No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test Batteries

# Background Patients report psychological barriers as important when returning to sport, however, psychological outcome measures are seldom included in return to sport (RTS) assessment. There is a need for clinical trials to integrate psychological patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in return to spo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ramana Piussi, Rebecca Simonson, Johan Högberg, Roland Thomeé, Kristian Samuelsson, Eric Hamrin Senorski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North American Sports Medicine Institute 2023-08-01
Series:International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.81064
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825139373189890048
author Ramana Piussi
Rebecca Simonson
Johan Högberg
Roland Thomeé
Kristian Samuelsson
Eric Hamrin Senorski
author_facet Ramana Piussi
Rebecca Simonson
Johan Högberg
Roland Thomeé
Kristian Samuelsson
Eric Hamrin Senorski
author_sort Ramana Piussi
collection DOAJ
description # Background Patients report psychological barriers as important when returning to sport, however, psychological outcome measures are seldom included in return to sport (RTS) assessment. There is a need for clinical trials to integrate psychological patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in return to sport batteries assessing patients treated with ACL reconstruction. # Objective The aim of this study was to determine the association between passing clinical tests of muscle function and psychological PROs and sustaining a second ACL injury in patients who RTS after primary ACL reconstruction. # Design Retrospective Cohort study # Methods Patients' sex, age, height and weight, and the results of strength and hop tests, as well as answers to PRO's (including Tegner activity scale, the ACL Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI) as well as the Quality of Life (QoL) subscale of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score \[KOOS\]), were extracted from a rehabilitation-specific registry. Four different test batteries comprising muscle function tests and PROs were created to assess whether patients were ready to RTS. Passing each of the test batteries (yes/no) was used as an independent variable. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model analysis was performed, with sustaining a second ACL injury (either ipsi- or contralateral; yes/no) within two years of RTS as the dependent variable. # Results A total of 419 patients (male, n=214; 51%) were included, of which 51 (12.2%) suffered a second ACL injury within the first two years after RTS. There were no differences in passing rates in the different RTS test batteries comprising muscle function tests and PROs for patients who suffered a second ACL injury compared to patients who did not. # Conclusion No association between passing the RTS clinical tests batteries comprising muscle function and psychological PROs used, and the risk of a second ACL injury could be found. # Level of Evidence 3
format Article
id doaj-art-15d226530e91443b8a85f48e3d73a55f
institution Kabale University
issn 2159-2896
language English
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher North American Sports Medicine Institute
record_format Article
series International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
spelling doaj-art-15d226530e91443b8a85f48e3d73a55f2025-02-11T20:29:58ZengNorth American Sports Medicine InstituteInternational Journal of Sports Physical Therapy2159-28962023-08-01184No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test BatteriesRamana PiussiRebecca SimonsonJohan HögbergRoland ThomeéKristian SamuelssonEric Hamrin Senorski# Background Patients report psychological barriers as important when returning to sport, however, psychological outcome measures are seldom included in return to sport (RTS) assessment. There is a need for clinical trials to integrate psychological patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in return to sport batteries assessing patients treated with ACL reconstruction. # Objective The aim of this study was to determine the association between passing clinical tests of muscle function and psychological PROs and sustaining a second ACL injury in patients who RTS after primary ACL reconstruction. # Design Retrospective Cohort study # Methods Patients' sex, age, height and weight, and the results of strength and hop tests, as well as answers to PRO's (including Tegner activity scale, the ACL Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI) as well as the Quality of Life (QoL) subscale of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score \[KOOS\]), were extracted from a rehabilitation-specific registry. Four different test batteries comprising muscle function tests and PROs were created to assess whether patients were ready to RTS. Passing each of the test batteries (yes/no) was used as an independent variable. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model analysis was performed, with sustaining a second ACL injury (either ipsi- or contralateral; yes/no) within two years of RTS as the dependent variable. # Results A total of 419 patients (male, n=214; 51%) were included, of which 51 (12.2%) suffered a second ACL injury within the first two years after RTS. There were no differences in passing rates in the different RTS test batteries comprising muscle function tests and PROs for patients who suffered a second ACL injury compared to patients who did not. # Conclusion No association between passing the RTS clinical tests batteries comprising muscle function and psychological PROs used, and the risk of a second ACL injury could be found. # Level of Evidence 3https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.81064
spellingShingle Ramana Piussi
Rebecca Simonson
Johan Högberg
Roland Thomeé
Kristian Samuelsson
Eric Hamrin Senorski
No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test Batteries
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
title No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test Batteries
title_full No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test Batteries
title_fullStr No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test Batteries
title_full_unstemmed No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test Batteries
title_short No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test Batteries
title_sort no effect of return to sport test batteries with and without psychological pros on the risk of a second acl injury a critical assessment of four different test batteries
url https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.81064
work_keys_str_mv AT ramanapiussi noeffectofreturntosporttestbatterieswithandwithoutpsychologicalprosontheriskofasecondaclinjuryacriticalassessmentoffourdifferenttestbatteries
AT rebeccasimonson noeffectofreturntosporttestbatterieswithandwithoutpsychologicalprosontheriskofasecondaclinjuryacriticalassessmentoffourdifferenttestbatteries
AT johanhogberg noeffectofreturntosporttestbatterieswithandwithoutpsychologicalprosontheriskofasecondaclinjuryacriticalassessmentoffourdifferenttestbatteries
AT rolandthomee noeffectofreturntosporttestbatterieswithandwithoutpsychologicalprosontheriskofasecondaclinjuryacriticalassessmentoffourdifferenttestbatteries
AT kristiansamuelsson noeffectofreturntosporttestbatterieswithandwithoutpsychologicalprosontheriskofasecondaclinjuryacriticalassessmentoffourdifferenttestbatteries
AT erichamrinsenorski noeffectofreturntosporttestbatterieswithandwithoutpsychologicalprosontheriskofasecondaclinjuryacriticalassessmentoffourdifferenttestbatteries