofbiocharonsoilqualityinamaizesoybeanrotationonmollisols
AT zhipengwang effectsofbiocharonsoilqualityinamaizesoybeanrotationonmollisols
AT ruichungao effectsofbiocharonsoilqualityinamaizesoybeanrotationonmollisols
AT xinzhou effectsofbiocharonsoilqualityinamaizesoybeanrotationonmollisols
AT siyuyang effectsofbiocharonsoilqualityinamaizesoybeanrotationonmollisols
AT xuluo effectsofbiocharonsoilqualityinamaizesoybeanrotationonmollisols
AT zhenfengjiang effectsofbiocharonsoilqualityinamaizesoybeanrotationonmollisols
AT zhihualiu effectsofbiocharonsoilqualityinamaizesoybeanrotationonmollisols