حدِّ حرابہ اور اس کے نفاذ سے متعلق فقہی اختلافات کا تقابلی جائزہ
The term Hirāba which was later on placed in the category Ḥudūd (Specified Punishment for certain crimes discussed in Qurʼān or Sunnah) preceded by 33rd verse of Surah al-Maida where death or crucifixion or cutting of a hand and a foot from alternate sides or banishment has been laid as punishment f...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Arabic |
| Published: |
Bahauddin Zakariya University
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | Pakistan Journal of Islamic Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://pjir.bzu.edu.pk/website/journal/article/60190781b2ef7/page |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850154903765254144 |
|---|---|
| author | Mushtaq Ahmad Muhammad Zakariya Atta ur Rehman |
| author_facet | Mushtaq Ahmad Muhammad Zakariya Atta ur Rehman |
| author_sort | Mushtaq Ahmad |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The term Hirāba which was later on placed in the category Ḥudūd (Specified Punishment for certain crimes discussed in Qurʼān or Sunnah) preceded by 33rd verse of Surah al-Maida where death or crucifixion or cutting of a hand and a foot from alternate sides or banishment has been laid as punishment for those who are found waging war against Allah and his Messenger and causing disruption on the earth. Here controversies among the jurists have been penetrated about the site of commission, modus operindi and the question of the power and jurisdiction of the court with reference to the enforcement of the mentioned punishments raised after the separate interpretations made by jurists. Crucifixion in the form of open-hanging was termed as fanatic and barbaric sort of execution and hence was not accommodated in Ḥudūd Ordinance 1979, but current circumstances and severe forms of anti-state raids, kidnaping teenagers, their assassination after committing rape and alike has led the contemporary thought to the Parliament for the revival of crucifixion in the form of open hanging. The enforcement of the latest punishment of Nafi (banishment) is also a controversial juristic matter whether to replace it by due imprisonment or it should be enforced as per Qurʼānic injunctions. All such controversies and differences of the juristic opinion and interpretation have been tried to be explored and analyzed in this short article with a conclusion that Ḥudūd-e-Sharīáh are still mod and can ensure a stable state and a peaceful society. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-165fbedfc9dd420e97c93c3d27bf9afc |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2070-0326 2618-0820 |
| language | Arabic |
| publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
| publisher | Bahauddin Zakariya University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Pakistan Journal of Islamic Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-165fbedfc9dd420e97c93c3d27bf9afc2025-08-20T02:25:08ZaraBahauddin Zakariya UniversityPakistan Journal of Islamic Research2070-03262618-08202020-06-0121160190781b2ef7حدِّ حرابہ اور اس کے نفاذ سے متعلق فقہی اختلافات کا تقابلی جائزہMushtaq Ahmad0Muhammad Zakariya1Atta ur Rehman2Dean Faculty of Social Sciences, Qurtaba University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar.Lecturer, Department of Islamic Studies, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan.Ph.D Scholar, Qurtaba University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar.The term Hirāba which was later on placed in the category Ḥudūd (Specified Punishment for certain crimes discussed in Qurʼān or Sunnah) preceded by 33rd verse of Surah al-Maida where death or crucifixion or cutting of a hand and a foot from alternate sides or banishment has been laid as punishment for those who are found waging war against Allah and his Messenger and causing disruption on the earth. Here controversies among the jurists have been penetrated about the site of commission, modus operindi and the question of the power and jurisdiction of the court with reference to the enforcement of the mentioned punishments raised after the separate interpretations made by jurists. Crucifixion in the form of open-hanging was termed as fanatic and barbaric sort of execution and hence was not accommodated in Ḥudūd Ordinance 1979, but current circumstances and severe forms of anti-state raids, kidnaping teenagers, their assassination after committing rape and alike has led the contemporary thought to the Parliament for the revival of crucifixion in the form of open hanging. The enforcement of the latest punishment of Nafi (banishment) is also a controversial juristic matter whether to replace it by due imprisonment or it should be enforced as per Qurʼānic injunctions. All such controversies and differences of the juristic opinion and interpretation have been tried to be explored and analyzed in this short article with a conclusion that Ḥudūd-e-Sharīáh are still mod and can ensure a stable state and a peaceful society.http://pjir.bzu.edu.pk/website/journal/article/60190781b2ef7/pageNafiCrucifixionDacoityQisasTakhweef |
| spellingShingle | Mushtaq Ahmad Muhammad Zakariya Atta ur Rehman حدِّ حرابہ اور اس کے نفاذ سے متعلق فقہی اختلافات کا تقابلی جائزہ Pakistan Journal of Islamic Research Nafi Crucifixion Dacoity Qisas Takhweef |
| title | حدِّ حرابہ اور اس کے نفاذ سے متعلق فقہی اختلافات کا تقابلی جائزہ |
| title_full | حدِّ حرابہ اور اس کے نفاذ سے متعلق فقہی اختلافات کا تقابلی جائزہ |
| title_fullStr | حدِّ حرابہ اور اس کے نفاذ سے متعلق فقہی اختلافات کا تقابلی جائزہ |
| title_full_unstemmed | حدِّ حرابہ اور اس کے نفاذ سے متعلق فقہی اختلافات کا تقابلی جائزہ |
| title_short | حدِّ حرابہ اور اس کے نفاذ سے متعلق فقہی اختلافات کا تقابلی جائزہ |
| title_sort | حدِّ حرابہ اور اس کے نفاذ سے متعلق فقہی اختلافات کا تقابلی جائزہ |
| topic | Nafi Crucifixion Dacoity Qisas Takhweef |
| url | http://pjir.bzu.edu.pk/website/journal/article/60190781b2ef7/page |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mushtaqahmad ḥdĩḥrạbہạwrạsḵےnfạdẖsےmtʿlqfqہyạkẖtlạfạtḵạtqạblyjạỷzہ AT muhammadzakariya ḥdĩḥrạbہạwrạsḵےnfạdẖsےmtʿlqfqہyạkẖtlạfạtḵạtqạblyjạỷzہ AT attaurrehman ḥdĩḥrạbہạwrạsḵےnfạdẖsےmtʿlqfqہyạkẖtlạfạtḵạtqạblyjạỷzہ |