Affect et comparaison dans le dialogue en autoconfrontation
The purpose of this article is to analyze the process of appropriating dialogue in a clinic activity perspective. This process relates to how professionals can make a comparison between their activities a means of dialogue, which is not a spontaneous process, but a result of dialogical development i...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Association Recherche et Pratique sur les Activités
2019-04-01
|
| Series: | Activités |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/activites/4007 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The purpose of this article is to analyze the process of appropriating dialogue in a clinic activity perspective. This process relates to how professionals can make a comparison between their activities a means of dialogue, which is not a spontaneous process, but a result of dialogical development in the different contexts that we will describe. Affectivity plays a central role in this process. In the constrained framework of crossed self-confrontation, there may be some forms of instrumental genesis of comparison which become organizers of dialogic activity. Appropriation of this dialogical means by professionnals equips dialogues and makes it possible to go beyond the standard socially shared discourses on work and its associated problems. Comparison then becomes a way to affect one’s own activity or that of others in dialogue. This supposes an intervention activity that takes these affective movements into account. We will use a clinical example to show that when this kind of comparison takes place within crossed self-confrontation, it can engage developments of professional activity, which thus make itpossible to view the self-confrontation method as a “social situation of development” (Vygotsky, 1998). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1765-2723 |