Cost-effectiveness of adding measurement of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and serology to trachoma prevalence surveys in Tanzania and Mozambique.

<h4>Background</h4>Accurate methods to measure trachoma prevalence are critical to monitor progress and guide mass drug administration as countries near elimination. Currently, countries conduct trachoma prevalence surveys via clinical examination using the simplified trachoma grading sy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emily C Decker, Molly W Adams, William E Oswald, Rebecca M Flueckiger, Jeremiah M Ngondi, Mawo Fall, Ezgi E Yilmaz, Lisa C Brooks, George Kabona, Henis Mior Sitoe, Mabula Kasubi, Tamimo Momade, Thomas M Lietman, Thuy Doan, Rachel D Stelmach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-07-01
Series:PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013257
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849240500872151040
author Emily C Decker
Molly W Adams
William E Oswald
Rebecca M Flueckiger
Jeremiah M Ngondi
Mawo Fall
Ezgi E Yilmaz
Lisa C Brooks
George Kabona
Henis Mior Sitoe
Mabula Kasubi
Tamimo Momade
Thomas M Lietman
Thuy Doan
Rachel D Stelmach
author_facet Emily C Decker
Molly W Adams
William E Oswald
Rebecca M Flueckiger
Jeremiah M Ngondi
Mawo Fall
Ezgi E Yilmaz
Lisa C Brooks
George Kabona
Henis Mior Sitoe
Mabula Kasubi
Tamimo Momade
Thomas M Lietman
Thuy Doan
Rachel D Stelmach
author_sort Emily C Decker
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Accurate methods to measure trachoma prevalence are critical to monitor progress and guide mass drug administration as countries near elimination. Currently, countries conduct trachoma prevalence surveys via clinical examination using the simplified trachoma grading system. Grading can have reduced accuracy in low prevalence settings, potentially resulting in errors. Adding ocular swabbing and Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) infection testing and dried blood spot (DBS) collection and testing can be more sensitive and specific methods for trachoma identification, with potential cost-saving and information benefits. While previous studies have examined the costs of trachoma prevalence surveys, we present the first costing and cost-effectiveness analysis of enhanced trachoma prevalence surveys with ocular swabs and DBS in addition to grading.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>We calculated the incremental financial cost of enhanced trachoma prevalence surveys with swabs, DBS, and grading using expenditure records from four districts in Tanzania and four districts in Mozambique in 2022. In Tanzania, the cost per cluster of an enhanced survey was $2,337.39 compared to $459.75 for a standard survey. In Mozambique, the cost per cluster of an enhanced survey was $2,147.12, compared to $1,381.46 for a standard survey. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for each method, defined as the ratio of incremental cost to additional instances of trachoma indicators identified, and explored variation in cost-effectiveness via sensitivity analyses. Adding swabs, DBS, or both was cost-increasing and more effective at identification of trachoma indicators than grading alone. In Tanzania, swabs were the most cost-effective method, while DBS was more cost-effective in Mozambique. Swabs and DBS were less cost-effective when combined than individually. The main factor determining cost-effectiveness was sensitivity.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>Adding swabs or DBS to trachoma prevalence surveys can be viable, cost-effective methods for identifying trachoma indicators. The additional costs are commensurate with additional information that would support elimination efforts.
format Article
id doaj-art-1669118a11944c01a802a9b7e7c8c2db
institution Kabale University
issn 1935-2727
1935-2735
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
spelling doaj-art-1669118a11944c01a802a9b7e7c8c2db2025-08-20T04:00:34ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases1935-27271935-27352025-07-01197e001325710.1371/journal.pntd.0013257Cost-effectiveness of adding measurement of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and serology to trachoma prevalence surveys in Tanzania and Mozambique.Emily C DeckerMolly W AdamsWilliam E OswaldRebecca M FlueckigerJeremiah M NgondiMawo FallEzgi E YilmazLisa C BrooksGeorge KabonaHenis Mior SitoeMabula KasubiTamimo MomadeThomas M LietmanThuy DoanRachel D Stelmach<h4>Background</h4>Accurate methods to measure trachoma prevalence are critical to monitor progress and guide mass drug administration as countries near elimination. Currently, countries conduct trachoma prevalence surveys via clinical examination using the simplified trachoma grading system. Grading can have reduced accuracy in low prevalence settings, potentially resulting in errors. Adding ocular swabbing and Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) infection testing and dried blood spot (DBS) collection and testing can be more sensitive and specific methods for trachoma identification, with potential cost-saving and information benefits. While previous studies have examined the costs of trachoma prevalence surveys, we present the first costing and cost-effectiveness analysis of enhanced trachoma prevalence surveys with ocular swabs and DBS in addition to grading.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>We calculated the incremental financial cost of enhanced trachoma prevalence surveys with swabs, DBS, and grading using expenditure records from four districts in Tanzania and four districts in Mozambique in 2022. In Tanzania, the cost per cluster of an enhanced survey was $2,337.39 compared to $459.75 for a standard survey. In Mozambique, the cost per cluster of an enhanced survey was $2,147.12, compared to $1,381.46 for a standard survey. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for each method, defined as the ratio of incremental cost to additional instances of trachoma indicators identified, and explored variation in cost-effectiveness via sensitivity analyses. Adding swabs, DBS, or both was cost-increasing and more effective at identification of trachoma indicators than grading alone. In Tanzania, swabs were the most cost-effective method, while DBS was more cost-effective in Mozambique. Swabs and DBS were less cost-effective when combined than individually. The main factor determining cost-effectiveness was sensitivity.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>Adding swabs or DBS to trachoma prevalence surveys can be viable, cost-effective methods for identifying trachoma indicators. The additional costs are commensurate with additional information that would support elimination efforts.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013257
spellingShingle Emily C Decker
Molly W Adams
William E Oswald
Rebecca M Flueckiger
Jeremiah M Ngondi
Mawo Fall
Ezgi E Yilmaz
Lisa C Brooks
George Kabona
Henis Mior Sitoe
Mabula Kasubi
Tamimo Momade
Thomas M Lietman
Thuy Doan
Rachel D Stelmach
Cost-effectiveness of adding measurement of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and serology to trachoma prevalence surveys in Tanzania and Mozambique.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
title Cost-effectiveness of adding measurement of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and serology to trachoma prevalence surveys in Tanzania and Mozambique.
title_full Cost-effectiveness of adding measurement of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and serology to trachoma prevalence surveys in Tanzania and Mozambique.
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of adding measurement of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and serology to trachoma prevalence surveys in Tanzania and Mozambique.
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of adding measurement of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and serology to trachoma prevalence surveys in Tanzania and Mozambique.
title_short Cost-effectiveness of adding measurement of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and serology to trachoma prevalence surveys in Tanzania and Mozambique.
title_sort cost effectiveness of adding measurement of chlamydia trachomatis infection and serology to trachoma prevalence surveys in tanzania and mozambique
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013257
work_keys_str_mv AT emilycdecker costeffectivenessofaddingmeasurementofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionandserologytotrachomaprevalencesurveysintanzaniaandmozambique
AT mollywadams costeffectivenessofaddingmeasurementofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionandserologytotrachomaprevalencesurveysintanzaniaandmozambique
AT williameoswald costeffectivenessofaddingmeasurementofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionandserologytotrachomaprevalencesurveysintanzaniaandmozambique
AT rebeccamflueckiger costeffectivenessofaddingmeasurementofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionandserologytotrachomaprevalencesurveysintanzaniaandmozambique
AT jeremiahmngondi costeffectivenessofaddingmeasurementofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionandserologytotrachomaprevalencesurveysintanzaniaandmozambique
AT mawofall costeffectivenessofaddingmeasurementofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionandserologytotrachomaprevalencesurveysintanzaniaandmozambique
AT ezgieyilmaz costeffectivenessofaddingmeasurementofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionandserologytotrachomaprevalencesurveysintanzaniaandmozambique
AT lisacbrooks costeffectivenessofaddingmeasurementofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionandserologytotrachomaprevalencesurveysintanzaniaandmozambique
AT georgekabona costeffectivenessofaddingmeasurementofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionandserologytotrachomaprevalencesurveysintanzaniaandmozambique
AT henismiorsitoe costeffectivenessofaddingmeasurementofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionandserologytotrachomaprevalencesurveysintanzaniaandmozambique
AT mabulakasubi costeffectivenessofaddingmeasurementofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionandserologytotrachomaprevalencesurveysintanzaniaandmozambique
AT tamimomomade costeffectivenessofaddingmeasurementofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionandserologytotrachomaprevalencesurveysintanzaniaandmozambique
AT thomasmlietman costeffectivenessofaddingmeasurementofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionandserologytotrachomaprevalencesurveysintanzaniaandmozambique
AT thuydoan costeffectivenessofaddingmeasurementofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionandserologytotrachomaprevalencesurveysintanzaniaandmozambique
AT racheldstelmach costeffectivenessofaddingmeasurementofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionandserologytotrachomaprevalencesurveysintanzaniaandmozambique