Social cognition in bipolar I and II disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Objective In recent years, there has been a rapid increase in reports upon social-cognition impairments in bipolar disorder. This study aimed to compare the characteristics of social cognition domains in bipolar I (BD I) and II (BD II) based on the findings to date. Methods A systematic lit...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2025-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Psychiatry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06462-z |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832594459772059648 |
---|---|
author | Bingren Zhang Xuyu Chen Nianhua Qiu |
author_facet | Bingren Zhang Xuyu Chen Nianhua Qiu |
author_sort | Bingren Zhang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Objective In recent years, there has been a rapid increase in reports upon social-cognition impairments in bipolar disorder. This study aimed to compare the characteristics of social cognition domains in bipolar I (BD I) and II (BD II) based on the findings to date. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted on Web of Science and PubMed from inception to 28 August 2024. Studies with all-age-group of ICD-10, DSM-IV, DSM-IV-TR, or DSM-5 defined BD (I or II) either in a remitted or symptomatic state were included. The risk of bias was measured using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and the quality of the sources was evaluated using GRADE criteria. Results of the studies were measured by synthesizing Hedge’s g effect sizes through a random effects meta-analytic approach. Results A total of 20 studies were included, covering three core domains of social cognition (theory of mind (ToM), emotion processing and attributions). There was no significant difference in ToM between BD I and BD II and in emotion processing between non-psychotic patients with BD I and BD II, and history of psychosis negatively predicted performance on emotion processing. Furthermore, BD II performed worse than BD I in attributions, with a low to moderate summary effect size. Conclusions BD I and BD II performed similarly on ToM and emotional processing, but BD II had more impaired attributions. Future studies are encouraged to control for the influence of clinical features, to use more neuroscientific techniques, and to explore on other domains of social cognition in bipolar subtypes. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-15f6f954e8af47a49988b6b71d27fdcc |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1471-244X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Psychiatry |
spelling | doaj-art-15f6f954e8af47a49988b6b71d27fdcc2025-01-19T12:34:26ZengBMCBMC Psychiatry1471-244X2025-01-0125111210.1186/s12888-024-06462-zSocial cognition in bipolar I and II disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysisBingren Zhang0Xuyu Chen1Nianhua Qiu2Affiliated Hospital (School of Clinical Medicine), Hangzhou Normal UniversityAffiliated Hospital (School of Clinical Medicine), Hangzhou Normal UniversitySchool of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal UniversityAbstract Objective In recent years, there has been a rapid increase in reports upon social-cognition impairments in bipolar disorder. This study aimed to compare the characteristics of social cognition domains in bipolar I (BD I) and II (BD II) based on the findings to date. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted on Web of Science and PubMed from inception to 28 August 2024. Studies with all-age-group of ICD-10, DSM-IV, DSM-IV-TR, or DSM-5 defined BD (I or II) either in a remitted or symptomatic state were included. The risk of bias was measured using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and the quality of the sources was evaluated using GRADE criteria. Results of the studies were measured by synthesizing Hedge’s g effect sizes through a random effects meta-analytic approach. Results A total of 20 studies were included, covering three core domains of social cognition (theory of mind (ToM), emotion processing and attributions). There was no significant difference in ToM between BD I and BD II and in emotion processing between non-psychotic patients with BD I and BD II, and history of psychosis negatively predicted performance on emotion processing. Furthermore, BD II performed worse than BD I in attributions, with a low to moderate summary effect size. Conclusions BD I and BD II performed similarly on ToM and emotional processing, but BD II had more impaired attributions. Future studies are encouraged to control for the influence of clinical features, to use more neuroscientific techniques, and to explore on other domains of social cognition in bipolar subtypes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06462-zBipolar I disorder (BD I)Bipolar II disorder (BD II)Social cognition |
spellingShingle | Bingren Zhang Xuyu Chen Nianhua Qiu Social cognition in bipolar I and II disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Psychiatry Bipolar I disorder (BD I) Bipolar II disorder (BD II) Social cognition |
title | Social cognition in bipolar I and II disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Social cognition in bipolar I and II disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Social cognition in bipolar I and II disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Social cognition in bipolar I and II disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Social cognition in bipolar I and II disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | social cognition in bipolar i and ii disorders an updated systematic review and meta analysis |
topic | Bipolar I disorder (BD I) Bipolar II disorder (BD II) Social cognition |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06462-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bingrenzhang socialcognitioninbipolariandiidisordersanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuyuchen socialcognitioninbipolariandiidisordersanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nianhuaqiu socialcognitioninbipolariandiidisordersanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |