Selective Capsulotomies and Partial Capsulectomy in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Revision Surgery

Background. Breast cancer with about 2.3 million diagnoses and 685,000 deaths globally is the most frequent malignancy in the female population. Continuous research has led to oncological and reconstructive advances in the management of breast cancer, thus improving outcomes and decreasing patient m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pietro Susini, Gianluca Marcaccini, Francesco Ruben Giardino, Mirco Pozzi, Francesco Volanti, Giuseppe Nisi, Roberto Cuomo, Luca Grimaldi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:The Breast Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/9097040
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832558637280657408
author Pietro Susini
Gianluca Marcaccini
Francesco Ruben Giardino
Mirco Pozzi
Francesco Volanti
Giuseppe Nisi
Roberto Cuomo
Luca Grimaldi
author_facet Pietro Susini
Gianluca Marcaccini
Francesco Ruben Giardino
Mirco Pozzi
Francesco Volanti
Giuseppe Nisi
Roberto Cuomo
Luca Grimaldi
author_sort Pietro Susini
collection DOAJ
description Background. Breast cancer with about 2.3 million diagnoses and 685,000 deaths globally is the most frequent malignancy in the female population. Continuous research has led to oncological and reconstructive advances in the management of breast cancer, thus improving outcomes and decreasing patient morbidity. Nowadays, the submuscular expander and prosthesis (E/P) implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) accounts for 73% of all reconstructions. Despite its widely accepted efficacy, the technique is not free from complications and up to 28% of cases require revision surgery for mechanical complications such as capsular contracture, implant displacement/rotation, and implant rupture. With this study, the authors report their experience in the management of E/P IBR revision surgery through the technique of Selective Capsulotomies (SCs) and Partial Capsulectomy (PC). Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on patients who had previously undergone E/P IBR and presented for revision reconstruction between January 2013 and May 2023 at the Department of Plastic Surgery of the University of Siena, Italy. Reasons for revision included capsular contracture, implant displacement/rotation, and implant rupture. Revision reconstructions involved SC and PC with implant replacement. Fat grafting was also considered. The complication rate was evaluated by analysis of patients’ medical records. Patients’ satisfaction with the treatment was assessed through a specific questionnaire. Results. 32 patients underwent revision surgeries. No early complication occurred. Recurrence rate was assessed at 19% with average follow-up of 59 months (range: 13–114 months). The average time between revision surgery and recurrence was 3 years (range: 1–6 years). 23 patients answered the questionnaire and were overall satisfied with the treatments (8.29/10). Conclusions. SC possibly associated to PC is a valuable option for E/P IBR revision surgery with minimal complications, reduced surgical trauma, short operating time, and relatively low recurrence risk. In addition, treated patients are overall satisfied with the results over time.
format Article
id doaj-art-153e67294d284eaeb54d25493abd8135
institution Kabale University
issn 1524-4741
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Breast Journal
spelling doaj-art-153e67294d284eaeb54d25493abd81352025-02-03T01:31:53ZengWileyThe Breast Journal1524-47412024-01-01202410.1155/2024/9097040Selective Capsulotomies and Partial Capsulectomy in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Revision SurgeryPietro Susini0Gianluca Marcaccini1Francesco Ruben Giardino2Mirco Pozzi3Francesco Volanti4Giuseppe Nisi5Roberto Cuomo6Luca Grimaldi7Plastic Surgery UnitPlastic Surgery UnitPlastic Surgery UnitPlastic Surgery UnitPlastic Surgery UnitPlastic Surgery UnitPlastic Surgery UnitPlastic Surgery UnitBackground. Breast cancer with about 2.3 million diagnoses and 685,000 deaths globally is the most frequent malignancy in the female population. Continuous research has led to oncological and reconstructive advances in the management of breast cancer, thus improving outcomes and decreasing patient morbidity. Nowadays, the submuscular expander and prosthesis (E/P) implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) accounts for 73% of all reconstructions. Despite its widely accepted efficacy, the technique is not free from complications and up to 28% of cases require revision surgery for mechanical complications such as capsular contracture, implant displacement/rotation, and implant rupture. With this study, the authors report their experience in the management of E/P IBR revision surgery through the technique of Selective Capsulotomies (SCs) and Partial Capsulectomy (PC). Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on patients who had previously undergone E/P IBR and presented for revision reconstruction between January 2013 and May 2023 at the Department of Plastic Surgery of the University of Siena, Italy. Reasons for revision included capsular contracture, implant displacement/rotation, and implant rupture. Revision reconstructions involved SC and PC with implant replacement. Fat grafting was also considered. The complication rate was evaluated by analysis of patients’ medical records. Patients’ satisfaction with the treatment was assessed through a specific questionnaire. Results. 32 patients underwent revision surgeries. No early complication occurred. Recurrence rate was assessed at 19% with average follow-up of 59 months (range: 13–114 months). The average time between revision surgery and recurrence was 3 years (range: 1–6 years). 23 patients answered the questionnaire and were overall satisfied with the treatments (8.29/10). Conclusions. SC possibly associated to PC is a valuable option for E/P IBR revision surgery with minimal complications, reduced surgical trauma, short operating time, and relatively low recurrence risk. In addition, treated patients are overall satisfied with the results over time.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/9097040
spellingShingle Pietro Susini
Gianluca Marcaccini
Francesco Ruben Giardino
Mirco Pozzi
Francesco Volanti
Giuseppe Nisi
Roberto Cuomo
Luca Grimaldi
Selective Capsulotomies and Partial Capsulectomy in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Revision Surgery
The Breast Journal
title Selective Capsulotomies and Partial Capsulectomy in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Revision Surgery
title_full Selective Capsulotomies and Partial Capsulectomy in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Revision Surgery
title_fullStr Selective Capsulotomies and Partial Capsulectomy in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Revision Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Selective Capsulotomies and Partial Capsulectomy in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Revision Surgery
title_short Selective Capsulotomies and Partial Capsulectomy in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Revision Surgery
title_sort selective capsulotomies and partial capsulectomy in implant based breast reconstruction revision surgery
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/9097040
work_keys_str_mv AT pietrosusini selectivecapsulotomiesandpartialcapsulectomyinimplantbasedbreastreconstructionrevisionsurgery
AT gianlucamarcaccini selectivecapsulotomiesandpartialcapsulectomyinimplantbasedbreastreconstructionrevisionsurgery
AT francescorubengiardino selectivecapsulotomiesandpartialcapsulectomyinimplantbasedbreastreconstructionrevisionsurgery
AT mircopozzi selectivecapsulotomiesandpartialcapsulectomyinimplantbasedbreastreconstructionrevisionsurgery
AT francescovolanti selectivecapsulotomiesandpartialcapsulectomyinimplantbasedbreastreconstructionrevisionsurgery
AT giuseppenisi selectivecapsulotomiesandpartialcapsulectomyinimplantbasedbreastreconstructionrevisionsurgery
AT robertocuomo selectivecapsulotomiesandpartialcapsulectomyinimplantbasedbreastreconstructionrevisionsurgery
AT lucagrimaldi selectivecapsulotomiesandpartialcapsulectomyinimplantbasedbreastreconstructionrevisionsurgery